Back Issues

If you would like a printed copy of any of our back issues, then they can be purchased on Farm Marketplace. You can also download the PDFs or read online from links below.

  • How To Start Drilling For £8K

    Clive Bailye’s seed drill of choice is his 6m John Deere 750A , which has been used exclusively for 3-4 seasons. Last year, with an increased acreage, the founder and publisher of this Direct Driller magazine thought a second seed drill was necessary. Having just the one machine was a risk and in a difficult season would mean drilling was delayed. He looked around and found a good condition Horsch CO6 tine drill advertised in Germany.

    Words and pictures by Mike Donovan

    upload_2018-4-7_16-39-39.png

    After delivery he rebuilt the coulters to a narrow profile so as to reduce soil disturbance. He says the tine drill is very useful driling after straw crops such as osr and also through the straw on second crop cereals.

    Buying the drill from a German farmer was not particularly complicated, and provided him with a higher spec machine than Horsh sell in the UK. The seed dart tyres are much wider, and the machine is fitted with blockage monitors as well as full width front packers and also a liquid fert application system.

    A sheaf of photos were taken, and Clive then asked for some of specific parts to show wear. The deal was done at under £5,000 which Clive says is the market value of these machines which are too large for small farmers to buy. Original owners like to buy new and sell when the machine is still in good condition.

    Narrow tines with wear tiles

    @Clive knew he wanted to make changes, substituting the Horsch tines and coulters for something far narrower, and has ended up getting his own design of tine made, which has a wear tile made from Ferobide, far harder than tungsten. The drill is on the farm primarily for osr and 2nd crop cereals drilled into chopped straw and the 25cm spacing is okay for these crops.

    Comments on Clive’s on-line forum, TFF, said the drill many not be so good with beans, as the slot is a mere 12mm wide. And in barley the spacing may well be too wide as it needs to be thick. Clive points out that the seed pipe can actually be a bit wider than 12mm as it is in the shadow of the point. It would be good to have the option of using it for beans.

    upload_2018-4-7_16-42-6.png

    Above left: The cheap CO6 is being calibrated ready for its first outing

    upload_2018-4-7_16-42-44.png

    Above right: The adapted Horsch is being filled by the home built drill logistics trailer with seed and liquid starter fert.

    Getting around the German instructions

    The Horsch came, of course, with a control box and instructions in German. More on-line discussion revealed that English instructions were available on the Horsch website, and another explained that Horsch was sourcing some of these parts from Agton in Canada anyway. Zealman from New Zealand explained that the button marked with callipers should be held down for around 5 seconds. The menu is where you adjust the tramline sequence, valve layout and row numbers.

    upload_2018-4-7_16-44-45.png

    Ball hitch is a continental standard and provides a positive connection between tractor and drill

    upload_2018-4-7_16-45-16.png

    The Stocks Wizard has a rotor modified for Avadex which otherwise leaks everywhere

    A Stocks Wizard is on the back of the drill and used for Avadex. Here again the knowledge of actual farmers is helpful. Alistair Nelson warned that the rotor and the surrounding shroud need to be changed, and he got good advice “from Rick at Stocks”. Clive has the same setup on the 750A and says that the Avadex leaks everywhere unless the modification is made. The drill was acquired and modified in 2016 and the results have been excellent.

    The machine went through the residue without many problems and having the second drill has meant more timely planting. Clive has shown that moving into No-Till is not the expensive exercise so many farmers think it might be. The total cost, after modifications which included replacing all tines and coulters, was under £8,000.

    Author Mike Donovan writes: we have featured a number of home made direct drills in @Practical Farm Ideas, and are always interested in seeing more. Please contact mike editor@farmideas.co.uk or 07778877514.

  • Issue 22: What do you read?

    If you are like us, then you don’t know where to start when it comes to other reading apart from farming magazines.  However, there is so much information out there that can help us understand our businesses, farm better and understand the position of non-farmers.

    We have listed a few more books you might find interesting, challenge the way you currently think and help you farm better.

    Entangled Life: How Fungi Make Our Worlds, Change Our Minds and Shape Our Futures

    The more we learn about fungi, the less makes sense without them.

    Neither plant nor animal, they are found throughout the earth, the air and our bodies. They can be microscopic, yet also account for the largest organisms ever recorded. They enabled the first life on land, can survive unprotected in space and thrive amidst nuclear radiation. In fact, nearly all life relies in some way on fungi.

    These endlessly surprising organisms have no brain but can solve problems and manipulate animal behaviour with devastating precision. In giving us bread, alcohol and life-saving medicines, fungi have shaped human history, and their psychedelic properties have recently been shown to alleviate a number of mental illnesses. Their ability to digest plastic, explosives, pesticides and crude oil is being harnessed in break-through technologies, and the discovery that they connect plants in underground networks, the ‘Wood Wide Web’, is transforming the way we understand ecosystems. Yet over ninety percent of their species remain undocumented.

    Entangled Life is a mind-altering journey into a spectacular and neglected world, and shows that fungi provide a key to understanding both the planet on which we live, and life itself.

    The Secret Network of Nature: The Delicate Balance of All Living Things

    The natural world is a web of intricate connections, many of which go unnoticed by humans. But it is these connections that maintain nature’s finely balanced equilibrium.

    Drawing on the latest scientific discoveries and decades of experience as a forester, Peter Wohlleben shows us how different animals, plants, rivers, rocks and weather systems cooperate, and what’s at stake when these delicate systems are unbalanced.

    The Hidden Life of Trees: What They Feel, How They Communicate

    Are trees social beings? How do trees live? Do they feel pain or have awareness of their surroundings?

    In The Hidden Life of Trees Peter Wohlleben makes the case that the forest is a social network. He draws on groundbreaking scientific discoveries to describe how trees are like human families: tree parents live together with their children, communicate with them, support them as they grow, share nutrients with those who are sick or struggling, and even warn each other of impending dangers. Wohlleben also shares his deep love of woods and forests, explaining the amazing processes of life, death and regeneration he has observed in his woodland.

    A walk in the woods will never be the same again.

    A Soil Owner’s Manual: How to Restore and Maintain Soil Health

    A Soil Owner’s Manual: Restoring and Maintaining Soil Health, is about restoring the capacity of your soil to perform all the functions it was intended to perform. This book is not another fanciful guide on how to continuously manipulate and amend your soil to try and keep it productive. This book will change the way you think about and manage your soil. It may even change your life. If you are interested in solving the problem of dysfunctional soil and successfully addressing the symptoms of soil erosion, water runoff, nutrient deficiencies, compaction, soil crusting, weeds, insect pests, plant diseases, and water pollution, or simply wish to grow healthy vegetables in your family garden, then this book is for you. Soil health pioneer Jon Stika, describes in simple terms how you can bring your soil back to its full productive potential by understanding and applying the principles that built your soil in the first place. Understanding how the soil functions is critical to reducing the reliance on expensive inputs to maintain yields. Working with, instead of against, the processes that naturally govern the soil can increase profitability and restore the soil to health. Restoring soil health can proactively solve natural resource issues before regulations are imposed that will merely address the symptoms. This book will lead you through the basic biology and guiding principles that will allow you to assess and restore your soil. It is part of a movement currently underway in agriculture that is working to restore what has been lost. A Soil Owner’s Manual: Restoring and Maintaining Soil Health will give you the opportunity to be part of this movement. Restoring soil health is restoring hope in the future of agriculture, from large farm fields and pastures, down to your own vegetable or flower garden.

  • Issue 22: Direct Driller Patrons

    Thank you to those who has signed up to be a Direct Driller Patron after the last issue. Our farmer writers are now rewarded for sharing their hard-earned knowledge and our readers have the facility to place a value upon that. The Direct Driller Patron programme gives readers the opportunity to “pay it forward” and place a value on what they get from the magazine. But only once they feel they have learned something valuable.

    We urge everyone reading to consider how much value you have gained from the information in the magazine. Has it saved you money? Inspired you to try something different? Entertained you? Helped you understand or solve a problem? If the answer is “Yes”, please become a patron so that we can attract more new readers to the magazine and they can in turn learn without any barriers to knowledge.

    Simply click here to become a patron and support the continued growth and success of the magazine. Pay it forward and pass on the ability to read the magazine to another farmer.

    Many Thanks, Clive and the rest of the Direct Driller team

    Patrons

    Clive Bailye
    Justas Vasiliauskas
    Trevor Bennett
    Tracy Gleeson
    Richard Reams
    Nigel Joice
    Hugh Marcus
    Richard Rawlings
    David Grainge
    Michael Fray
    Duncan Wilson
    Mark Middleton
    Ben Taylor-Davies
    Richard Thomas
    David White
    Robert Beaumont
    Andy Meecham
    Colin McGregor
    Simon Cowell
    Louis Stephenson
    Stephen Tate
    John Pawsey
    Charles Whitbread
    Nick Herring
    James Chamings
    Richard Bruce-White
    James Bretherton
    Tim Ashley
    Douglas Christie
    Gavin Lane
    Andrew Bott
    Gary Yeomans
    James Dorse
    Mike Porter
    Harry James
    David Fuller-Shapcott
    John Cantrill
    Blazej Delnicki
    Ed Spencer
    Julian Gold
    Adam Driver
    Russell Calder
    Glyn Rogers
    Becky Willson
    Kevin Roberts
    David Aglen
    Sam Middleton
    David Lord
    Stephen Edwards
    Emma Dennis
    Robert Johnston
    Tim Palmer
    Tim Parton
    Ian Knight
    Dan Finch
    Chris Behagg
    Andrew Jackson
    Dougal Hosford
    Philip Rowbottom
    Sam Ayre
    Tim Ellis
    Gavin Fauvel
    Neil Douglas Fuller
    bill Dilks
    James Biggar
    James Halford
    William Hellsten
    Joe Fisher
    Jeremy Iles
    Jock McFarlane
    David Sanders
    Charles Paynter
    Robert Barclay
    Stuart Rogers
    Edward Bullock
    Nerijus Uldukis
    Stephen Temple
    Nigel Greenwood
    Will Evans

  • Farmer Focus – Steve May

    July 2023

    With my year as 2022 FSOOTY winner coming to an end here are a few thoughts on the spring workload and how the new sprayer has performed. First off, I’m Steve May and I work for Fromant and Sanders at Kislingbury near Northampton, a family arable farm with extra contracting work in the form of whole farm contracts and one off jobs covering the local area. My focus is on spraying, drilling and primary cultivation both in planning and execution working closely with our agronomist and management team. Cropping consists of winter wheat, winter barley, oilseed rape, winter beans, winter oats and spring barley. Wheat is mainly milling Zyatt and Skyfall (hard group one’s) and Astronomer and Firefly (soft group threes). 

    With Septoria and yellow rust pressures very high this season I’m pleased we’ve managed to keep them all relatively clean so far with a robust fungicide program based around Folpet and Tebuconozole at T0, Prothioconazole and Folpet at T1 and Pyaclostrobin and Folpet at T2 with a few other actives thrown into the mix as well so far. Hybrid winter barley is grown here. We like the vigorous nature of the plant, its ability to tiller in early spring gives it the power to push on and deliver us some good yields. We have four varieties this year Bazooka, Belfry, Kingsbarn and Armadillo. 

    They do need a strong PGR as they can get very big and we want everything standing at harvest. Our main break crop is still oilseed rape and I have to say we have been very lucky with it this year; it was drilled with our 6 metre Horsch Avatar after a light cultivation to work in a dressing of sludge in late August following 40mm of rain. CSFB pressure wasn’t too high and it got away well, knee high by the end of October! However, the hard frost in December and some patches of winter stem weevil, a pest we’ve never really seen before, hammered it back hard. 

    With the aid of the pigeons by February it was mainly skeletal but a bit of early nitrogen and good weather it has picked up well and now looks fantastic. It had a long flowering period this year which my honeybees really appreciated, they’ve done a great job of pollenating it. Here’s hopeful for a reasonable yield. The winter beans are looking strong, drilled with our 4 metre Claydon hybrid drill, some after the plough on some dirty BG ground and some after a light cultivation 50mm deep with a Horsch Joker on the cleaner ground. 

    Germination and vigour seem higher after the plough which may lead us to ploughing a bit more next year. I know I’ve just used the P swear word in this publication, but you’ve got to go with what you see on the ground, harvest will tell us what’s right or wrong I hope. The forward crop and wet weather have lead us to applying the first fungicide for chocolate spot a couple of weeks early. It’ll be interesting to see if it ends up getting an extra spray because of this, here’s hoping not, to try and keep costs down. 

    We have a small amount of Southwalk winter oats drilled the third week of November with our Kverneland Evo drill as the damp conditions were not suitable for the Avatar. They looked pretty grim all winter, so we went with a bit of early N in February and this has seen them pick up very well to a point where they have needed a robust PGR to mitigate against potential lodging. 32 hectares of spring barley was direct drilled in mid-April after a grazed cover crop but this doesn’t look so good. 

