Back Issues

If you would like a printed copy of any of our back issues, then they can be purchased on Farm Marketplace. You can also download the PDFs or read online from links below.

  • How To Start Drilling For £8K

    Clive Bailye’s seed drill of choice is his 6m John Deere 750A , which has been used exclusively for 3-4 seasons. Last year, with an increased acreage, the founder and publisher of this Direct Driller magazine thought a second seed drill was necessary. Having just the one machine was a risk and in a difficult season would mean drilling was delayed. He looked around and found a good condition Horsch CO6 tine drill advertised in Germany.

    Words and pictures by Mike Donovan

    upload_2018-4-7_16-39-39.png

    After delivery he rebuilt the coulters to a narrow profile so as to reduce soil disturbance. He says the tine drill is very useful driling after straw crops such as osr and also through the straw on second crop cereals.

    Buying the drill from a German farmer was not particularly complicated, and provided him with a higher spec machine than Horsh sell in the UK. The seed dart tyres are much wider, and the machine is fitted with blockage monitors as well as full width front packers and also a liquid fert application system.

    A sheaf of photos were taken, and Clive then asked for some of specific parts to show wear. The deal was done at under £5,000 which Clive says is the market value of these machines which are too large for small farmers to buy. Original owners like to buy new and sell when the machine is still in good condition.

    Narrow tines with wear tiles

    @Clive knew he wanted to make changes, substituting the Horsch tines and coulters for something far narrower, and has ended up getting his own design of tine made, which has a wear tile made from Ferobide, far harder than tungsten. The drill is on the farm primarily for osr and 2nd crop cereals drilled into chopped straw and the 25cm spacing is okay for these crops.

    Comments on Clive’s on-line forum, TFF, said the drill many not be so good with beans, as the slot is a mere 12mm wide. And in barley the spacing may well be too wide as it needs to be thick. Clive points out that the seed pipe can actually be a bit wider than 12mm as it is in the shadow of the point. It would be good to have the option of using it for beans.

    upload_2018-4-7_16-42-6.png

    Above left: The cheap CO6 is being calibrated ready for its first outing

    upload_2018-4-7_16-42-44.png

    Above right: The adapted Horsch is being filled by the home built drill logistics trailer with seed and liquid starter fert.

    Getting around the German instructions

    The Horsch came, of course, with a control box and instructions in German. More on-line discussion revealed that English instructions were available on the Horsch website, and another explained that Horsch was sourcing some of these parts from Agton in Canada anyway. Zealman from New Zealand explained that the button marked with callipers should be held down for around 5 seconds. The menu is where you adjust the tramline sequence, valve layout and row numbers.

    upload_2018-4-7_16-44-45.png

    Ball hitch is a continental standard and provides a positive connection between tractor and drill

    upload_2018-4-7_16-45-16.png

    The Stocks Wizard has a rotor modified for Avadex which otherwise leaks everywhere

    A Stocks Wizard is on the back of the drill and used for Avadex. Here again the knowledge of actual farmers is helpful. Alistair Nelson warned that the rotor and the surrounding shroud need to be changed, and he got good advice “from Rick at Stocks”. Clive has the same setup on the 750A and says that the Avadex leaks everywhere unless the modification is made. The drill was acquired and modified in 2016 and the results have been excellent.

    The machine went through the residue without many problems and having the second drill has meant more timely planting. Clive has shown that moving into No-Till is not the expensive exercise so many farmers think it might be. The total cost, after modifications which included replacing all tines and coulters, was under £8,000.

    Author Mike Donovan writes: we have featured a number of home made direct drills in @Practical Farm Ideas, and are always interested in seeing more. Please contact mike editor@farmideas.co.uk or 07778877514.

  • Excellent results from the 2022 harvest, but what next?

    DIRECT DRILLER MAGAZINE – AUTUMN 2022

    Excellent results from the 2022 harvest, but what next?

    With the harvest safely gathered in Jeff Claydon, Suffolk arable farmer and inventor of the Opti-Till® direct strip seeding system, discusses the results and looks ahead to next season.

    ———————————————————————————————————————————

    18 August 2022           

    It has been a very strange year for weather in most parts of the UK. Here in Suffolk, where annual rainfall is just 600mm making it one of the driest regions, the exceptional conditions brought back memories of 1976. That year, almost no rain fell between March and September and during a visit to the county then Minister of Agriculture, the late Fred Peart, described the drought as a tragedy, urging the public not to panic. Sounds familiar!

    Between New Year’s day and the end of May this year our farm weather station recorded 196.8mm of rain, well below the long-term average. April brought only 18.6mm and in May 41.6mm fell, followed by 34.4mm in June and a miniscule 10.4mm in July, contributing to a total of just 244mm for the year to date. Much of that came in the form of short, localised showers, so the water evaporated very quickly and produced little benefit.

    One positive of the exceptionally dry conditions was our earliest-ever harvest. The 12m Claas Lexion 600 Terra-Trac had an uninterrupted run from the time we cut the first oilseed rape in mid-July until the last spring oats which were combined during the first week of August.

    With daytime temperatures consistently in the mid-to-high 30s and little in the way of overnight dew we were able keep going for as long as we were physical able to do so. It was a very tiring couple of weeks, but with help from my sons, Oliver and Spencer, harvest was completed in record time and with wheat coming into store at 11-12% there were no drying costs.

    Harvesting wheat on the Claydon Farm with the 12m Claas Lexion 600 Terra-Trac.

    TOO DRY TO DRILL

    The downside of the prolonged dry weather is that currently the land is too dry to drill oilseed rape. Normally, the crop would have been in the ground a week or two ago but, with no moisture to start the germination process, drilling it then would have been a mistake. Patience is the key as we await some meaningful rain!

    The ground is so dry and cracked that undertaking any form of conventional cultivations would be very expensive in fuel, excess wear on machinery and ground-engaging metal. Breaking down the large clods created by that approach would also be very time-consuming and expensive but driving around the area those drawbacks have not stopped some from trying.

    On our own heavy clay land, the Claydon Straw Harrow has been successfully deployed across the whole farm, the main limitation being keeping dust to a minimum by restricting forward speed when operating close to houses in the village, especially if they have washing on the line!

    With our rotation having changed from wheat and oilseed rape to include more spring-sown and break crops, the aim is to use land destined for spring drilling to help reduce the weed burden and seed bank using Opti-Till® stubble management techniques which move no more than 2cm of topsoil. This enables us to control weed seeds and volunteers without herbicides, other than one full-rate application of glyphosate just prior to drilling.

    The new 9m mounted version of the Claydon Straw Harrow is seen here working in ‘80-acre’, a field which has been managed using the Claydon Opti-Till® System for 20 years, after the previous crop of LG Skyscraper winter wheat had been harvested. Following 2.4mm of rain overnight the lack of dust was noticeable, even at 25km/h!

    Effective stubble management has become particularly important following the loss of neonicotinoid seed treatments and some products to control grassweeds due to the inherent fear that the aphid vectors of Barley Yellow Dwarf Virus (BYDV) will increase significantly. However, BYVD can be reduced considerably by using the Opti-Till® system to manage stubbles and eliminate the ‘green bridge’ effect. It also enables drilling to be delayed, but to do that with any degree of certainty you must be able to get the crop in the ground quickly, which means not having too many operations before sowing.

    Last night’s 2.4mm of rain was just enough to make conditions perfect for the Claydon Straw Harrow, a simple, robust, fast, and very effective stubble management tool with many uses. Operating at 15 – 25km/h, it is equipped with sprung steel tines which vibrate rapidly to break up straw and expose chopped crop residues. They also create a ‘boiling’ action which uproots weeds and volunteers, as well as destroying slugs and slug eggs. An additional upside of the hot, dry conditions has been that slugs have had a very tough time and have been unable to breed, so we will not have to worry about them this season.

    The Straw Harrow creates a fine micro-tilth in the top 20-30mm of soil, providing ideal conditions for rapid germination of weeds and volunteers, which can then be raked out and destroyed with another pass before they become established. When glyphosate is eventually applied, it is as a single, full-strength dose prior to drilling, which maximises its effectiveness and reduces the risk of weed resistance

    Conditions were perfect for the Claydon Straw Harrow to create a micro-tilth which will encourage rapid germination of weeds and volunteers. These can then be raked out and destroyed with another pass before they become established.

    Even during a prolonged dry spell and high summer temperatures the difference between harrowed and unharrowed soil is clear. Unharrowed soil is hard and baked with shrinkage cracks; soil that has been harrowed has a crumbly, fine tilth and crop residues have been broken into small pieces.

    20-YEAR ANNIVERSARY

    This harvest marked 20 years of establishing all crops on the farm using only Claydon Opti-Till® products. These consist of the Straw Harrow, occasionally the TerraStar® light rotary cultivator where slightly more soil movement is required, together with the Claydon direct strip seeding drill, followed by the TerraBlade inter-row hoe.

    My last article for Direct Driller mentioned that our crops were showing exciting potential, and they certainly lived up to expectations. That was a pleasant surprise given the lack of rain and the fact that we backed off on the nitrogen due to concerns that it would not be fully utilised in the dry conditions. This was a good decision, made easier because we only grow feed wheats. Winter wheats received 190kgN/ha, 50 – 60kgN/ha less than our normal 240-250kgN/ha, and oilseed rape a similar amount, again less than normal.

    In a couple of small areas where nitrogen was missed when applying it through our 36m self-propelled sprayer, for which I can only blame myself, the yield plummeted, highlighting the importance of this major nutrient. Without fertiliser and agchems yields would quickly regress to 1970s levels, around 30cwt for barley and 2 tons per acre in ‘old money’ terms, or 3.7t/ha and 5t/ha respective in modern parlance.

    The key difference between the 1970s and now is that there are more mouths to feed. According to the Office of National Statistics the UK population was 56,226,000 in 1975, it rose to 65,110,000 in 2015 and is projected to hit 69,444,000 by 2025. Should we therefore be concerned about the dramatic curbs on nitrogen use currently being proposed by the governments of The Netherlands and Canada?

    Fungicide programmes were maintained at normal levels because these products more than cover their cost through increased yield. Past experience has shown that if yellow rust or other foliar diseases take hold significant yield potential has already been lost by the time the signs become visible, far outweighing the cost of an effective treatment programme..

    GOOD DRAINAGE INCREASES YIELDS

    Drainage is very important to get the best from our heavy clay soils and in a couple of areas where the old tile system had broken down a significant reduction in yield was apparent. One 12ha area produced 7.78t/ha, compared with over 9.5t/ha in the adjacent field, an overall loss across that small area of around 25 tonnes, so correcting the problem was a priority.

    Dry weather allowed local drainage contractor W. R. Suckling & Sons to install new plastic pipes 1m deep across a total of 40ha in various fields. Some was done in the spring, some through rape stubble, and we will mole drain across these areas when conditions allow. Land is far too valuable to have it underperform, and this investment should maximise its potential by increasing yields.