    The decision was taken not to roll it after drilling due to the very damp seed bed conditions. It seems this and the cover crop have lead to a boom in the slug population, which in turn have had quite a feast on the young seedlings. This is something we need to look at a bit harder and try to choose our cover crop mix a little better, trying not to incorporate species that encourage slugs. I think Phacelia should be the base and add in a few others. Overall, the farm is looking good but due to the wet spring Black Grass can be seen all too easily. 

    Like many other farmers, we’ve been relatively successful over the last few years at controlling it but, as many are seeing this year, it’s come back with a vengeance. I’m sure there will be quite a lot of ploughs working this summer to press the reset button as the boffins call it. For spraying operations, we have recently purchased a new John Deere R975i powr spray trailed machine. This has also been accompanied by a new 6R215 John Deere tractor. The two units as one compliment each other very well and I’m very pleased with the set up. So far this spring the sprayer has done around 3000Ha of spraying. No liquid fertiliser is applied through the sprayer only ag chemicals and micro nutrition. I’m particularly pleased with the upgraded joystick which is significantly easier to use.

     Reversing trailed sprayers into corners is never easy and this has been made easier with the rear wheels self-straightening when the tractor is put into reverse, no more fiddly buttons to press in every corner. As far as filling is concerned, I mainly fill from base at Kislingbury. We have 40000 litres of water in two tanks I can draw from filled from a bore hole. This is normally enough to keep the sprayer filled even when I’m doing pre ems at 200 litres/ha. For back up there are also several satellite tanks around the farm. 

    As we are in a hard water area, we have to watch for pesticide lock up and sometimes have to add water conditioners to some tank mixes to counteract this. When filling the tank, the active pause option on the R975i allows plenty of time to add all the chemicals as it slows the water flow to around 60 litres/minute. When all the chemical is in I simply push the button on the console and it fills again at 1200litres/minute. When fully loaded the sprayer weighs around 13 tonnes so we went for the 710 tyres to spread as much weight as possible when the going is not so good in the winter/early spring. Even these this year were not enough to stop some deep ruts being created in March and April that will need rectifying after harvest. For summer work these are switched for 480’s, the tractor also runs the same setup. 

    The sprayer is fitted with TwinSelect nozzle units running with 3 metre GPS auto shut off which suit us better than individual shutoff. In the future I’d like to look at PWM, but this was not available on this machine at time of purchase. The wind this spring has been particularly challenging. To help applications in less than favourable conditions I can choose 035 Guardian air nozzles running around 1.8 bar pressure at 12 KPH delivering 100L/Ha. When conditions are better, I can choose 025 Guardian air nozzles running around 4 bar pressure delivering 100L/Ha at 12 KPH. With TwinSelect if I require 200 litres/Ha I can run both together. For pre-em spraying I can choose either 05 3D defy or 05 UDL for low drift. All these nozzles are fitted to the boom constantly as there are five nozzle holders. 

    The fifth is taken up with a 03 3D defy. Keeping the boom half a metre above the crop is vital in windy conditions to avoid drift and this is done automatically by the Norac system which I find runs well. After four months spraying with the new unit, I’m very pleased. It is a bit of a monster when you are stood next to it, but it doesn’t matter what sprayer you have now if you want capacity it’s going to be big.

  • Reduce drift with HORSCH Leeb sprayer innovations.

    HORSCH has updated its sprayers in each class to offer the highest performance. Close-nozzle spacing, pneumatic nozzle control and advanced cleaning systems are available across all HORSCH Leeb sprayers but at the heart of its sprayer innovation is its award-winning BoomControl system, an advanced boom design that keeps the boom rock steady and as close to the crop as possible.

    In addition to BoomControl, AutoSelect and PrecisionSpray create an advanced suite of tools that ensure chemical application is very efficient and productivity is high.

    Precision boom control up to 54m

    The HORSCH Leeb BoomControl system is a renowned sprayer technology. All HORSCH Leeb mounted, trailed and self-propelled sprayers feature the unique system for exact sprayer boom positioning. Booms from 18m to 54m are held steady at less than 40cm above the crop at speeds up to 30kph, even on hilly terrain.

    Three versions are available: BoomControl, BoomControl Pro and BoomControl ProPlus. BoomControl automatically maintains an exact, lowest possible working height even at high operational speeds. Boom is completely decoupled from the vehicle and held securely below a target area height of 40cm thanks to active adaption of the boom to the terrain via to two boom-tip sensors.

    BoomControl Pro expands on this capability by adding active boom adaption via tilt and height control of the middle section. Using four sensors from boom tip to the middle section, greater terrain following is possible by the parallel angling of the boom arms in combination with the rotation of the middle section.

    BoomControl ProPlus goes even further with active adaption of the boom middle section via the tilt and height control and double variable geometry of boom sections. This enables each of the boom section across the boom to lift and lower individually for the closest terrain following.

    James Casswell farms at Horbling, Lincolnshire and runs a Leeb 7 GS with BoomControl Pro and remarks, “We expected it to be good, but the low levels of drift are unbelievable. The boom stability is amazing. The guys were spraying on a quite windy day and there was no movement under the boom.”

    A powerful nozzle control system

    AutoSelect is HORSCH’s own nozzle control system. In addition to the nozzle and the pressure range, the operator can also adjust the target area spacing. Multiple nozzle carriers and a 25 cm partition on the nozzle bar provide a wide range of possibilities.

    Individual or even different nozzle places may be combined into nozzle profiles and up to 16 profiles can be controlled automatically. This allows the operator to ensure the optimum pressure range for the nozzle or the nozzle combination that is used, and that the optimum target area spacing is maintained if the operational speed changes. The boom height can be automatically adapted based on the nozzle spacings that are defined in the nozzle profiles. More nozzles give the operator a wider range of options.

    AutoSelect Pro adds curve compensation for operators not wishing to use pulse width modulation (PWM). By selecting differing nozzle types through the turn, AutoSelect Pro adjusts the spray volume across the boom length to allow for varying boom speed.

    PrecisionSpray uses the latest generation pulse width modulation

    HORSCH PrecisionSpray pulse nozzle system is available on all Leeb PT self-propelled and Leeb LT and GS trailed sprayers. “Although PWM has been available for some time from various manufacturers, PrecisionSpray is one of the first to integrate the technology completely into our own HORSCH sprayer software without requiring third-party controllers, making it easier to use.” explains Stephen Burcham, general manager at HORSCH UK.

    PrecisionSpray uses the latest generation pulse width modulation nozzle controls to ensure spray volumes are consistent across the field despite variations in sprayer speed or changes in boom speed when turning. As a sprayer turns the speed of the boom across the ground is dramatically faster on the outside than the inside, and the effect is increased as the boom widths get greater. PrecisionSpray’s curve compensation alters the spray volume proportionally across the boom length to ensure the same volume of spray per square metre from the inside to the outside of the turn.

    In addition to curve compensation, PrecisionSpray offers stepless adaption of the volume flow at constant pressure and drop size and can adapt the application rate without changing the spray characteristics.

  • Anglesey contractor expands with KUHN sprayer

    An Anglesey contractor has invested in a KUHN mounted sprayer to replace his Knight K1840 self-propelled machine. Fuel and time saving has since seen him cover the whole of the island and take on work in North Wales.

    At 18 years old, Rhys Jones took on his father’s local contracting business in 2015. With only a handful of spraying contractors on the island, he immediately saw an opportunity to grow the business by increasing the radius he operated.

    “The work was there, and I had the Knight, but I soon realised it was uneconomical to cover the whole island using a self-propelled. I looked at trailed alternatives, but the costs were too high, so I settled on the KUHN Altis 2002. It operates at 12km/h in the field, which is similar to the self-propelled, but on the road I can travel at 50-60km/h which makes covering the island much easier,” he explained.

    The Altis offered the chance to add another tractor to the business which now runs a Valtra T234, and a N174 which is the principal tractor for the sprayer. With auto shut-off, 24 metre gullwing booms, a 2200 litre rear tank and 1500 litre front tank, the Altis was similar to the self-propelled but has provided a significant fuel and time saving to Mr Jones.

    “The steel booms on the old machine were heavy and it was slower on the road. Having two tanks means I can use the front to carry water which saves trips when I am on farm. If I cover three or four farms in a day, the time saving can be up to two hours. Also, on the road I have halved my fuel bill, saving 8-9 litres an hour which, with the rise in fuel prices, is a significant cost saving,” he said.

    Operating from the family beef farm on the northern most point of Anglesey, Mr Jones has chosen to expand the business to cover the whole island and beyond to make best use of his machinery purchases. Working predominantly on small farms with small fields, he has found the Altis to be the perfect choice.

    “The A-frame means I can hitch in five minutes. The booms are quick to open and close and the gullwing design means less wear and tear over time. The best feature is the DILUSET cleaning function which enables me to start the cleaning of both tanks from the cab using the 170 litre front clean water tank and the 300 litre rear tank. It’s particularly good if I am changing from a weed killer to a foliar fertiliser, which is often the case on grassland,” he said.

    Auto shut-off on the Altis makes spraying small fields significantly easier for Mr Jones. He has also installed a nozzle on the end of each boom to spray hedges at headlands. The accuracy, manoeuvrability and added benefit of headland spraying has been well received by his customers because he can also control weeds in the hedges.

    “With the auto shut-off I realised that I could fit wider nozzles to the ends of the booms and shut down everything else. This means that when I turn at the headland, the end nozzle will spray into the hedgerows which means my customers don’t have to use knapsacks or ATV sprayers,” he said.

    To reduce drift, he added 04 nozzles. The stability of the boom is good, not quite that of the steel booms on the self-propelled machine but it is a small compromise for the weight saving he has achieved.

    ‘I would never go back to steel because of the weight. Each boom on the Altis is in two sections, as opposed to three or even four on some 24 metre machines. Every joint is a potential problem area in my opinion, so this configuration is preferable when you are looking for long-term reliability,” he said.

    The Altis, like many of Kuhn’s sprayers, has aluminium booms, which offer an effective combination of strength without excessive weight. The machine is notable for its suspended mounting, which reduces the stresses on the machine when in transport. More damage is done to sprayers in transport than when in use in the field, so this is another important advantage for Mr Jones, who travels long distances and has limited time for repairs.

    Mr Jones now sprays 2000 hectares across the island. Most is grassland, but he covers 200 hectares of maize and a small area of arable crops too. His aim is to bring on a full-time employee. However, finding labour on Anglesey is no easy task.

    “Construction and office work pays better than agriculture so many young people have left Anglesey. Those still here, work on their own farms, so finding someone who can work full time is going to be tricky when the time comes,” he said.

  • Low Drift : No Drift –  The BFS Options 

    The key aim of Regen Agriculture is to farm more sustainably, both in terms of soil biology in the ground, and profitability of the farm.

    Key to this is:

    • Minimising mechanical soil disturbance and seeding directly into untilled soil
    • Enhancing and maintaining carbon rich organic matter on the soil surface using crops, cover crops or crop residues  
    • Reducing  inputs where appropriate, and using them more effectively
    • Product choice – be it varieties with greater disease resistance, fertilisers with less impact on soil flora and fauna, and with greater nitrogen use efficiency, down to nozzle choice when applying pesticides and foliar nutrients

    It may seem an anathema for a regen magazine to be talking about spray nozzles, but you have to remember that regen agriculture currently still depends upon the continued use of glyphosate at least. And regen farming is not necessarily “organic” farming – we still expect high crop yields, which depend on the use of herbicides and fungicides. Yes the aim is to minimize their use, and if appropriate omit the application (especially of insecticides) all together.

    So, if we have to apply pesticides, there is no point at all in allowing these to stray over the crop edge, where they can adversely affect the adjacent habitats and waterways. Quite apart from the financial cost of lost active ingredient, there can be significant damage to wild plants, insects and mammals.

    BFS have been at the forefront in the development of low drift nozzle technology, having introduced the first air inclusion nozzle range in the mid nineteen nineties, namely the BFS Air Bubble Jet. These revolutionized low drift spraying on farm by making “Air Tech” technology affordable to any farmer, simply by utilizing the principle of induction. This is where the pressurized flow of spray liquid draws in air through specific air inlets molded into the nozzle body. These nozzles could easily replace existing nozzles, so any sprayer could become LERAP compliant relatively easily and cheaply.

    When introduced, Air Bubble Jets reduced the level of drift relative to a flat fan nozzle, by 75%. The effect of this was a massive reduction in non-target contamination by spray drift. Since then we have brought in a 90% less drift air inclusion nozzle, the BFS ExRay XC, making drift an unnecessary occurrence. The days of using the original, drift prone flat fan nozzles are severely limited, and really should only be used in perfect spraying conditions where drift will not occur.

    Even when applying nutrients and foliar nitrogen to crops, coverage of the target plants is of paramount importance. Low Drift nozzles should always be used. We should never be spreading these products into the grass margins and upsetting the fine balance of nature that lies there. We do not want to encourage very competitive, aggressive weeds that could smother small, native flowering plants.