    The dry spring and summer, combined with the use of a Claydon TerraBlade inter-row hoe meant that our crops were the cleanest I have ever known, with no spring-germinated blackgrass. I am delighted with the results of the 2022 harvest, high yields underlining the benefits of establishing deep rooting structures which enabled crops to make best use of available moisture. Having recently invested in a new weighbridge we know that the yield information is precise and have posted it on the Claydon website (claydondrill.com).

    Oilseed rape stubbles were Straw Harrowed in July to create the ideal conditions for weeds and volunteers to germinate once rain arrived.

    Those of you who have visited the Claydon factory will know the 16ha field to the right of the access road. The winter wheat there yielded just over 10t/ha, while the average across our whole IACA registered area was 9.54t/ha, with higher-than-average hectolitre weights. Given the lack of rain and 25% reduction in nitrogen use those are both excellent figures.

    Hybrid oilseed rape provided a similarly pleasing result. DK Excited, which was drilled at just 2.7kg/ha using a pre-production version of our new Claydon Evolution drill, averaged 3.84t/ha, with one field producing 4.2t/ha. Given that the crop had to contend with very dry weather, some pigeon damage, and small areas where cabbage stem flea beetle had attacked, these yields are exceptional. With very low establishment costs, a low level of fungicide use, and just 190kgN/ha the margin will be very attractive.

    Spring oats put in a surprising performance and are destined for use in a range of gluten-free products such as breakfast cereals and oat milk. We drilled the new Elsoms variety Lion directly into stubble which had been Straw Harrowed using a seed rate of just 100kg/ha and the crop subsequently received a total of 100kgN/ha in two equal splits.

    A Claydon TerraBlade inter-row hoe took out any grassweeds growing between the band-sown rows before they had a chance to develop and compete with the spring oats, so the crop looked clean throughout. Given the season’s challenges I was very pleased that it averaged 6.11t/ha, which was slightly below the 7t/ha from last year’s crop of WPB Elyann (KWS) but that had much more favourable growing conditions. We will be drilling Lion again in 2023, as 25% of the farm will be into spring oats, 25% oilseed rape and 50% winter wheat, all first wheats.

    Current conditions are the polar opposite of those last year, when there was plenty of moisture in the ground during August, but September was quite dry. With the ground currently bone dry we are waiting for significant rainfall to provide some moisture, so everything is currently in a state of limbo. The soil temperature is much higher than at the same time last year, so I am not too concerned that oilseed rape has not been drilled; it is much better to wait and sow into moisture than have the seed sit there doing nothing.

    Our own land is showing none of the deep cracking which is evident on some nearby farms where conventional cultivations and establishment protocols are used, nor do we have deep tramlines which will take time and money to put right. In contrast, our, fields are level with a layer of fine tilth and crop residues on the surface which will protect and insulate the soil, providing perfect conditions for drilling when we do get some rain.

    With Claydon customers saving up to £250/ha on establishment costs by using the Opti-Till® System demand for our products from farmers throughout the world is at record levels, so I am delighted that our new 36m x 36m clear-span building is almost finished. We have managed the build project in-house but, due to difficulties in getting contractors, progress has been slower than anticipated. The concern now is finding enough additional staff to fill the numerous vacancies that we have to offer so if you know of anyone who might be interested in a role please ask them to contact us! When complete the new facility will double our production capacity.

    Just before harvest, accredited master thatcher Harry Roberts of Harry Roberts Thatching Servicesfinished replacing the roof at Gaines Hall, our Grade II listed 16th Century farmhouse. After 44 years’ service it was rethatched using wheat straw grown by Harry using the heritage wheat variety Maris Widgeon, drilled using a Claydon drill. We are delighted with the results.

    Part of the new Claydon clear-span building which will provide additional manufacturing capacity to meet global demand for the company’s range of Opti-Till® products.

    The new 9m mounted version of the Claydon Straw Harrow is seen here working in ‘80-acre’, a field which has been managed using the Claydon Opti-Till® System for 20 years, after the previous crop of LG Skyscraper winter wheat had been harvested. Following 2.4mm of rain overnight the lack of dust was noticeable, even at 25km/h!

    Conditions were perfect for the Claydon Straw Harrow to create a micro-tilth which will encourage rapid germination of weeds and volunteers. These can then be raked out and destroyed with another pass before they become established.

    Oilseed rape stubbles were Straw Harrowed in July to create the ideal conditions for weeds and volunteers to germinate once rain arrived.

    Land on the Claydon farm shows none of the deep cracking evident on some nearby farms where conventional cultivations are used, as can be seen in the photograph below. The layer of chopped straw and crop residue on the surface after the Straw Harrow has been used protects the soil and locks in moisture, encouraging weeds and volunteers to germinate. The soil is perfectly prepared, creating a stale seedbed ready for drilling the next crop.

    Part of the new Claydon clear-span building which will provide additional manufacturing capacity to meet global demand for the company’s range of Opti-Till® products.

    An aerial view of Gaines Hall, Jeff Claydon’s Grade II listed 16th Century farmhouse in Suffolk, which was recently rethatched using wheat straw from a crop that was band sown with a Claydon drill. This approach results in the wheat stems being much thicker, more resilient and of higher quality than from crops drilled at the conventional row spacing. The crop was cut with a binder, stood in stooks for two weeks, then threshed in the traditional way to produce the best quality straw for thatching.