    Nozzle choice is only one aspect of drift reduction programs. Our advice to reduce drift to the bare minimum:

    • Select a 4 Star rated LERAP nozzle like the BFS ExRay XC, or at minimum a 3 Star rated BFS Air Bubble Jet
    • Do not spray in windy weather. A light breeze is preferable. Never spray if spray droplets are heading towards sensitive margins
    • Use a higher volume of water through a nozzle with a larger orifice. This produces larger, less drift prone droplets. BFS have a wide range of larger output nozzles
    • Slow down – there is less air movement to affect the smaller droplets
    • Lower the boom, but consistent with the double overlap from adjacent nozzles required, reduces the time it takes a droplet to travel from the nozzle to the target, which is critical – the shorter the time, the less risk of drift
    • Alternate adjacent nozzles to face forward 30 degrees forward (BFS produce a 30 degree angled cap) and straight down. There will be less impact between the fan pattern from adjacent nozzles, which causes small droplet formation and thus, potentially higher drift
    • Lower the operating pressure, but within the nozzle parameters, to create larger droplets less prone to drift
    • Eighty degree nozzles naturally produce fewer smaller, diftable droplets, so use these if your sprayer is suitable (25cm or 33cm nozzle body spacing)

    On a similar environmentally friendly note, BFS also manufacture liquid fertiliser application caps and bars. Again these are so much better for the environment where they can place nitrogen and sulphur accurately and precisely right up to the crop edge, and no further. Again not encouraging aggressive weeds from the boundary.

    The BFS AutoStreamer bars are variable rate compatible so accurate targeting is possible, resulting is less fertiliser usage. This, coupled with accurate foliar nitrogen placement by Air Bubble Jets, makes the whole BFS system more environmentally acceptable.

    The BFS 5 Star and Nova ranges  can be utilised for delivering fertiliser in a band, where it is easily found and absorbed by plant roots as they are germinating and becoming established. These will  fit those cultivator type drills with liquid delivery systems, placing the fertiliser behind a coulter in a narrow band. This allows you to reduce the overall application rate of product per hectare, but also you are not encouraging weed growth between the rows. Definitely part of the regen ethos.

    BFS products are all designed, manufactured and quality tested here in the UK. So fewer air miles and less impact on the environment. Quality British products.

  • Latest Rogator Sprayers offer Practical Operator Improvements

    The latest versions of Fendt’s self-propelled Rogator sprayer are now available with new features to improve boom stability, reduce cleaning times and maintenance, while increasing component longevity.

    Central to the upgrades is a redesigned plumbing system featuring a separate clean water pump allowing a new ContiRinse system to cut overall tank cleaning times after spraying. The system works on two adjustable liquid volume thresholds, with the first initiating cleaning of plumbing lines that contain chemical residues whilst the operator continues spraying, without affecting the spraying process. The second threshold is closer to the end of the tank load and activates the remaining part of the cleaning cycle as the tank empties, reducing the need to transfer water and flush the system after spraying. 

    Sam Treadgold is sales engineer for sprayers at Fendt and explains the benefits of the new feature: “ContiRinse is designed to reduce the downtime spent cleaning and rinsing the plumbing system after spraying, making it quicker to change between products and crops. The additional clean water pump allows the pre-rinse cycle to begin whilst spraying and there is now an auto pump shutoff, which switches off the main 785l/ min pump after cleaning to prevent it running dry.”

    New nozzles and valves 

    All Rogator models are now fitted with new Altek electro-pneumatic nozzle bodies as standard, which replace the fully electric Arag versions. These are compatible with Fendt’s OptiNozzle automatic nozzle selection system which uses different nozzles to maintain pressure and reduce drift, while allowing increased forward speed. Also using the new bodies are a single line Hypro five-way rotary, an Altek twin-line, and an Altek quad-line setup. The valves on the Rogator are now supplied by Banjo. 

    Mr Treadgold continues: “The changes to our spray systems will increase longevity and reliability of the machines. The new nozzle bodies don’t have diaphragms and feature no dead volume areas, so liquid or chemical residues can’t sit inside the bodies after use. The electro-pneumatic design also provides increased reliability compared with our old units.”

    Boom stability has been improved with six OptiSonic height sensors – previously four – to keep the booms automatically adjusted in uneven crops, increasing application accuracy. The central sensor has been repositioned away from the rear axle to keep it free from debris. In the VisioCab, the Rogator now gets the option of a dedicated fridge, keeping contents chilled down to 0°c. 

    The cab comes with category 4 filtration as standard, so the operator is well protected. There is an improved handsfree system with a centrally located gooseneck microphone to improve call clarity, while stronger mirror mounts reduce vibrations on rough terrain.

    Single piece chassis 

    The self-propelled Rogator machines are all underpinned by the same onepiece chassis and driveline setup, as Mr Treadgold explains. “The tailored single-frame chassis design has several key advantages in the field. When the sprayer is loaded and the booms are unfolded, the machine registers a perfect 50:50 weight distribution, with the positioning of the engine and spray tank key to allowing the weight to be spread across the whole machine.” 

    Benefits of the design include reduced soil compaction and ability to travel in less favourable conditions, and, as all the machines use the same layout, servicing and maintenance is also made easier. Mr Treadgold continues: “The design of the tank has further advantages as it allows the Rogator to achieve a steering angle of 35 degrees and an inner turn radius of 3.14m, which increases manoeuvrability. This means that crop damage is kept to a minimum, with tighter headland turns achievable to reduce the need to reverse into tramlines on awkward shaped short works.”

    Rogator range 

    Fendt’s Rogator machines are the sole offering from the brand in crop protection machinery and the range consists of three models – 645, 655 and 665 – all feature Pommier aluminium booms in widths from 24-39m. Tank options start with the 3,850-litre model and finish with the 6,000-litre unit, which is the only option on the largest Rogator 665. Power comes from a six-cylinder AGCO Power engine with outputs varying from 210hp up to 307hp, depending on the model. 

    Fendt’s HydroStar CVT transmission powers all models and, as Mr Treadgold says, the integrated Control Drive System (CDS) only uses the power the Rogator requires, helping to trim fuel use. “The drivetrain consists of a variable displacement pump and wheel motors to deliver the exact amount of oil depending on the ground speed and torque at any given moment, controlled via the CDS. This allows the speed of each wheel to be adjusted independently for automatic traction control and, when run with the automatic engine RPM, which works like Fendt’s TMS system, it can help keep fuel consumption to a minimum,” concludes Mr Treadgold.

  • Hardie Twin Force

    Want to save time, money and reduce your environmental impact during spraying operations? The TWIN FORCE boom from HARDI employs the world’s best system for spray control. Using an adjustable curtain of air to entrain and direct the spray, TWIN FORCE can reduce drift by an astounding 80% in comparison to standard boom configurations. The result is close to no loss of plant protection products or contamination of adjacent areas, saving the grower money and ensuring peace of mind that their crop is consistently and successfully targeted. Air-assisted spraying also guarantees more accurate spray penetration and coverage than conventional applications. All this translates into real savings for the farmer of at least 50% on water usage and up to 30% on plant protection products.

    TWIN FORCE booms from HARDI gets the job done faster. Efficient drift control means more spraying days – studies prove an average increase from up from 31 to 76 spray days – as well as higher application speeds and fewer refilling stops. The result is higher sprayer productivity.

    As well as an increase in efficiency, HARDI TWIN FORCE gives the operator more options for spray control than other air-assisted sprayers. By adjusting the air curtain’s speed and angle, from no air to full air, in effect producing two sprayers in one (hence the name – TWIN), the operator can guide all droplets, irrespective of size, to the target. Two powerful blower units provide air to the left and right side of the boom. Each blower can be automatically adjusted to a maximum output of 2,000 m³/h per metre of boom and a maximum air speed of 35 m/sec.

    Weather dictates almost everything a farmer does, and spraying is no exception. Wind in particular can force a farmer to interrupt or postpone spraying due to the ultimate risk of drift. With efficient drift control, this is factor can become a thing of the past. Not only does air-assisted spraying prevent small droplets from drifting by blowing them downwards. It also opens the crops canopy to encourage better penetration. The air curtain parts and rustles the crop to expose all surfaces to the spray, and the droplets’ extra momentum created by the air propels them into the crop.

    The outstanding performance of TWIN FORCE has been confirmed by numerous case studies from around the world along with field trials and studies. One independent, scientific study from the Research Centre Flakke-bjerg/Aarhus University, Denmark, demonstrated that the spray application quality of a HARDI TWIN sprayer with a 24-metre boom was unaffected by high wind at driving speeds of 8 to 12 km/h.

    The researchers concluded that TWIN gives a more uniform deposition and significantly lower drift than conventional applications, especially in windy conditions. The study confirmed that TWIN can reduce spray drift by up to 80% – translating into a reduction in use of chemical products of up to 30%.

    HARDI however are determined to further enhance growers’ savings with spraying technologies and in-house developed techniques, available from the original crop care specialists. Needless to say, the manufacturers can now prevent under and over-dosing with their PWM system, ‘HARDI PulseSystem’. The HARDI PulseSystem is the future of application technologies, currently available on the conventional DELTA FORCE boom on AEON and NAVIGATOR, plus the TWIN boom on AEON.

    Together with the TWIN boom configuration on the HARDI AEON, which already has best-in-class drift reduction and penetration characteristics, the Danish in-house manufactured pulse-width modulation system, HARDI PulseSystem is an essential additional step forward in controlling where pesticides are applied directly from the driver’s seat. Combining two innovative drift-reducing technologies, HARDI has developed an application solution with the potential to deliver spray directly into the crop where the plant needs it, with minimal drift, thus improving efficiency and reducing costs for the grower.

    By opening and closing the nozzles, the HARDI PulseSystem can keep the nozzles open from 30-100% at the same pressure flow while ensuring the droplet size is unaffected, regardless of working speeds. Drift is also minimised while the flow rate is optimised, as the desired droplet size can be maintained throughout spraying operations.

    In addition, the PulseSystem works with a single nozzle on/off – at a width of 36m, control of all 72 nozzles at a single nozzle level. This can be done via a digital field map – and savings of up to 90% are possible by treating only the desired areas within the field.

    Built onto the new HARDI AEON CenturaLine, HARDI’s high-tech sprayer, developed in guidance by the principles of lean farming – to do more with less, HARDI presents the latest in sprayer innovations. Available with tank capacity of 4200 and 5200 litres, and boom widths from 24 to 39 metres, the AEON is the solution to the future of crop care for the forward-thinking farmer.

    HARDI have used the latest technology and the most up-to-date automation solutions to allow farmers to improve productivity while reducing drift and chemical loss with the CenturaLine product line. The HARDI AEON sets a new benchmark for increasing food production in the face of growing environmental and climatic concerns.

    The starting point when developing new machines at HARDI is always the farmer, and the AEON CenturaLine is no different. The AEON is designed to be user-friendly and with optimal safety in mind. As with the whole HARDI product range, the new AEON is built to last, without compromising on design. It is a stand-out machine with a sleek and dynamic modern look. The newly developed chassis and unique tank design provide maximum stability both in the field and on the road.

  • Agrifac Technology

    Growers need the guarantee that chemicals are sprayed with the desired rate in the right place, so the solution can work to protect and feed the right plants in the exact location necessary. Over the years, Agrifac have continuously worked alongside the grower to fulfil innovative solutions in the form of spraying technology to aid in this guarantee. Developed, manufactured and proven in-house, Agrifac technologies are meticulously designed based on years of research both in the field and in the farm office alongside growers. Dedicated to ensuring the highest quality yield without compromising on quantity, Agrifac’s tailored solutions are proving beneficial worldwide, as the company soars ahead of competitors as the only manufacturer to offer in-house solutions built into the machine during production; streamlining the assurance of having one point of contact for all machine questions throughout the customers’ ownership experience.

    Since self-propelled crop sprayer production began at Agrifac nearly 30 years ago, machines have always been manufactured to offer the most stable chassis on the market; Agrifac call this StabiloPlus. This patented chassis design prevents the boom from swaying on uneven terrain and reduces tracking by ensuring equal weight distribution across all four wheels, ensuring operator comfort and peace of mind that the boom is working at perfect harmony parallel to the crop. StabiloPlus also assures an ideal weight distribution in all situations for optimum traction and the least possible ground pressure. Through its low weight and low centre of gravity, the sprayer can also maintain its standard high ground clearance of 125cm during road transport. Thanks to this proven patented base design, growers are safe in the knowledge that their machines are built on a strong foundation.

    Adding to the balance of the machine and contributing further to the stability of the spray boom, Agrifac developed a naturally balanced J-boom which is standardly equipped on all Condor variants. The boom is naturally balanced, meaning that no overbearing balance system must be developed: Brilliant Simple. The Agrifac J-boom rolls freely over a moon-shaped suspension which ensures that the boom is perfectly in balance at all times: Agrifac call this BalancePlus. To further improve the balance under all spraying conditions, Agrifac developed the StrictHeightPlus height control system. With this system, BalancePlus and variable geometry work in harmony to keep the boom free hanging in all situations. Therefore, the boom can move freely, and the movements of the machine, even in rough and uneven terrain, are not passed onto the boom, resulting in the calmest and most stable boom ride possible, ensuring boom balance and improving spray quality. Due to the full integration in the EcoTronicPlus user interface control system, it is very easy to use.