  • Robert Plumb Discusses Biological Farming

    BIOLOGICAL Farming, with the help of natural soil bacteria and Fungi, is growing rapidly and in the current crazy
    climate there is more and more interest – after all, we can now use these little bugs to provide Nitrogen, Phosphate
    and now Potassium. There are also products that will stimulate root growth and help to reduce disease pressure.
    Written by Robert Plumb

    I have been working on the Biological side of farming for 20+ years; before that, I was a fertiliser blender in mainstream agriculture, so over the years I have seen a few changes, not least the demise of companies like ICI, Fisons, Albright &Wilson and lots of others. In those early days when fertilisers were made more commonly available, many fertiliser companies took soil samples and simply recommended their products. It was very confusing for farmers as the soil results given used a range of different laboratories many using different extraction methods, this meant the farmer could not easily compare results.

    In the early 70’s the ADAS (then based at Cambridge), asked for a meeting with these fertiliser companies that included ICI, Fisons (now Norsk Hydro) and about15 other companies plus advisors; they then worked on an extraction method for a common soil analysis.

    Now bear in mind these people were there to sell fertiliser. The idea of replacing what you take off came later and sounds very good but is it really necessary? Little notice was made for the use of manure, and compost was unheard of. At that time fertilisers were quite cheap and a rule of thumb was a tonne of Nitrogen was about the same price as a tonne of Wheat, ie about £20.In fact, most compounds were at a similar price and Phosphate even qualified for a subsidy, as did all lime materials. It was a pretty simple system and it certainly sold a lot of fertiliser. But was it really necessary? Many of our long term friends have not applied any P or K fertilisers – other than a bit of compost, for a very long time (20 years plus) and their soil levels are pretty much the same as when we started, and yields have been OK. They are not trying to grow maximum yields but do they actually make a profit?

    Levels of K go from low to high

    Potassium (K) is extremely important for crop health and yield and at Soil Fertility Services we like to monitor the plant response with regular plant samples. We found that last season’s K levels – in all crops, were extremely low. No surprise from a dry soil. With plants unable to pull it off the clay particles and exchange sites, we are now being told that straw K levels were high! Potassium is important as it helps a plant to regulate water uptake and the opening and closing of the stomata; it is also critical in producing proteins and most wheat protein levels have been low. 

    Plants actually need similar amounts of Potassium as they do Nitrogen. This could be up to 200kg. I have never seen one with that level of Potassium at the main stem extension period, but now we may be able to help. We have developed a K fixing product. Similar to the N Fixing product Bio-N, the beneficial K fixing micro-organisms will release around 50kg of K from your soil’s “locked” up reserves, directly into the rhizosphere where your plant system can easily take it up. It may take two applications of 10 litres to provide all your crop’s needs, but it will surely help to overcome the problem of Potassium shortages.

    We have been measuring ‘total Soil K reserves’ and find between 6,000 and10,000 kg/ha in the top 10cm (4”) of your soil. Most of this K is in the lattice of the clay particles and is considered ‘unavailable’, but we can easily find200 – 300 kg on the surface of the clay fraction that can be made available to your crop with the help of the Bio-K.

  • Robert Plumb Discusses Biological Farming

    BIOLOGICAL Farming, with the help of natural soil bacteria and Fungi, is growing rapidly and in the current crazy climate there is more and more interest – after all, we can now use these little bugs to provide Nitrogen, Phosphate and now Potassium. There are also products that will stimulate root growth and help to reduce disease pressure.

    I have been working on the Biological side of farming for 20+ years; before that, I was a fertiliser blender in mainstream agriculture, so over the years I have seen a few changes, not least the Demise of companies like ICI, Fisons, Albright & Wilson and lots of others.

    In those early days when fertilisers were made more commonly available, many fertiliser companies took soil samples and simply recommended their products. It was very confusing for farmers as the soil results given used a range of different laboratories many using different extraction methods. This meant the farmer could not easily compare results.

    In the early 70’s the ADAS (then based at Cambridge), asked for a meeting with these fertiliser companies that included ICI, Fisons (now Norsk Hydro) and about 15 other companies plus advisors; they then worked on an extraction method for a common soil analysis.

    Now bear in mind these people were there to sell fertiliser. The idea of replacing what you take off came later and sounds very good but is it really necessary? Little notice was made for the use of manure, and compost was unheard of. At that time fertilisers were quite cheap and a rule of thumb was a tonne of Nitrogen was about the same price as a tonne of Wheat, ie about £20. In fact, most compounds were at a similar price and Phosphate even qualified for a subsidy, as did all lime materials.

    It was a pretty simple system and it certainly sold a lot of fertiliser. But was it really necessary? Many of our long-term friends have not applied any P or K fertilisers – other than a bit of compost, for a very long time (20 years plus) and their soil levels are pretty much the same as when we started, and yields have been OK. They are not trying to grow maximum yields but do they actually make a profit?

    Potassium (K) is extremely important for crop health and yield and at Soil Fertility Services we like to monitor the plant response with regular plant samples. We found that last season’s K levels – in all crops, were extremely low. No surprise from a dry soil. With plants unable to pull it off the clay particles and exchange sites, we are now being told that straw K levels were high! Potassium is important as it helps a plant to regulate water uptake and the opening and closing of the stomata; it is also critical in producing proteins and most wheat protein levels have been low.

    Plants actually need similar amounts of Potassium as they do Nitrogen. This could be up to 200kg. I have never seen one with that level of Potassium at the main stem extension period, but now we may be able to help.

    We have developed a K fixing product. Similar to the N Fixing product Bio-N, the beneficial K fixing micro-organisms will release around 50kg of K from your soil’s “locked” up reserves, directly into the rhizosphere where your plant system can easily take it up.