    This fully integrated boom control system from Agrifac guarantees the chosen distance to the crop is consistently maintained. By using four wide view sensors on the boom, Agrifac machines receive a reliable and accurate measurement of the crop. The benefit of using wide view sensors is simple: a wide view gives a better overview of the crop. This means that the system can ‘read’ the situation better and it will not be affected by irregularities in the crop. This leads to no crop damage and optimal spraying quality as the boom stays at the correct pre-set height. The full integration with Agrifac’s BalancePlus system enables the boom to stay completely balanced, which means that machine movements will not impact the boom. Together with the variable geometry and the accurate reading from the sensors, it makes StrictHeightPlus the most accurate and advanced height control system on the market, resulting in a more accurate spraying height, better spray quality and longer machine lifetime.

    Need a solution to help control a consistent rate of application across the whole field without compromise? With Agrifac’s in-house PWM system StrictSprayPlus you can and will apply perfect amounts everywhere every time. StrictSprayPlus has three characteristics which help it to apply the exact amounts. Single nozzle sections to prevent overlapping, overdosing and allows each nozzle to be switched on/off individually. Turn compensation for 100% coverage is achieved by ensuring a consistent spray rate when making a turn, determined by fast and slow-moving nozzles, depending on the placement and swoop of the boom. Pressure independent rate control is also executed by changing the flow rate automatically, keeping the spray pattern and droplet size the same irrespective of speed or pressure.

    In order to achieve all this, StrictSprayPlus calculates the speed and required spraying rate for every nozzle. These values are used to determine how much every single nozzle needs to spray. The flow is controlled by changing the time the fast (up to 100 times a second) switching nozzle body is open and closed. By varying the frequency and the open/close ratio the final rate per nozzle is established. Due to the ability to change the opening and closing time individually, the number of switches per second is as low as possible, but as high as necessary. This ensures the spray pattern is always accurate, while the lifespan of the valves is extended.

  • Direct Driller Issue 21 – Introduction

    Written by Mike Donovan

    Downside pressures increase

    Every farming year has its ups and downs and in many ways 2022 didn’t perform too badly. The cost of inputs was certainly a real hit, but were to an extent balanced by the increase in crop values. Interest rates rose rapidly following inflation, but from an historic low figure and they were expected to decline as the new prices of gas, fuel and food became historical. What happens if inflation stays constant? Will we be punished by higher borrowing? And how much can some farmers take? Despite the seemingly poor performance of UK plc when compared with other economies recovering from the pandemic (we also had the Brexit negatives to ride) we still have an economy that enjoys high employment and reasonable levels of trade.

    The 2023 New Year opened with the traditional fireworks and a sense that events were under control. The vaccines had protected the population; Ukraine and global finances would settle down, and many of us anticipated a period of calm. We had survived. And then another balloon goes up.

    There’s a run on Silicon Valley Bank, a specialist bank used by the high risk tech sector with clients who are fleet of foot when it comes to money. SVB depositors withdrew their funds as if there was no tomorrow. The news spread like wildfire and the bank was all but bust in a couple of days, and was sold for $1. Less than a month later a second bank, Credit Swisse reports something similar. Business competition rules are swiftly changed so their Swiss competitor, UBS, could pick up the pieces.

    What has this got to do with farming? Commodity prices are moved by every kind of event. Farmers who follow the markets are saying that downside risks – prices moving lower – are far easier to spot than upside. Agriculture is increasing dependent on finance and selling crops forward reduces farm debt, but adds to downside pressure.  Farmers want or need to borrow and banks and finance companies are willing to lend, with loans backed by farm assets. Interest rates of 1% have been transformed to 4, 5, or 6%. Quadruple interest at the same time as farm inputs such as fuel and fertiliser are doubled, and you have a tough situation. In past decades we could expect government to step in, but minister Therese Coffey has been definite, turning down any request from the sector. Worst case scenario? Farmers will need to farm the downside, shed assets and do what they can to cut costs in order to create a new balance sheet.

    The post Pandemic flush has been short lived. We’re back where we were in 2008 and 2001 when world finances went topsy-turvy.

  • The New Normal

    Written by Chris Fellows

    We certainly confused a few in the last issue with the title change.  As you can see, we are back to normal now (see what we did there).  But the point stands, regen agriculture is everywhere right now and Defra have made it more profitable than ever.  Thus, every other publication is now jumping on the regen bandwagon and the processes and concepts are becoming normalised. 

    However never fear – here comes the new normal.  Because, having met our readers, I know they are anything but normal.  They continually push the boundaries of what is possible.  They look for better ways to farm both in terms of the environment and their profits. They were already cutting nitrogen applications before prices skyrocketed.  They have always been looking for ways to change.

    I think this ability to change or indeed, a desire to change sets many of the readers of this magazine apart from the wider of the farming community.  Farming is slow to change. It is why the government have so often resorted to the stick approach than a carrot.  Hence the offer from Defra to pay farmers to become more environmentally friendly is interesting.  Will the carrot approach work and drive more farmers to change?  The increased readership of the magazine in the last couple of months suggests it might.  But only time will tell.

    Here’s to the next 5 years and covering all the new amazing ways you find to farm your land and to every reader becoming that bit more profitable and sustainable.  Let’s continue to keep the wider farming community on their toes and always lead the way.  Whether this is in the privacy of your own operation or if you choose to speak at events, hold open days or get on YouTube.  We have seen so many of you become our true farming leaders.  Keep up the amazing work and I promise not to ever call you normal again!

  • From Precision to Autonomy: How AI is Helping Farmers Tackle the Biggest Challenges in Agriculture

    As a farmer, I have always been interested in new technologies that could make my job easier and more efficient. One of the most exciting new technologies in agriculture today is Artificial Intelligence (AI). AI is a broad term that encompasses many different technologies such as machine learning, natural language processing, and robotics. These technologies are designed to mimic human intelligence and decision-making processes.

    AI has the potential to revolutionize the way we farm by solving both agronomical and practical logistical issues. One area where AI could be particularly useful is in crop management. By analysing data on soil quality, weather patterns, and crop growth rates, AI could help farmers make more informed decisions about when to plant, fertilize, and harvest crops. This could result in higher yields and more efficient use of resources such as fertilizer and water.

    Another area where AI could be helpful is in pest management. By analysing data on pest populations and their behaviour patterns, AI could help farmers make more informed decisions about when and how to apply pesticides. This could lead to more effective pest control and reduce the amount of pesticides that need to be used.

    AI could also be used to optimize the use of farm machinery. By analysing data on field conditions and the performance of farm machinery, AI could help farmers make more informed decisions about when and how to use different pieces of equipment. This could result in more efficient use of fuel and other resources, as well as reduce the wear and tear on machinery.

    The Agricultural and Horticultural Development Board (AHDB) and Lincoln University are two UK-based organizations that have already started using AI in their research and development efforts. AHDB is using AI to analyse data on crop growth and soil quality, while Lincoln University has developed the “Digital Field Assistant” system that uses sensors and cameras to collect data on crop growth, soil quality, and pest populations. This data is then analysed by AI algorithms to provide farmers with real-time recommendations on how to optimize their operations.

    In addition to helping with agronomical decision making, AI could also help replace labour in certain areas of farming. For example, robots equipped with AI technology could be used to harvest crops, reducing the need for manual labour. This could be particularly helpful in areas where labour shortages are an issue. AI-powered robots could also be used to apply fertilizers or pesticides, reducing the risk of exposure to harmful chemicals for farmers.

    Another benefit of AI in agriculture is the potential for reducing the environmental impact of farming. By optimizing the use of resources such as water and fertilizer, AI could help reduce waste and improve sustainability. Additionally, AI-powered robots could be used to apply fertilizers and pesticides more accurately, reducing the risk of over-application and minimizing the amount of chemicals that end up in the environment.

    Precision agriculture is one of the most promising areas of AI in agriculture. Precision agriculture involves using data-driven insights to optimize farm operations, resulting in increased yields, reduced waste, and improved sustainability. AI can help farmers collect, analyse, and act on data in real-time, enabling them to make more informed decisions about crop management, resource allocation, and overall farm productivity.

    Precision agriculture can be used to optimize irrigation, fertilizer application, and crop protection. For example, by using soil moisture sensors and weather data, AI algorithms can help farmers optimize irrigation schedules and reduce water usage, resulting in cost savings and improved resource efficiency. Similarly, AI-powered analytics can help farmers apply fertilizers and pesticides more accurately, reducing the amount of chemicals needed while improving crop health and yield.

    Another promising area of AI in agriculture is autonomous farming. Autonomous farming involves using AI-powered robotics and drones to perform farm operations such as planting, harvesting, and crop monitoring. By automating these tasks, farmers can reduce labour costs,

    increase productivity, and improve safety. For example, autonomous tractors can plant and harvest crops without human intervention, freeing up farmers’ time for other tasks.

    In addition to these benefits, AI in agriculture can also help farmers buy inputs and sell outputs by looking for patterns in markets. By analysing data on market trends and prices, AI can help farmers make more informed decisions about when and where to buy inputs such as seeds, fertilizer, and pesticides. This could result in cost savings and improved efficiency. Similarly, AI can help farmers identify the best markets for their crops and adjust their production accordingly.

    AI can also help farmers manage their supply chains more effectively. By tracking crops from field to market, AI-powered analytics can help farmers and distributors optimize logistics, reduce waste, and improve profitability. For example, by analysing data on crop yields and market demand, AI algorithms can help farmers and distributors predict crop shortages and surpluses, allowing them to adjust their operations accordingly.

    Despite the many benefits of AI in agriculture, there are also some risks and challenges that need to be addressed. One of the biggest risks is the potential for AI to exacerbate existing inequalities in the agriculture industry. For example, smaller farmers may not have the resources to implement AI technologies, giving larger, more well-funded operations an unfair advantage.

    Another challenge is the need to develop AI technologies that are accessible and easy to use for farmers of all backgrounds and skill levels. This will require investment in education and training programs to ensure that farmers can effectively utilize AI-powered technologies.

    There are also concerns around data privacy and security. Farmers need to be confident that their data will be kept secure and will not be shared with third parties without their permission. There are also concerns about the potential for AI to be hacked or manipulated by malicious actors.

    To address these challenges, there needs to be a collaborative effort between farmers, researchers, and technology companies. Farmers need to be involved in the development of AI technologies to ensure that they are relevant and effective in real-world farming scenarios. Researchers need to work with farmers to collect and analyze data, while technology companies need to focus on developing AI technologies that are accessible, secure, and easy to use.

    In conclusion, AI has the potential to transform the agriculture industry by helping farmers make more informed decisions about crop management, resource allocation, and supply chain management. By increasing efficiency and productivity while reducing waste and improving sustainability, AI can help address some of the biggest challenges facing the agriculture industry today. Additionally, AI can help farmers buy inputs and sell outputs by looking for patterns in markets, resulting in cost savings and improved profitability. However, it is important to proceed with caution and address the risks and challenges associated with AI in agriculture. With careful planning and investment, AI can help create a more efficient, sustainable, and equitable agriculture sector for the future.

    Confession: I didn’t write this article. It was actually written by ChatGPT, a large language model trained by OpenAI.  I simply gave it a brief of the subject I would like it to write “as me”.  If you didn’t realize that before reading this confession, it’s an indication of just how powerful AI already is, even in its early stages of development.

    As a farmer and contributor to Direct Driller magazine, I’m excited about the potential of AI in agriculture. It’s clear that AI can help us make more informed decisions about crop management, resource allocation, and supply chain management. By increasing efficiency and productivity while reducing waste and improving sustainability, AI can help address some of the biggest challenges facing the agriculture industry today.

    I’ve been following the development of AI in agriculture for some time now, and it’s clear that there’s a lot of potential for this technology to transform the industry. From climate change adaptation to precision farming to autonomous farming, AI is already being used in many different ways to help farmers improve their operations.

    Of course, there are also risks and challenges associated with AI in agriculture. As I mentioned earlier, there’s a risk that AI could exacerbate existing inequalities in the industry, and there are concerns around data privacy and security. It’s important that we address these challenges and work together to ensure that AI is used in a responsible and ethical way.

    Overall, I’m optimistic about the future of AI in agriculture. I believe that this technology has the potential to create a more efficient, sustainable, and equitable agriculture sector for the future. By continuing to invest in research and development, and by working collaboratively to address the challenges associated with AI in agriculture, we can create a better future for farmers and for the planet as a whole.

  • New Direct Driller Website

    In January we launched the all-new Direct Driller Magazine Website.  You can now read articles from every issue of Direct Driller over the past 5 years (well you will when we have finished loading them all up).  Issues 1-6 and 18-21 are all already live.  This should make it much easier for you to share articles on social media or with your friends via email. We have included a QR Code in the contents section to link you to the content page on the new website.

    As always, all content we have ever published is free to read to farmers worldwide.  So please do keep sharing.  Content is organised by Issue and by “Category”. 

    We have also created authors pages, if you have written for us then you will have your own page with all your content show in reverse chronological order with newest at the top. That means all of our Farmer Focus Writers have their own page where all there content is (or will be once issues 7-17 have been loaded up).  You can get to a writer’s page by simply clicking on their name at the top of an article. 

    The next step for the website to allow you to edit your account with us to update your own shipping address.  Where you are a TFF member already this will combine with that account (assuming you have used the same email for both), you won’t be required to have an additional login to remember.  This will make all your account management much easier and save you have to email in with your address updates.

    As always, if you think there are any other ways we could improve the site, we will continue to evolve it going forward.

  • Farmer Focus – Andrew Jackson

    April 2023 Edition

    When Chris asked me to write this article, I gravitated into panic mode because this is a quiet part of the year and I was not sure what to write about, however we seem to have been continuously busy, so I had better fill you in on our out of season activities.

    In order to achieve one of the principles of regenerative agriculture where grazing livestock can be returned to graze within an arable rotation, I decided to perimeter fence our two farms with a view to eventually fencing individual fields. This would be funded by grants when available, or by not spending thousands of pounds on phosphate and potash fertiliser. I am working on the principle that we may have sixty years of phosphate reserves within our soils, and we just need to stop disturbing the fungi within the soil so that they can access the nutrient and feed it to the plant roots. The same may be said for potash, however I do plan to react to Sap tests and apply foliar potash when required. I seem to have managed to fall out with two or three fencing contractors, so I needed a system where we could erect fences ourselves with the skill set of our farm staff, (Carl, Anna, and myself).

    Having spent days throughout my career patching up livestock fences where the wooden posts have rotted just below the surface of the ground, my attention was drawn to the steel post and Clipex stock netting which is supplied by McVeigh Parker. We erected a short distance of fence, and the appearance was very respectable and functional. Rolling out the netting and sinking some of the straining posts highlighted a few problem areas if we were to continue at scale. So I invested in a Quickfencer to roll out and tension the netting/ barbed wire, I also invested in a post knocker. I don’t envisage either of these items depreciating a huge amount of money and I could possibly sell them when my fences are complete.

     Just after Christmas we completed our first section of perimeter fence, and this has allowed us to graze three fields with ease and confidence. Other spin offs include hopefully deterring dogs from hassling or killing our sheep and pinning back the public to the public footpath. During lockdown there seemed to be a right to roam over the whole farm. Excitingly we now having sheep grazing our arable fields for the first time in more than one hundred years. Will there be a cost benefit to all this cost and effort, I can hear you say? The answer is that I don’t know. All I do know is that the soils have evolved over thousands of years with grazing animals and, at the risk of harping back to Gabe Brown’s Dirt to Soil book, he prescribed grazing, and it just feels right to me. We were lucky enough to go to the Groundswell site to listen to Gabe Brown and his two colleagues. We learnt bits here and there, but our climate is so different to theirs, so we just must believe in his principles and try to make them work in our climate and on our soils.

     In association with the film crew of ‘Six Inches of Soil’, a film that my daughter Anna is appearing in, we visited John Pawsey. There we spent a day discussing the differences and similarities between Regen farming and Organic farming. We had a common goal of producing wholesome crops and caring for the soil and if glyphosate ever gets banned, we may all be knocking on John’s door to see how we can manage our regen farming without one of the major chemicals within our armoury.

    On John’s farm Anna got the opportunity to sit in the cab with John’s ploughman Sam who was skilfully ploughing at only four inches deep, the very same depth that the horse drawn ploughs operated at. Indeed, the question at the back of many farmers minds may well be which is the worst of the two evils, a low dose of glyphosate or shallow/ slow ploughing? Gabe Brown does not do either but having been to hear him speak and read his book, I still don’t really know how we can achieve this goal. For a few years I have been buying Gabe’s books in lots of ten books at a time and giving a book to any farmer who shows an interest in Regen faming. I was not aware that Anna had told Gabe about my book donating strategy, and he personally signed a book for me, and Anna gave the signed book to me for Christmas.

    After Christmas we attended two conferences, the National Farm Attractions at Harrogate, and the BASE UK at Nottingham. Coincidentally, both featured the same motivational speaker, David Hyner. His presentation was slightly different for each conference, but the message from the Farm Attractions Conference was that you should strive for a goal and even if it is deemed impossible, this should not become a barrier to success. I hatched a plan and this must have been very different from all the Farm Attraction operators in the room. My plan was to strive for the impossible, to aim to grow a 10 T/Ha crop of wheat, direct drilled, without using fungicides, insecticides and applying only 100Kg/N/Ha.

     A ten-tonne crop per Hectare is a reasonable target using normal crop production techniques, but my goal was threefold. If achieved, the cost of production would be so low that the grower would almost certainly make money. If it could work with wheat, the system would work throughout the other crops within the rotation and lastly this achievement might make all those farmers who look over my hedge and wonder what the hell is he up to this time, think again.

    For some time, I have been considering setting up a regional/local cluster group, I have encountered many local farmers who may have read about Regenerative farming [MD3] [MD4] in the farming press. They understand the logic but would like to discuss the topic before making a leap. The 10 T/Ha ‘impossible’ goal made me think that by sharing the goal and asking others to carry out their own trials, there might be more chance of reaching a blueprint, before I retire or die.

    In February I attended a reunion of the 47th   Business Management Course of the Worshipful Company of Farmers. The host was Rob Shepherd, and the reunion was based near his farm in Salisbury. Rob has been working with Wessex Water to form a cluster group to examine the influence of agriculture on ground water, but also ways to improve biodiversity. Rob believes that there may be financial rewards through selling biodiversity and the cluster group or amalgamation of cluster groups may help bring this product to the marketplace. My thoughts are now that there could be other financial benefits from the creation of a regional cluster group.

    Although my trials last season using foliar nitrogen were not successful, I have spoken to other farmers who have had success. Joel Williams and David Aglen, both told me at the BASE UK Conference that the ten-tonne goal may well be achievable and after sitting in on Joel’s foliar nitrogen course, I strongly believe that foliar nitrogen will be part of the strategy.  Consequently, I have been to see two farmers who have been making nitrogen fertiliser by dissolving urea into water and researched the topic on the Farming Forum.

    One of the two farmers that I visited had not considered foliar application, his aim was just to make nitrogen fertiliser at a more competitive price, so if I struggle with the foliar, hopefully I will be making some financial savings. Currently I am on some sort of “Challenge Anneka” (the younger reader will have to Google this TV program), to convert my redundant Dutch barn into a fertiliser making plant for use in April.

    Anna spoke at the BASE UK Conference and after an afternoon of thought-provoking presentations, her light hearted look into her life and the start of her farming career went down well and many people offered complimentary comments. Last week we had our final filming with the ‘Six Inches of Soil’ crew. I believe that it went well, however I will never make an actor because of their failure to squeeze any emotion out of me for the film.

    In my other life I help my wife when required and sometimes when not required within the Pink Pig Farm Attraction. After visiting a beer festival in our local church, I came up with the idea of combining a beer festival with a music festival. To date I have come up with five bands, ordered additional toilets and we are now sampling beer from local breweries with a view to selling ten cask ales, one or two lagers and a cider. The date is May 20th and the tickets have been released, watch this space!!!


  • Kuhn: Drill Manifacturer Update

    3 in 1 with KUHN Espro

    The KUHN 3000R, 4000 R and 6000 R Espro models can be specified with two small seed hoppers enabling up to three different products to be drilled at two depths in just one pass.

    The smaller 3000 R offers a 2500 litre hopper whilst the larger Espro models are fitted with a 3,500 litre hopper. The time and fuel saving will be significant for operators looking to incorporate fertiliser, seed and potentially a cover crop or pesticide such as slug pellets.

    The 3 metre model can be fitted with two hoppers from the KUHN range, the SH1120 sits on the drawbar and SH1540 is fixed on the rear. The 4000 R can be coupled to the SH1120 which mounts to the drawbar, with the larger SH2560 being mounted on the rear of the machine. The smaller SH1120 is well suited to slug pellets, whilst the larger could be used for a second seed type. Similarly, the larger 6 metre model, the 6000 R, can be specified with the same SH1120 hopper, but can also carry a larger SH4080 on the rear.

    The additional hoppers also offer a way to reduce soil compaction by minimising the need for heavy machinery to be used for multiple passes. Whether direct drilling or drilling into cultivated land, the Espro can sow seed, fertiliser, and slug pellets in one pass. The additional hopper space could also be used to increase seed capacity, using the additional hoppers to sow two types of seed and fertiliser, should slug pellets not be needed.

    The depth at which the seeds and products are drilled can also be adapted, enabling two different depths to be set. This enables the Espro to drill three products at two depths across a variety of soil types.

    By using all three hoppers, operators can make significant fuel savings. The Espro is also well suited to medium to large-scale arable farmers and contractors thanks to the low power requirement and high output capacity.

    There are four SH hoppers with capacities ranging from 110 litres to 400 litres. The application rate for the smallest in the range is 0.6kg/ha up to 65kg/ha whilst the largest offers an application rate of 2.2kg/ha up to 130kg/ha. The mid-range models offer 150 and 250 litres respectively and also provide an application rate of 2.2kg/ha up to 130kg/ha.

    All SH hoppers feature a 12 V motorised Helica metering unit that uses fluted cells to provide constant and regular seed flow. The seeding rate can be adjusted without removing or changing any parts to speed up the process. The constant distribution and uniform seed positioning prevents competition between plants by providing sufficient surface area for plant development.

    The Crossflex coulter bar is the key to the Espro range’s high working speeds. Each coulter is mounted on polyurethane blocks which allow the individual coulters to closely follow terrain contours. This ensures a consistent seeding depth across the machine’s full working width and enables accurate seeding to be carried out at high forward speeds. 

    The Espro uses two rows of cultivating discs followed by a single row of large diameter (900mm) press wheels which are offset and fitted with specially designed deep tread tyres to create an ideal seedbed. Other options on the front are a levelling board, track eradicators, full width press wheels or press wheels and track eradicators in combination.

  • The evolution of tillage techniques on heavy arable land in the East Midlands

    Written by Dr Alastair Leake from The Allerton Project

    “There’s a reason why we use the plough” a colleague sagely advised me when I questioned this fundamental agricultural practice; “It works” – and I was treated to a history lesson to-boot. Having transitioned from growing heated glasshouse salad crops in hydroponics, the ultimate zero-till system, I was curious to explore the concept of Integrated Crop Management (ICM), which appeared to advocate as one of its key tenets something called “Min-till”.  

    Over the next decade we transitioned through a number of drills, mostly loaned by dealers. We began with a one pass system developed by German machinery manufacturer Rau, which completes four operations in one pass – soil loosening legs to open the ground; a powered rotovator to create the tilth; a seeder unit dropping the seed into the curtain of soil thrown up by the rotovator; and roller to consolidate. We had good results with establishment but the machine was only 3.0m and needed a lot of horse-power and the intensive soil disturbance by the rotovator chitted a lot of weed seeds. On 2,000 acre estate we calculated that we’d need 8 of them to get the autumn crops in so that machine idea was parked.

    Next up was the formidable JD750A No-till drill. Being rather too eager on its first trip out we drilled for 7 minutes and then spent 7 hours unblocking the drill. But once the operator was tamed the results were impressive. The drill was excellent on seed depth placement, seed to soil contact and was able to deal with undulating ground and trash remarkably well. Its only downsides were a hefty price tag and the wide rows which allowed weeds too much space to grow before the crop canopy closed. 

    Following a visit to Sweden, where the crop establishment interval between harvest and permafrost can be tight, we bought in a Vaderstad Rapid drill. Again it took us a while to set the drill, including a visit from the Companies UK MD who spent several hours under the drill making adjustments, (impressive I thought, how many MD’s would be able to do that?) and then we were flying as the machine gobbled up the acres. We were not alone, the ground-breaking LIFE (Less Intensive Farming and the Environment) Project, which was pioneering minimal tillage approaches at the time also moved away from a one pass Dutzi drill to a wider, faster operating disc drill. Indeed,  more and more people were asking to come and visit our trials and it was clear that there was a renewed appetite to move away from the plough, after a discredited spell of direct drilling during the 1970’s.

    At this point I moved 12 miles to take up my role at the Allerton Project. Allerton too was in the process of transition moving from ploughing to a Simba Solo and Free-Flow drill system. This was a good “belt and braces” approach on heavy ground, but the level of disturbance is akin to a shallow plough, but without the inversion. We expanded our operations by taking on contract work for neighbours who were not yet ready to invest in machinery and make the switch until they had seen some results. Some considered the tine based Free-Flow to be a weak link in the system so we brought in a Vaderstad Rapid with disc seeders, which we operated successfully for a number of years. From then we moved onto a John Dale Ecodrill interspersed with a Claydon. I’m often asked by farmers to nominate the best drill I have ever used, but that’s impossible to say, because every drill has its strengths, depending on what you are using it for and where and when you are using it.