    It may take two applications of 10 litres to provide all your crop’s needs, but it will surely help to overcome the problem of Potassium shortages.W e have been measuring ‘total Soil K reserves’ and find between 6,000 and 10,000 kg/ha in the top 10cm (4”) of your soil. Most of this K is in the lattice of the clay particles and is considered ‘unavailable’, but we can easily find 200 – 300 kg on the surface of the clay fraction that can be made available to your crop with the help of the Bio-K.

  • Groundswell 2022

    Farmers and growers flocked to the sixth annual Groundswell, the UK’s largest regenerative agricultural show in late
    June this year. It was another sell-out event with 5,500 attendees who travelled to North Hertfordshire for two days of
    information exchange, inspiration and a bit of liquid refreshment during the worst drought since 1976.

    Written by Alex Cherry

    With over 140 sessions to attend, Groundswell offered a platform for household names, technical experts, experienced regenerative farmers and leading researchers to explore and debate the issues, opportunities, science and practices around regenerative agriculture. The event has grown from 500 farmers in a barn in 2016 as the “No-Till Show” to the two-day “Regenerative Agriculture Show and Conference” that it is today. Although, one commentator referred to it as a “Festival of Ideas” which perhaps seems more appropriate given the scale and breadth of content.

    The eve before Groundswell is always exciting as people begin to arrive from all corners of the UK and beyond, pitching tents and getting the lay of the land. It is a chance to catch up with old friends and make new acquaintances in The Earthworm Arms Bar, where there were some enticing foodie offerings including different Pasture for Life meats cooked over fire. Dr Doolittle took to the decks and blasted out some disco classics which had mixed reviews from the audience, although a loyal cohort in Hawaiian shirts kept the energy going. The camping area soon filled up with around 750 campers with all shapes and sizes of tents and campervans.

    On Wednesday morning Jill Clapperton kicked off proceedings in the Big Top tent, followed by Greg Judy advising farmers “How to think like a Grazier”. Across the8 different session venues it was tough deciding what to go and see. Before the midday session a tribute was made to Caroline Drummond MBE, recognising her incredible achievements of 30 years leading LEAF, before her tragic passing in May.

    Henry Dimbleby provided a one year update to the National Food Strategy and Dwayne Beck from South Dakota asked “Are We Doing The “Right Things” Or Only Doing The Wrong Things Better? ”Billy Lewis was announced as “Mixed Soil Farmer of the Year” and David Miller as the “Arable Soil Farmer of the Year” in the awards organised by Farm Carbon Toolkit. Tom Martin ran a very honest session entitled “Learn from My Mistakes”, a forum which was appreciated by the audience.

    The guest speaker that seemed to be on everyone’s tongue was George Monbiot who presented a well rehearsed synopsis of his latest book “Regenesis”. The audience were broadly welcoming of this polarising debate on the future of food. It posed some difficult and highly-referenced points to disrupt the assumption that Regenerative Agriculture is the answer to feeding the planet. As a festival of ideas, it is important to challenge everything. It was noble of George to attend Groundswell, although it would have been even even more impressive had he stayed on for a couple of drinks in the Earthworm Arms to listen to some of the pioneering regenerative livestock farmers he rallies so strongly against..

    Professor Lennart Olsson from Lund University in Sweden provided a fascinating update on the progress of the radical “perennial revolution” that the Land Institute and their global network are working on.

    After a stimulating and hot day, unsurprisingly the Earthworm Arms bar became the focal point for further in-depth analysis and discussion. The beer was brewed in part by surplus bread from Toast Ale and brewing enthusiasts headed to the tour at Crossover Blendery where the beer is spontaneously fermented and flavoured by the fruit growing in the agroforestry on the farm. 

    As the sun set, attendees got stuck in to some serious shape throwing on the dancefloor to the groove of funk and soul from DJ Krinks and, in the campsite, history was made as the first Groundswell marriage proposal took place and a happy couple announced their engagement, fittingly on the anniversary of their first embrace at Groundswell 2021. We look forward to the first Groundswell wedding in 2023!

    Despite a few sore heads and one speaker declaring memory loss from the antics in the early hours, Thursday’s sessions kicked off with stimulating questions proposed: “How is big business adopting regenerative agriculture? ”And “Does it make financial sense to go Regen? ”.In the Demo Field the line up of manufacturers showcasing their direct drill machines included Weaving, Sky, Dale, Sam Agri, Horsch, Novag, Kverneland, Ryetec, Tuckwells, Amazon, Primewest, Claydon and Horizon. The ground was very dry and the cover crop was bulky with rye volunteers and weeds. As a case study of an innovation born from a meeting at Groundswell, Small Robot Company and Tuckwell’s demonstrated their Treatment Maps Partnership- Tom robot can identify individual weeds in the field and also provide accurate plant counts in a growing crop, whilst also giving an accurate assessment of leaf colour and biomass assessment. This is converted into shape files readable by the sprayer which targets problem areas rather than applying a blanket application to the field.

    Defra Secretary of State George Eustice was joined on stage by: Minette Batters, tenant farmer and NFU President; Baroness Natalie Bennett, former leader of the Green Party; Tony Juniper, Chair of Natural England; in a panel chaired by Baroness Rosie Boycott, journalist and publisher. Commenting on the show, Eustice said “It’s amazing to see such creative thinking, new ideas being pioneered, new agronomic techniques and indeed, the rediscovery of old ones.”

    Elsewhere in the programme speakers tackled practical issues such as ‘do potatoes have a place in regen systems?’, ’Improved Nutrient Management with Zero Carbon Fertilisers” and ‘the threat of weeds for regenerative agriculture. ’Hosts John and Paul Cherry led a group to move the mobof beef shorthorns for the last session of the day with Greg Judy providing a refreshing and entertaining commentary on proceedings.

    We hope the show is re-energising and stimulates new ideas in this fast changing world we live in. If you missed some of the sessions in person, you can watch nearly all of them on the Groundswell YouTube channel. If you have an idea for a great session for next year applications are accepted via the Groundswell website. We’re busy planning already, looking to expand on the offering for small-scale regenerative farmers, new entrants and market gardeners, while not forgetting the retail sector. We are also asking exhibitors to state what they are doing to support Regenerative Practices when they apply for a stand. We hope the show can continue to bring together a forward thinking community whilst regenerative agriculture becomes more widespread within the UK farming industry. Make sure you have the dates in your diary – 28th and 29thJune 2023.

  • Fix Our Food – Transforming Food Systems In Yorkshire

    This year the University of Leeds has launched a project researching regenerative farming systems in Yorkshire. This
    project is part of the FixOurFood programme led by the University of York, funded by UK Research and Innovation,
    a government fund to support research to investigate ways to transform the UK food system. As the challenge to
    address the food system nationally is so large, the FixOurFood project is focusing on Yorkshire as a pilot region to
    explore regenerative approaches that could be scaled to the UK and beyond. The project focuses on three areas of
    innovation 1. sustainable and healthy food for children, 2. hybrid business models and 3. regenerative farming systems.

    Researchers from the University of Leeds Prof Lisa Collins, Prof Steve Banwart, Prof Pippa Chapman, Dr Gesa Reiss and Dr Ruth Wade, are leading the regenerative farming systems research in Yorkshire. Yorkshire has a large variety of farming systems, containing 13 – 17% of the UK’s crop production area and 10 – 14% of the UK’s livestock headcount, with a large diversity of soil and land cover in the region and an established network of innovative farmers. This makes Yorkshire a ideal place to investigate and understand the complex dynamics of farming systems. Together with key networks and alliances, the team at the University of Leeds are exploring existing examples of regenerative farming in the region, identifying the limiting environmental, social and economic factors, and discovering practical steps needed to support shifts towards regenerative farming. The research group will then determine what the regional potential is for implementation, and if regenerative agriculture could contribute to combat global warming if scaled up nationally.

    Earlier this year, they released a survey to ask farmers what the University can do to support regenerative farming. Four key areas were identified which will be the focus of the project going forwards. From this survey they also sought to understand the opinions, opportunities, current activities and challenges associated with regenerative agriculture. To date, they have received 166responses, 147 (89%) said they were farmers and 79% from England. Responses came mostly from those already practicing elements of regenerative agriculture, with the majority of participants stating the main aim of regenerative agriculture was to ‘improve soil quality and fertility’ and the main motivation to move towards regenerative practices was to ‘improve soil health’. Most participants were using cover crops and direct drilling, and were most interested in reducing agrochemical inputs and increasing diversity in arable rotations. They felt the biggest challenge of moving towards regenerative agriculture was the ‘lack of information on good practice’, ‘lack of evidence’ and concerns over ‘reductions in yield’.

    To support evidence-based practice, the University of Leeds is using its 317ha research farm to trial and test regenerative farming practices. The University of Leeds farm has been developed as a digitally connected smart-farm and terrestrial observatory. The main activity is a field-scale, replicated experiment using a historically conventionally managed field and measure the impacts of different transitions to regenerative agricultural practices on the soil, crop, greenhouse gas emissions and profit. This trial is in collaboration with NIAB whose Northern Regional Centre is based at the University of Leeds farm. The trial has been designed with advice from researchers and farmers from Yorkshire with seven treatments that range from a ploughed-based conventional farming system, through to significant changes in rotation and the inclusion of grazing livestock.

    The experiment began last month but prior to any cultivations, Dr Ruth Wade led a team of researchers to collect baseline measurements of the soils current physical, chemical and biological status. The farm is on fine loamy soils(Aberford Series) and the team collected soil samples at 10cmintervals down to a depth of 50cm. These soil samples are currently being analysed in the lab for measurements such assoil structure, aggregate sizes, water holding capacity, carbon and nitrogen content. Throughout the trial, researchers from the project team will be measuring the impacts of the different transition approaches on soil health, crop growth, agronomy, greenhouse gas emissions, and economics. Soil sensors and automated greenhouse gas measurement chambers will be installed in the experimental plots to collect real-time high frequency measurements. In addition to collecting data, the trial will be used as a regional demonstration platform for farmers to view and discuss different management practices, and the learnings and outcomes will be fed back to the larger FixOurFood programme policy and governance team at City University.

    We know from experience that soils must ‘earn’ the right to be direct drilled, which in practice means resolving any existing soil health issues before switching to a direct drill system. The soil assessments carried out by the researchers indicated that the historic intensive cultivations and high field traffic have caused soil structural issues that needed to be addressed. Therefore, the treatments transitioning to regenerative agriculture have received a non-inversion, shallow cultivation in the first year to alleviate the soil structural issues, whilst beginning the transition to regenerative management. Drilling will be carried out using a Ryetec MAAG SSP Direct Drill as it is a flexible machine allowing us to drill effectively across the range of cultivation treatments with one drill.

    Pig manure was supplied by the University of Leeds National Pig Centre (based at the University of Leeds farm) and was spread on those plots receiving FYM using the Morley Agricultural Foundation small plot manure spreader that allowed the farmyard manure to be applied at a specific rate and only to those plots that required it. Companion crops and herbal ley seeds were broadcasted and rolled, and the establishment of winter wheat single varieties and winter wheat blends will happen in the autumn.