    Recognising that issues of trash, slugs, grassweeds and compaction can be a challenge for non-inversion tillage systems a small group of experts set up a new organisation – The UK Soil Management Initiative or UKSMI. SMI brought together soil scientists, farmers, machinery manufacturers, NGO’s and agronomists to work together to overcome the problems. We were soon in-touch with European partners and similar National Associations from Denmark, Germany, Portugal, Italy, Spain and Switzerland coalesced to create The European Conservation Agriculture Federation or ECAF. We succeeded in gaining EU Funding under the LIFE Programme and this enable us to travel and meet, run seminars and farm walks and all learn from one another. I consider this bringing together of knowledge to have been key to the rapid adoption of non-inversion tillage across Europe. In the UK we went from less than 10% of land under non-plough tillage in 1999 to over 50% by 2006, just 7 years, putting us only second to Finland on the leader-board. The number of country members of ECAF doubled too as others joined.  Defra commissioned us to write “A Guide to Managing Crop Establishment” and to run events and workshops around the country. The Guide used 12 case studies on different soil types, rotations, in different counties to show how some farmers had managed to successfully make the switch away from ploughing. Another study, again supported by Defra. compared 5 farms using non-inversion tillage with 2 farms still ploughing. The results showed that non-inversion tillage saved 52 minutes a hectare in establishment time. With farms expanding at that time but not wishing to increase labour this was a major driver behind the switch.

    Engineering developments meant drills achieved better slot closure, straw choppers and spreaders got better at dealing with straw and “trash rakes” were developed, including one by SMI founder Director and Worcestershire Farmer Jim Bullock who went onto form BASE (Biodiversity, Agriculture, Soil and the Environment) with another pioneer of the time Steve Townsend. With better trash management and slot closure slugs became less of a problem.

    Important new research at the time demonstrated significantly less seed hollowing when winter wheat was sown at 40mm rather than 20mm, partly through preventing slugs from accessing the seed and partly due to more consistent and higher moisture levels at depth giving rise to faster chitting and lessening the vulnerable period when seed is sat in the soil dormant. Further research demonstrated that trashy stubbles were good for beneficial predatory insects which helped to reduce BYDV infections by controlling winged aphids flying into the crop. Only quite recently we have shown how direct drilled stubbles with long straw provide structures for spiders to weave webs and reduce cabbage stem flea beetle infestations in autumn sown oilseed rape, and across a wide range of sites we have shown time and again that birds prefer stubbles in winter compared to ploughing.

    So with the majority of the early problems of switching tillage resolved we were left with the final and most difficult challenge – herbicide tolerant blackgrass. In a short article I’m not going to be able to begin to cover the vast amount of work that has gone into trying to manage this. Indeed having listened to renowned Rothamsted weed scientist Steve Moss speak on the subject for over four hours, and to be re-assured by him that he could go on for another two, you can see why I might shy away from this. However certainly our experience at the Allerton Project, where the battle continues, we have found that using a whole range of approaches in tandem can make the problem manageable. Shifting to a strong emphasis on cultural control is working for us, including bringing in spring sown crops to the rotation, delayed drilling in the autumn, the re-introduction of rotational leys, which we spray off after three years and then direct drill with hybrid winter barley, which effectively gives us four years without fresh return of blackgrass seed works well. Perhaps the most contentious thing we do is to occasionally introduce the plough to invert the soil and give us a fresh start. This I know causes deep anxiety to those who believe that all the hard work done to make the transition to direct drilling will be lost. Perhaps then I can offer some words of comfort based on our scientific evaluation of the impacts of rotational ploughing. Firstly, if you only do it once then the harm is limited. Certainly we lost around 20% of the carbon and 50% of the earthworms, but we still had more of both than when we started down this route. Consolidating the soil quickly behind the plough reduces soil carbon loss, and possibly earthworms too. Done well it can certainly reduce the amount of blackgrass seed in the germination zone, but you may also get some unexpected surprises as I did when we ploughed a field that had only been cultivated by reduced tillage for 2 decades; we brought up dormant charlock seeds. It showed me how well we had purged the field of this weed problem through non-inversion tillage without even noticing, until we brought up that legacy to the top again. 

    Going forward it is good to look back at what we have learnt and how we have addressed the past challenges. Now we must address the current ones. Recent work at Allerton with Syngenta has  shown that Conservation Agricultural approaches halve the amount of fuel used while increasing the work rate by 50%. With high fuel costs and weather patterns becoming more extreme, limiting work windows and curtailing yields, the challenge now is to make our approach to crop establishment more resilient.                                   

  • How to make foliar nutrient applications more consistent

    Written by Mike Abram

    When prices of nitrogen rocketed ahead of last season, and supply looked anything but assured for a time, there was an understandable interest and move towards alternative sources of nitrogen fertiliser.

    One of those was foliar nitrogen with plenty of growers either trialling or increasing its use.

    Foliar feeding, particularly of trace nutrients, is, of course, nothing new. It offers an alternative, potentially more efficient and much quicker route to get nutrients into the plant. But results can also be inconsistent and variable.

    Much of that is potentially down to factors around application, suggests Joel Williams from Integrated Soils. He has recently launched a four-week, 10-lecture online masterclass into foliar feeding, especially foliar nitrogen.

    “The goal is to avoid the spray and pray approach,” he says. “It’s not just about filling up the tank, throwing in some nutrients and going – there are a lot of things to consider.

    “Foliar nutrient sprays have the perception of being rather inconsistent, and I think that’s because attention to detail on the design of the application and the spray conditions is not there.”

    To help overcome that, Mr Williams has developed the FACE framework. FACE stands for formulation, application, crop and environment – the key aspects to consider when applying foliar nutrients. For each he has some recommendations for optimum performance, with formulation and environment particularly crucial.

    “Try to follow these recommendations as best you can to optimise applications and minimise variability,” he suggests.

    Formulation

    Before you even consider adding nutrients to the tank, think about water quality, Mr Williams says. “It is very clear that water quality can have big impacts on pesticide efficacy, and the same is true of nutrient uptake.

    “For optimised foliar nutrient sprays use as clean water as possible – rainwater is ideal.”

    An alternative is using a process called reverse osmosis to de-mineralise or de-ionise water by pushing it under pressure through a semi-permeable reverse osmosis membrane. This removes salts and other contaminants that could lock up the nutrients.

    While kits are expensive, some Australian and Canadian farmers have found it easily pays for itself within a couple of years just on savings on herbicides, Mr Williams says.

    Optimal pH of the spray solution should be between 5 and 5.5, and certainly no more than six, he adds. “Optimal absorption of nutrients happens under acidic conditions.”

    Water hardness is a well-known issue with some pesticides, and high amounts of highly charged ions such as calcium and magnesium can lock up nutrients. A review of literature suggests if water hardness is reaching 250ppm of calcium carbonate or equivalent it’s worth looking trying to clean that water up, if possible, with reverse osmosis or diluting with a cleaner source, he suggests.

    The same applies with bicarbonate, with Mr Williams suggesting a maximum of 500 ppm, and also salt, with a guide figure of less than 50 milliSiemens/cm for salinity.

    Activator adjuvants that either alter the behaviour, activity or availability of the nutrient compounds, or utility adjuvants that change the water properties can also be helpful.

    Examples of activator adjuvants include stickers helping stick the spray solution to the leaf, spreaders that maximise the surface area of contact for absorption, penetrants, such as fulvic acid or amino acids, which help improve uptake, and humectants which slow the drying of the droplet.

    There are two main water conditioners – ammonium sulphate and citric acid. “Both are good,” Mr Williams says. “You don’t need huge amounts depending on water quality. The acid or sulphate binds to the cations to prevent them from binding to the compound of interest.”

    Application

    As with any foliar spray, application will be crucial to maximising effectiveness. With foliar nutrient sprays, choose the appropriate combination of nozzles, pressure and forward speed to achieve an appropriate droplet size for it to reach the canopy, and stay on the leaf.

    Water volume is important – high enough to maximise coverage, but not too much that the spray solution runs off the leaf.

    The other key is to try and coat both sides of the leaf – a little bit of wind to rustle the crop can be helpful in achieving this – as nutrient uptake (see panel) is through stomata, which are mostly on the underside of the leaf, as well as targeting the upper surface of the leaf for  uptake through the cuticle and leaf hairs.

    Crop

    As well as obvious different canopy structures between crops, there are other crop-specific characteristics that can impact on performance.

    Obviously, there has to be enough leaf area to spray, Mr Williams points out, which means letting crops recover enough from grazing to capture the spray. “That might be a week to 10 days after grazing, although in New Zealand some growers are going after just four days and still seeing effectiveness.”

    If the plant is stressed from drought, temperature or pest or disease attack, uptake will be reduced, he adds.

    Younger leaves tend to be more responsive to foliar-applied nutrients, with quicker uptake than older leaves, which are a bit more waxed. “The same is true of different plant types – brassica leaves tend to be more waxy than cereals and harder for nutrients to penetrate. For these I would emphasise using stickers and penetrant adjuvants to get the nutrients through that waxy layer.”

    There are varietal differences. “Some varieties do better under low or high input type systems, or different growing conditions and the same is true of foliars, with some more responsive than others.

    “That’s something we could perhaps be breeding for. If we bred more specifically for this we could get higher nitrogen use efficiency and lower nitrogen requirements for crops.”

    Environment

    If there is one factor to pay particularly close attention to when spraying foliar nutrients it is relative humidity. “You want relative humidity to be high to keep the cuticle layer dynamic and permeable and the stomata open.”

    The magic number for relative humidity is 70% and above for optimising stomatal opening, he says. Research consistently shows greater uptake at higher relative humidity.

    High temperatures should be avoided with an absolute maximum of 28C, but preferably no more than 25C advised.

    “Your optimum spray window is likely to be either early morning or later afternoon when relative humidity tends to be highest. High light intensity can also increase uptake.”

    On the leaf you want the droplet to slowly dry out, but not too rapidly. Water slowly evaporating from nutrient droplets has a positive in making the nutrient more concentrated and therefore creating a gradient to make absorption into the leaf easier, but if it happens too quickly the solution can crystallise leading to poor uptake.

    There are two factors in play here – the combination of relative humidity and temperature drives evaporation rate, while the point of deliquescence of the nutrient salt drives how quickly the salt starts to crystallise.

    The point of deliquescence (POD) is the relative humidity at which a hygroscopic material, like a fertiliser granule, can take enough water out of the air to dissolve into a solution, or looking at the other way, when it will start to crystallise.

    That relative humidity point changes for different nutrient salts (see table). Some are relatively low like calcium chloride and magnesium chloride (around 33%), while others are very high like potassium sulphate (98%). When relative humidity is above that point the salt solution stays in solution and there should be good uptake, while below it, crystals start to form with poorer uptake.

    Mixing different salts, however, tends to bring down the mixture’s POD, usually by more than you would expect just from averaging the constituents, Mr Williams says. “Practically though it could be worth adding a kilo of a low POD material to bring the POD of the whole mixture down.”

    Evaporation rate is defined by a metric called Delta T – effectively a combination of relative humidity and temperature. High Delta T means faster water evaporation. It typically has more relevance in hotter climates, Mr Williams says, but might be a useful indicator in hotter summers in the UK.

    “You’re looking to spray when Delta T is between two and eight (see chart). When you’re in that band you have good humidity [for stomatal opening] and slow drying of the droplet and will help maximise uptake.”

    Where Delta T is getting or is too high, you can mitigate its effects by increasing water rates and using coarser nozzles, while at lower Delta T values, do the opposite and use lower water volumes and finer nozzles. Stickers can help keep the droplets on the leaf for longer, he says.

    Practical application advice for foliar nutrient applications

    • Use as clean water as possible – rainwater
    • Water pH 5-5.5, with low hardness or bicarbonate
    • Add chelators and / or carbon source to neutralise nutrient charge and increase uptake through a negatively charged leaf surface
    • Cover both sides of the leaf to maximise stomatal and cuticular uptake
    • Aim to spray when humidity is above 70%
    • Check Delta T is 2-8 especially in hot weather when spraying
    • Avoid spraying when crop is stressed

    How are nutrients taken up by leaves?

    While roots are designed to uptake nutrients and are the dominant pathway, it is possible for nutrients to be taken up through the leaves.

    There are six potential pathways for uptake through the leaves, but three are thought to be key – through the cuticle, or leaf skin, through the stomata – the pores that control the rate of gas exchange and are critical for photosynthesis, and through tiny leaf hairs called trichomes.

    Researchers traditionally believed that nutrient uptake was through micropores in the cuticle, which open under high humidity, Mr Williams explains. “The same is also true of stomata.”

    In both cases the uptake is passive, relying on a gradient moving the nutrient from high concentration outside the leaf to a low concentration inside the leaf.

    Environmental conditions that encourage these micropores or stomata to open and close are therefore important to uptake, with humidity, temperature, light, plant water status and carbon dioxide all factors.

    But it might not be just these pores that are important, Mr Williams says. A recent review by Victoria Fernandez from the University of Madrid suggests that in higher humidity or when the leaf is wet, water channels are created from outside the leaf through the cuticle. “Therefore nutrients can move via this water bridge through the cuticle into the plant,” he explains.

    Uptake might also be through the leaf hairs, at least in some plants, he adds. “For example, a study in sunflowers has shown that at the base of these hairs there are cells that are very permeable and receptive to taking up nutrients. Nutrient droplets will be caught by these hairs and run down to the base, where those cells can absorb them.”