    We will continue to monitor and report on the project, if you would like to know more information or sign up to the
    newsletter please contact us through the FixOurFood website https://fixourfood.org/

    There are many farmers in Yorkshire exploring different management practices and we hope that this project is the start of a significant effort to support farmers in the region.

    Dr Ruth Wade, University of Leeds
    Dr Joseph Martlew, NIAB

  • Groundswell 2022 Catchup

    Farmers and growers flocked to the sixth annual Groundswell, the UK’s largest regenerative agricultural show in late
    June this year. It was another sell-out event with 5,500 attendees who travelled to North Hertfordshire for two days of
    information exchange, inspiration and a bit of liquid refreshment during the worst drought since 1976.

    Written by Alex Cherry

    With over 140 sessions to attend, Groundswell offered a platform for household names, technical experts, experienced regenerative farmers and leading researchers to explore and debate the issues, opportunities, science and practices around regenerative agriculture. The event has grown from 500 farmers in a barn in 2016 as the “No-Till Show” to the two-day “Regenerative Agriculture Show and Conference” that it is today. 

    Although, one commentator referred to it as a “Festival of Ideas” which perhaps seems more appropriate given the scale and breadth of content. The eve before Groundswell is always exciting as people begin to arrive from all corners of the UK and beyond, pitching tents and getting the lay of the land. It is a chance to catch up with old friends and make new acquaintances in The Earthworm Arms Bar, where there were some enticing foodie offerings including different Pasture for Life meats cooked over fire. Dr Doolittle took to the decks and blasted out some disco classics which had mixed reviews from the audience, although a loyal cohort in Hawaiian shirts kept the energy going. 

    The camping area soon filled up with around 750 campers with all shapes and sizes of tents and campervans. On Wednesday morning Jill Clapperton kicked off proceedings in the Big Top tent, followed by Greg Judy advising farmers “How to think like a Grazier”. Across the 8 different session venues it was tough deciding what to go and see. Before the midday session a tribute was made to Caroline Drummond MBE, recognising her incredible achievements of 30 years leading LEAF, before her tragic passing in May. 

    Henry Dimbleby provided a one year update to the National Food Strategy and Dwayne Beck from South Dakota asked “Are We Doing The “Right Things” Or Only Doing The Wrong Things Better?” Billy Lewis was announced as “Mixed Soil Farmer of the Year” and David Miller as the “Arable Soil Farmer of the Year” in the awards organised by Farm Carbon Toolkit. Tom Martin ran a very honest session entitled “Learn from My Mistakes”, a forum which was appreciated by the audience. The guest speaker that seemed to be on everyone’s tongue was George Monbiot who presented a well rehearsed synopsis of his latest book “Regenesis”. 

    The audience were broadly welcoming of this polarising debate on the future of food. It posed some difficult and highly-referenced points to disrupt the assumption that Regenerative Agriculture is the answer to feeding the planet. As a festival of ideas, it is important to challenge everything. It was noble of George to attend Groundswell, although it would have been even even more impressive had he stayed on for a couple of drinks in the Earthworm Arms to listen to some of the pioneering regenerative livestock farmers he rallies so strongly against.

    Professor Lennart Olsson from Lund University in Sweden provided a fascinating update on the progress of the radical “perennial revolution” that the Land Institute and their global network are working on. After a stimulating and hot day, unsurprisingly the Earthworm Arms bar became the focal point for further in-depth analysis and discussion. 

    The beer was brewed in part by surplus bread from Toast Ale and brewing enthusiasts headed to the tour at Crossover Blendery where the beer is spontaneously fermented and flavoured by the fruit growing in the agroforestry on the farm. As the sun set, attendees got stuck in to some serious shape throwing on the dancefloor to the groove of funk and soul from DJ Krinks and, in the campsite, history was made as the first Groundswell marriage proposal took place and a happy couple announced their engagement, fittingly on the anniversary of their first embrace at Groundswell 2021. 

    We look forward to the first Groundswell wedding in 2023! Despite a few sore heads and one speaker declaring memory loss from the antics in the early hours, Thursday’s sessions kicked off with stimulating questions proposed: “How is big business adopting regenerative agriculture?” And “Does it make financial sense to go Regen?”. In the Demo Field the line up of manufacturers showcasing their direct drill machines included Weaving, Sky, Dale, Sam Agri, Horsch, Novag, Kverneland, Ryetec, Tuckwells, Amazon, Primewest, Claydon and Horizon. 

    The ground was very dry and the cover crop was bulky with rye volunteers and weeds. As a case study of an innovation born from a meeting at Groundswell, Small Robot Company and Tuckwell’s demonstrated their Treatment Maps Partnership – Tom robot can identify individual weeds in the field and also provide accurate plant counts in a growing crop, whilst also giving an accurate assessment of leaf colour and biomass assessment. This is converted into shape files readable by the sprayer which targets problem areas rather than applying a blanket application to the field. 

    Defra Secretary of State George Eustice was joined on stage by: Minette Batters, tenant farmer and NFU President; Baroness Natalie Bennett, former leader of the Green Party; Tony Juniper, Chair of Natural England; in a panel chaired by Baroness Rosie Boycott, journalist and publisher. Commenting on the show, Eustice said “It’s amazing to see such creative thinking, new ideas being pioneered, new agronomic techniques and indeed, the rediscovery of old ones.” Elsewhere in the programme speakers tackled practical issues such as ‘do potatoes have a place in regen systems?’, ’Improved Nutrient Management with Zero Carbon Fertilisers” and ‘the threat of weeds for regenerative agriculture.’ 