  • Soil Health: New Opportunities to Innovate in Crop Protection Research and Development

    Atwood et al, 2022

    The paper discusses the importance of soil health in crop protection research and development. The authors argue that soil health should be given greater attention in crop protection research as healthy soils can lead to healthier crops and better yields.

    It highlights the challenges faced by farmers in maintaining soil health, such as soil erosion, loss of organic matter, and soil compaction. These challenges can lead to reduced soil fertility, nutrient deficiency, and reduced crop yields. The authors suggest that addressing these challenges requires an integrated approach that combines soil management practices, such as conservation tillage and crop rotation, with crop protection strategies.

    It also discusses the potential of new technologies to improve soil health and crop protection. For example, precision agriculture technologies can help farmers optimize their use of fertilisers and pesticides, reducing the risk of overuse and environmental harm. Similarly, genetic engineering and biotechnology can help develop crops that are more resistant to pests and diseases, reducing the need for chemical pesticides.

    The authors argue that innovation in crop protection research and development must prioritize sustainable practices that promote soil health and biodiversity. They suggest that a more holistic approach to crop protection that incorporates soil health can help improve the sustainability of agriculture and reduce the environmental impact of farming.

    In conclusion, the article emphasizes the importance of soil health in crop protection research and development. The authors argue that by prioritizing sustainable practices that promote soil health and biodiversity, farmers can improve crop yields, reduce the use of chemical pesticides, and contribute to a more sustainable future for agriculture. They call for greater collaboration and investment in research and development to develop innovative solutions that address the challenges facing soil health and crop protection. It is an interesting read and worth 20 minutes of your time.

    Paper Abstract

    Soil health-based agricultural management practices are widely promoted to reduce erosion, increase nutrient use efficiency, improve soil structure, and sustain or increase yields. Pest and disease management are less frequently considered as components of a soil health management system. We present a framework for how the crop protection industry can advance soil health by developing systems of crop protection innovation that simultaneously target soil health outcomes, either through direct impact on soil or by enabling practices that promote soil health outcomes. Such an approach could lead to cross-sectoral, integrated agricultural solutions that achieve agronomic, environmental, and economic goals.

    Read the full paper by following this link: https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.821742

  • Farmer Focus – David White

    April 2023

    As this magazine is entitled Direct Driller I’ll start off with a couple of drill comments.

    The CO4 has had a set of replacement Dutch 2” tips fitted as the first set had worn very thin in places and changing the odd failed one resulted in uneven depth across the drill.  I’d deliberated over fitting another style of point but decided that I like the light disturbance that a 2” gives when drilling cover crops behind the combine covering beans for instance promoting better germination of volunteers. A little width of spread in the seed row also appears to close the 250mm row gap although whether this is a measurable advantage I don’t know.  There are times when I think a very narrow point such as the Metcalf would benefit me with its minimal disturbance, but I have an Avatar too so both options are covered.  Having had the Avatar a couple of seasons now its operation and setup has become more intuitive.  A couple of things I don’t like are that I still get an odd blocked coulter and I cant work out why which is annoying, shame blockage sensors are sooo expensive!  I don’t like the cluttered run screen layout which seems to repeat unnecessary information and restrict things I do want to see clearly and quickly. And finally, and only because I want to use rates for things outside the norm, I find I haven’t always got an appropriate seed rotor.  A low rate of companion beans is an example that would never have been an issue with the lovable ubiquitous Accord rotor.  Perhaps the clever people at Horsch could design one?

    Having followed my first successful Bi-Cropping (if that’s what we’re calling it?) experiment with spring Boats this year’s winter version of Mascani with Tundra beans was similarly successful.  Again, these were grown with no post emergence inputs other than some Man-Mag nutrition and had a very favourable GM compared with the control of mono-crop Mascani. I see a big future for both bi-crops and companions grown with cereals in making our rotation and production more regenerative and its even being supported now with greening SFI ££s.  My inclusion of winter pea, vetch and beans came very well in the wheat crop last year and survived the pre-em herbicide without issue.  I didn’t get chance to repeat that this year due to time restrictions, but I see it standard practice going forward.  This aided by having multiple seed hoppers on the Avatar.

    The one thing holding back wider adoption of “Bi” and “Com” cropping is the ability to clean and separate the harvest output on farm.  It’s disappointing that the latest round of grant funding is not helping to move this initiative on and whilst again there is the opportunity to have a new direct drill subsidised (again!) on farm seed cleaning machines don’t feature.  I’m now involved in starting a local cluster group and one of the things we are exploring is grant funding of a group mobile cleaner.  As part of this I’m in conversation with the terrific guys at McArthur Agriculture about building a higher spec mobile cleaner, more versatile than the one you may have seen at LAMMA.  This should be able to produce two clean grain fractions as well as course and fine waste.  Being able to fine clean at around 8t/h or so will remove the hesitation some of us have at broad acre bi-cropping our farms.

    Sadly Glyphosate has been adopted as the whipping boy of the anti-pesticide greens throughout Europe.  Rarely do we attend a meeting where the “how are you going to direct drill without glyphosate” question isn’t asked.  The honest answer is I don’t know yet.  If we do lose it I know it will potentially be a huge detrimental step in my ability to build the natural capital in my conservation farm environment whilst maintaining profitability tipping my grain down the same hole and being paid the same as the global commodity priced “normal” stuff, huh!

    So I’ve gone a little bit Wild, to be precise Wildfarmed.  I hadn’t got a trial this year which worried me, I have now.  I’ve planted 6ha of their spring milling wheat blend and am planning two more 6ha areas to form a new rotation.  Small scale you may say but enough to learn on.

    The main reasons for going Wild.

    1. The growing standards stipulate no “cides” which includes glyphosate so I’ll have to learn how to grow without it. 
    2. Companions and bi-cropping is encouraged, yey! and the crop can be delivered entire, unsorted.
    3. I’ll be supplying a supply chain that recognises value and pays a premium, and be able to buy the bread in the shops.
    4. Other than the seed the spend will be negligible so no spray bills, double yey! However, we can use a limited amount of synthetic nitrogen if sap tests demonstrate the need.

    Confession time.  More or less for the first time in seven years I’ve done a little bit of cultivating, non-yey.  Nothing like full inversion or very deep.  Even though the combination of a demo Horsch Cultro crimper and -10º frost did kill the cover crop there were some remaining grass weeds that I wanted to kill. *Thought bubble, Whist many of us in East Anglia were getting worried by the February drought I’ve rediscovered a dry period is fabulous/essential for drying out freshly disced up blackgrass plants.  A pass with the light disc machine in the frost followed by a well timed pass with the tine drill putting in the companion beans left a clean seedbed for the disc drilled wheat.  Whether all this disturbance will stimulate a bigger spring flush of broad-leaved weeds I don’t know but the true DD control strip I left should show.

    Without being able to dip into the spray shed for a herbicide, forward planning for the Wild rotation will be important so consideration is already being made for managing the year two and three areas.  Herbicide residues may already have made establishing a clover living mulch difficult.  Should under-sowing something else in the spring barley on one of the areas which is still herbicide free be considered? Which frost intolerant cover crop species need to be considered for next year?  Will I need sheep? double non-yey!  All questions that can be answered by those more experienced than me on the very active Wild WhatsApp group.

    *I wanted to; did I need to? In a diverse regenerative rotation using less synthetic nitrogen will a few grass weeds prove to be the problem they are when fuelled by 240kgs of N?

  • Claydon: Drill Manufacturer Update

    Written by Jeff Claydon

    April 2023 Issue

    Spring is the ideal time to check your soils and consider how to improve them, says Jeff Claydon, Suffolk arable farmer and inventor of the Claydon Opti-Till® direct strip seeding system.

    Spring is an excellent time to focus on soil health and how to improve it, because regardless of where you are, excellence in this aspect of farming is essential to maximise crop production and financial performance. I will provide some pointers later in this article, but first let us discuss the impact of the weather over the last year.

    On the Claydon farm we had just 632.4mm of rain between 1 January and 31 December 2022, in line with our long-term annual average of 629mm, surprisingly. More significantly, from the start of the year until harvest finished during the first week of August just 244mm fell, and September remained very dry. The situation changed after we finished drilling winter wheat on 11 October, with two thirds of our annual rainfall coming in the last quarter of the year.

    The first few weeks of 2023 have also been quite unusual, with just 58mm of rain from 1 January until 15 February. Our 200ha of winter wheat, all LG Skyscraper, has come through the winter in excellent condition and although we have yet to apply any liquid nitrogen the crop has never looked ‘hungry’, retaining a lovely deep green colour throughout. When temperatures increase the first dose of nitrogen will go on and hopefully it will progress rapidly from there.

    The Opti-Till® system has been used to establish crops on the Claydon family’s arable farm since 2002. The difficult-to-manage Hanslope series soils have constantly improved and provide ideal conditions for growing high-yielding, profitable crops. A 6m version of the new Claydon Evolution drill is seen here establishing winter wheat in October and in mid-February the crop was in great shape. Although designed as a direct drill, the scenario where maximum benefit is realised, the Claydon drill’s versatility allows it to be used in conventional and min-till establishment situations after soil consolidation.

    ——————————————————————————————————————————————————

    Our winter oilseed rape did what it always does and died back considerably over the winter. Of the 61ha drilled about 5ha was severely affected by cabbage stem flea beetle and slugs. Exceptionally dry weather last summer forced slugs to go down deep into the soil to avoid dehydration but when the weather turned wet they surfaced to feast on the emerging crop. We applied slug pellets immediately after the first rain, but it was too late; the damage had already been done.

    Some areas of oilseed rape looked patchy in February, but once warmer weather arrives and nitrogen is taken up it will make up ground.

    Oilseed rape has a strong, deep taproot.

    In mid-January we applied Kerb® herbicide to take out grass weeds in our oilseed rape, except on the small area which will be redrilled with spring oats. To date, there are no signs of it working and the forecast is for more frosty mornings over the next ten days, so it will be a while before the results are seen.

    Ten days ago, we applied 200l/ha of Chafer Nuram 35 + S (35%N + 7SO3) and the seven days of frosty weather which followed hit the crop hard. Even though all our oilseed rape is the hybrid variety DK Excited the low temperatures have restricted its growth and I expect the crop to continue looking lacklustre. Oilseed rape has a good strong, deep taproot so once warmer weather arrives it should power away.

    At the time of writing conditions are very dry and fields destined for spring sowing would be in an ideal condition for drilling but for one thing – the continuing low temperatures. In days of old, gauging when soils were warm enough to start drilling was done using what was technically termed the ‘grandpa’s bum’ test, i.e., if the soil was warm enough to sit on with a bare bum it was warm enough to drill. I’m pleased to say that things have moved on considerably since then with our weather station now providing very comprehensive and accurate readings from the comfort of the office, eliminating the need to compromise personal integrity or cause distress to passers-by.

    The dry, sunny, but very cold conditions are very misleading. Last week the daytime temperature was down to minus 2°C, yet today’s high is 13°C with an overnight low of 3°C, so even though spring oats favour early drilling it’s perhaps too cold to sow the 77ha of Elsoms Lion that we have planned. The variety yielded a pleasing 6.11t/ha last season and this year’s crop will be sown from home-saved seed.

    Overcoming the temptation to rush out with our new 6m Claydon Evolution drill requires great restraint. However perhaps we should try some drilling to see how the oats perform; they are tough characters, and if it were to turn dry like last season it could be a real winner. Or if we get an attack from the Beast from the East, we might be pleased that we were patient.  Who knows? We sprayed off any grass weeds and volunteers in mid-November so that they didn’t get too big and we will apply another dose of glyphosate before drilling, then follow behind the drill with our Claydon Straw Harrow before rolling.

    SOIL HEALTH IS A PRIORITY

    Soil health should be the number one priority on any farm. Even in mid-February, all the land on the Claydon farm is travelling wonderfully well and so supportive that we are considering switching from 620 x 42 tyres to 420 x 50s on our self-propelled 36m RoGator® sprayer to keep tramlines narrow and minimise potential damage to the crop as it develops.

    The extremes of weather over the last two or three years have highlighted the importance of having resilient, well-structured soils supported by an effective drainage system to take water away. However, achieving this using conventional crop establishment methods can be challenging.

    In mid-February the soil in this field, which will go into spring oats, was in excellent condition and would have been ideal for drilling had air and soil temperatures been higher.

    ——————————————————————————————————————————————————

    Conventional full cultivations and min-till systems can overwork the soil and destroy its structure, adversely impacting worm populations and activity. This reduces the soil’s ability to drain water in wet weather, leading to collapsing, slumping, and baking out, which increases moisture loss in dry conditions. This also starves the crop’s roots of essential air and nutrients, ultimately reducing yield potential and increasing the cost-per-tonne of production. The risks from flooding and soil erosion are also substantially higher.

    Ploughing is expensive, both financially and environmentally. It creates the need for extra cultivation passes and increases fuel consumption. Turning the soil over releases moisture and CO2 to the atmosphere. Ploughing can deplete organic matter, mineralise nitrogen and harm soil life, while increasing the risk of wind and water erosion. The soil’s natural structure is destroyed, and it can no longer support the weight of heavy machinery, resulting in compaction and deeper wheelings, requiring more cultivations to repair the damage.

    A min-till approach involving several shallower cultivations can also damage the soil’s natural structure and biology, which can lead to compaction and waterlogging. Min-till mixes weed seeds throughout the soil profile which allows them to germinate over a longer period. Drying the soil and preserving the weed seed bank is not helping to diminish the problem. Min-till can also dehydrate the soil which, combined with soil that breaks down easily into fine particles, can wash down the capillaries made by worms, blocking the flow of water through the profile into the drainage system. Green algae on the soil surface are an obvious sign of poor drainage and reflect anaerobic conditions, as do patchy crops on headlands.

    Poor drainage on this headland is evident from visible wheelings.

    Green algae on the surface indicate poor drainage.

    Patchy crops on headlands are a further indicator of areas where drainage needs to be improved.

    ——————————————————————————————————————————————————

    ADOPTING A DIFFERENT APPROACH

    Instead of continuing the cycle of cultivations to resolve poor drainage/ soil structure it makes sense to find an alternative. The Claydon Opti-Till® System which we have used since 2002 has been transformational, eliminating the need for unnecessary, expensive cultivations while also reducing the cost and time involved in establishing crops. As we demonstrate the poor drainage effects on small areas, even with the Claydon system, it makes great sense to resolve them. With the reduction in cultivation costs/time using the system it has allowed us to direct these savings into drainage improvements. This has resulted in better yields, cleaner, more reliable crops, increased soil health, less erosion, better performance and ultimately reliable profitability. Our soil is made up of 55% silt 25%clay 20%sand, so this clay loam is not the easiest to farm, resulting in mainly cropping related to the combine harvester and the development of the Opti-Till® system.

    The Claydon drill’s leading tine technology is at the heart of the Opti-Till® system. The leading tine loosens soil, but only where necessary, namely in the rooting and seeding zone, while the bands between the seeded rows are left undisturbed. The front tine loosens and aerates the soil, creating a friable tilth which provides a perfect environment for seedlings to germinate and develop strong, deep roots that tap into the moisture in the undisturbed banks of soil. The leading tine also breaks up any shallow compaction, reinstating the water and air balance in the soil, providing good drainage so that excess can get away from the rooting zone. This eliminates ponding through the later autumn and winter period.

    Moisture is retained in the unmoved soil for the crop to access, while earthworm populations thrive as their burrows and old rooting pathways remain intact. The natural structure of the soil is also left undisturbed and as the capillaries remain unbroken water infiltration and rooting are unimpeded, which minimises stress on the crop throughout its life cycle, while soil biology flourishes. Claydon soils also have an increased capacity to support traffic in the field without risk of compaction.

    A GOOD TIME TO TEST

    Spring is an excellent time to evaluate the condition of your soils, check for signs of compaction and ensure that drainage systems are working correctly. This is easy and cheap to do, requiring nothing more than a fork, penetrometer, water infiltration tray and a couple of glass jars. With the information they provide you can plan to correct any deficiencies.

    ——————————————————————————————————————————————————

    Jeff Claydon takes a penetrometer reading in a field destined for spring oats.

    ——————————————————————————————————————————————————

    The first step is to insert a penetrometer into the ground at various points across the field to check that there are no soil pans, as these will severely limit drainage and root development. They are not caused solely by compaction from heavy machinery or working when conditions are unfavourable but can result from the sedimentation of soils that have been over-cultivated and ‘settled out’ over the winter. If they are present, the probe becomes much more difficult to push into the ground and the indicator needle swings into the red.

    Unhealthy soils run together, or ‘slake’, very quickly when wetted because they lack the natural glues which help bind them together. Slaking blocks the natural pores and worm burrows in soil, which can lead to waterlogging and can develop into erosion, resulting in a loss of topsoil.  Conversely, in very dry conditions wind erosion can occur and be equally damaging.

    The slake test assesses the stability of soil aggregates when exposed to rapid wetting, as in the case of heavy or prolonged rainfall. The longer it takes for the soil sample to break up the better as this indicates a high degree of organic matter which helps to bind it together. This simple yet important test provides an excellent indication of a soil’s resilience and health, is easy to do and costs nothing. The ‘Soil’ page of the Claydon website (claydondrill.com/soil/) has a short video showing the test being carried out.  

    ——————————————————————————————————————————————————

    The jar on the right contains a sample of soil from the Claydon farm. It held together firmly even over a prolonged period.  So little soil fell through the wire mesh at the top of the jar that the water remained clear right to the bottom. The silt soil in the other jar quickly fell apart and most of it dropped to the bottom, clouding the water.

    ——————————————————————————————————————————————————

    There, you will also find our soil health brochure, which includes contributions from leading industry experts on a range of topics. Dr Elizabeth Stockdale, Head of Farming Systems Research at NIAB, discusses the benefits of good soil structure, how it can be damaged and how to improve it. Jerome Vasseur from seed breeder Jouffray-Drillaud in France highlights the benefits of cover crops and how to get the best out of them, while Gordon Brookes from Michelin discusses how to choose the correct tyre to reduce soil compaction.

    FINAL THOUGHTS

    Soil is an extraordinarily complex web of interactions, but in the right condition, with the right structure and nutrition it will deliver the results you are looking for. The key is to appreciate that its natural biology is there waiting to help; you just need to create the conditions to allow it to kick in.

    All land is unique and often one field can contain several different types of soil which set the inherent limits to its physical properties, while management modifies those properties. Soil structure is broken, not made, by machinery: the plant roots, earthworms and glues/gums created by the decomposition process are the keys to its structure and aggregating ability. Food diversity is essential for both human and soil health, so adding more food to the land will allow it to support more biodiversity. Therefore, only move soil when necessary, avoid leaving ground bare and ensure that crops are grown in optimum conditions so they can maximise photosynthesis.

    Working effectively with the soil requires an integrated, flexible approach to its husbandry. Changing one aspect of a system can alter the entire outcome and so, for example, the same drill might work differently in different situations and soils. When changing to strip seeding you cannot simply buy a new drill and expect that everything will be fine from the outset: for optimum results you must adapt your system and tailor your husbandry accordingly.

    Even with the soil in excellent condition we are at the mercy of the weather. What will happen over the next few months we cannot tell, but if last year taught us anything it should be to always expect the unexpected. I will discuss the progress of our crops further in the next issue of Direct Driller and highlight some of the benefits which others who use the Claydon Opti-Till® system are experiencing.

    The Claydon website galleries contain numerous videos on soil health and resilience, as well as showing the Claydon Opti-Till® System being used to establish all types of crops, in all situations, both in the UK and overseas – claydondrill.com. You can also keep up with the latest posts, photographs, and videos from Claydon and its customers through the Claydon Facebook page www.facebook.com/Claydondrill

  • Drivers in Regenerative Agriculture

    Written by Robert Patten B.Eng. MBA from Plantworks and Smart Rotations

    We can define regenerative agriculture in many ways, indeed many have, but for the sake of a grounded definition let us agree it begins with a focus on the soil being an asset and not a commodity. This is a good start, as assets you value and try to build greater value in and commodities you tend to absorb.

    Knowledge is a function of time, and much time has passed since we first started to cultivate the soil. We have bent technology to our will in many aspects of agriculture and have achieved huge advances in field yields, pesticides efficacy and farming scale. It is though only relatively recently that technology has been able to peer into the workings of the soil, to look at the underlying chemistry and biology and understand how these have become altered by contemporary farming practices.

    In an all too simplified summary we find that soil organic matter, a proxy of soil health, has declined in some cases to critical levels, this valuable resource of carbon is needed to support the native biology of soils. This biology in turn has a direct correlation to yield, where through the many microbial interactions with plants communities of fungi and bacteria explore soils for nutrients, release them and convert them into plant available forms. As we move away from the quest for ever greater yields through intensive farming and focus on sustainable practices that, by definition, can be maintained for generations we will rely on ever greater understanding of the many complexities of soils.

    Farming is often highlighted asa contributor to greenhouse gasses, there is no getting away from it, with the USDA reporting that US agriculture is responsible for 10% of their carbon dioxide equivalent emissions. Fundamentally though, unlike any of the other sectors that at best can seek to reduce their emissions through adoption of new technologies or modulation of activity, only farming has the ability to reverse its carbon footprint and to potentially act as a global carbon sink. Think on that for a moment, there are potentially 570 million regenerative farming machines that could not only reduce their emissions but actually help to ‘call down’ the CO2 that the industrial revolution and the decades that have proceeded have ejected into our atmosphere.

    Little surprise then that governments have rightly sought to support forms of regenerative farming around the world from both a future food security stand point and an environmental one. These interventions come in different forms, in the UK they are presented as incentives under the new Environmental Land Management Schemes (ELMS) that aim to support sustainable farming practices, improving animal health and welfare, reducing carbon emissions, creating and preserving habitat, and making landscape-scale environmental changes.  Other governments, for example in Hungary, are taking a more generalised approach with farmers able to claim an 80 euro contribution per hectare when using bio stimulants and broader rotations combined, or a microbial bio stimulant alone, to accelerate their sustainable management of soils.

    As we deal with the business at hand of farming we probably do not often spare a thought to the workings of the board rooms of big corporations, but it turns out they are taking an ever greater interest in us. Environmental, social, and corporate governance (ESG) is a framework designed to be embedded into an organisation’s strategy that considers the needs and ways in which to generate value for all organisational stakeholders (such as employees, customers, suppliers and financiers). It is noteworthy that many of these corporations hold investment either directly, or through their supply chain, into regenerative agriculture in very high regard, as it supports their audit of their environmental impact. PepsiCo, as an example, have stated that they corporately aim to change to regenerative practices on their not inconsequential 3 million hectares by 2030. It is interesting to note that all the big accountancy firms now run significant teams to audit ESG, a market that did not exist five years ago.

    One of the consequences of the global traction of regenerative farming is the associated industries that have sprung up with technologies and service offerings targeted at this sector. One of the fastest growing agricultural sectors is the supply of biologicals, embracing bio stimulants, microbial bio stimulants (bio fertilisers), biorationals and associated products. The sector is forecast to eclipse $25 billion in 2028 and not surprising has caused a level of refocusing through acquisitions of the      traditional manufacturing supply chain. We only have to reach back six months in history to note the Corteva Inc acquisition of biologicals firm Stoller Group Inc for $1.2 billion in cash – Nov 2022, Valent BioSciences LLC, part of the Sumitomo Group, acquisition of FBSciences Holdings, Inc.     -Jan 2023 and Syngenta Seedcare collaboration with Bioceres Crop Solutions to bring innovative biological seed treatments to market a few months before. Indeed in February this year Bayer and Spanish group Kimitec announced a strategic agreement aimed at accelerating the development and commercialisation of biologicals solutions for crop protection and biostimulation. This will in turn see a technology push effect as marketing and sales endeavours seek to achieve a suitable return on these investments in the sector.

    More domestically it is also noteworthy that all of the major UK agronomy companies now offer ‘soils’ related programmes with novel products and services. With relatively low differentiation in  this sector in relation to traditional agronomic advice and lowering margins on product supply, regenerative agriculture offers scope for completely new insights into land management over a potentially long transitioning period with the possibility of developing new product offerings with higher margins. I am minded to note that many of these groups have in themselves sought to pioneer regenerative practices based on their own research activities and with an eye on future trends and government polices.

    The carrot of carbon credits is an opportunity for regenerative farmers, using a suitable audit system they have a tangible proposition to quantify the incremental carbon that they lock up into the soil. As processes evolve to more easily codify the carbon retained and infrastructure to trade the credits becomes more developed and competitive this will act as an additional financial incentive for change which seems very appropriate based on the value being added here.

    And finally, we come to the farmer who has to navigate all these forces for change, in an environment of increasing input costs and environment considerations. Thankfully the early regenerative farming movement has now grown to be a cultural movement, with knowledge sharing, adoption of new farming rotations and products. Significantly there has been a shift here in the supply and demand of knowledge as farmers have taken the lead in up ‘skilling’ themselves in terms of understanding of soils and how their core asset is best managed. In turn they are becoming more selective of the advice they seek, inputs they use consequently the supply chain has, and will, adapt to the changing demands of their clients.

    There is a confluence of change factors in the market, a near perfect storm of new knowledge, good intension, government intervention and industrial funded products and services that have acted to accelerate the regenerative farming moment into what needs to become the ‘standard farming model’.

    About the author:

    Robert Patten B.Eng. MBA – Robert is the managing director of PlantWorks and Smart Rotations and has been leading change in the microbial sector in the UK for over twenty years.

    References:

    https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/03/regenerative-agriculture-revolutionize-farming-climate-cahnge/

    https://ourworldindata.org/farm-size
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Environmental,_social,_and_corporate_governance
    https://www.pepsico.com/our-stories/press-release/pepsico-announces-2030-goal-to-scale-regenerative-farming-practices-across-7-mil04202021
    https://www.fortunebusinessinsights.com/industry-reports/agricultural-biologicals-market-100411