    Hosts John and Paul Cherry led a group to move the mob of beef shorthorns for the last session of the day with Greg Judy providing a refreshing and entertaining commentary on proceedings. We hope the show is re-energising and stimulates new ideas in this fast changing world we live in. If you missed some of the sessions in person, you can watch nearly all of them on the Groundswell YouTube channel. If you have an idea for a great session for next year applications are accepted via the Groundswell website. 

    We’re busy planning already, looking to expand on the offering for small-scale regenerative farmers, new entrants and market gardeners, while not forgetting the retail sector. We are also asking exhibitors to state what they are doing to support Regenerative Practices when they apply for a stand. We hope the show can continue to bring together a forward thinking community whilst regenerative agriculture becomes more widespread within the UK farming industry. Make sure you have the dates in your diary – 28th and 29th June 2023.  

  • Farmer Focus – Tim Parton

    Wow, yet another dry Spring/Summer.  Anybody who doesn’t believe in climate change can hardly deny that temperature and weather conditions are changing!

    This however especially just shows the importance of Carbon (as if it ever wasn’t important!) the extra water holding capacity was vital to keep crops going for those extra days in conditions such as these are vital. Did you know it takes 82 litres of water to grow one apple! Which is why we had small apples around here this year as we just did not get the vital ingredient (Water), we can be fantastic farmers but without water we are going nowhere!

    One crop which really stood out for me on that subject was my Spring Beans, since where I had not grazed my cover crops and drilled on the green using my crimper roller (made by TT engineering) to destroy the cover crop, I had got twice the crop of beans. This was because the soil had been thatched with cover crop, retaining water and keeping the soil cool, allowing biology to keep working for longer. Once soils dry out, biology goes dormant. Once again, I have grown beans with no herbicides, fungicides or insecticides, making them a viable GM:  the ungrazed fields came in at 4.8/ha which for the year I was happy with; unfortunately, the grazed fields came in at half that! Has this changed my opinion of sheep? Yes and No. I feel the answer lies in what works on your own farm (as ever) but for me they are a tool which I can use when needed (we do not own our own sheep, they just come when invited). So, if I had a forward crop that needed reducing for different reasons as in disease etc I would use sheep as a tool to manage the crop! Will I be grazing in front of Beans? Defiantly not!

    Fungicides are, I feel, now a distant memory for me (touch wood!) as once again they have not been used here! The difference in residue breakdown since ceasing their use is remarkable with debris gone very quickly digested by fungi as nature intended, with no barrier there to stop the breakdown.

    Wheat yields were very variable here from 7.5t/ha to 12t/ha; the highest yield coming from the foliar fed crop which was 50kg soil applied N and 28 l foliar applied N.  I did a larger acreage of foliar applied this year (thank goodness). Using sap testing to monitor the crop allows me to put into practice that of Intelligent Farming which allows me to make informed decisions all the way through the growing season. My aim being to achieve top yields with the least investment, but I still do not class myself as a low input farmer as I will spend money if the likely return is going to be there.  That is intelligent farming.

    Working with Edaphos Agronomy we ran a large Nitrogen trial this year, which was not the easiest of Springs to run the trial, but it gave some remarkably interesting results! The most noticeable being that the 240kg/N/ha did not yield any more than 160 kg/ha and was exactly the same for my farm average of 120kg plus 10 L of foliar N. So, is this down to my soils producing more N? Or, was it just the fact that we did not get enough water? Whichever the reason a lot of money was saved across the farm from the old norm of 240kg! Which would have burnt out a lot of Carbon in its excess. Also, my C+arbon foot print for the crop is a lot lower giving me another income potential.

    A new crop for me this year was growing Corn Marigolds and Corn Flowers for seed, for a company called “Yourgreen” who we work in partnership with as Green Farm Collective. These will go into seed packets to be grown on by individuals or companies who want to grow their own biodiversity to make a difference to the planet in which we live. This was a new experience for me regarding combine settings due to the crops having to be cut green! This takes some careful setting up as not to block the combine! A job which should be avoided at all costs! With combing achieved, the next challenge was drying the crop – don’t I just love a challenge!  With such a small amount of seed, a different way was needed……and with the use of pallets and a big fan (see pictures) the job was achieved (result!)

    As you all know, high nutrition food is always my aim on this journey and this year I have invested in the Bionutrient meter which can really start to tell me how good the food is in my garden and on the farm! This to me is really what growing healthy food is all about.  Please see the picture to show what polyphenols do for us all! I have tested my wheat against some conventional wheat, and you can guess which came out top by a long margin! This for me is where I see food production going and will be bought on its health benefits.

    On a lighter note, we have installed a new bird hide on the farm which is a fantastic addition now that we are trading our biodiversity:  which has been done through Green Farm Collective in the form of cover crops and flower/bird food margins.  This is a valuable new income to the farm and one which I hope will grow year on year! The story involved is a valuable story and one which the sponsor will use to sell their business in what they are doing to their customers. Days will include bird watching and the planting of trees which is all part of the package. Remember we as farmers are the heroes of the world as we are the only ones that can feed a growing population and heal the planet at the same time! Which is why it’s so important that we stand together (for once) and not sell ourselves short on the Carbon / Biodiversity market.

  • Small Robot Co Launches Robot Services To 50 Farms This Autumn

    A major milestone for our small robots: our Tom monitoring robots will be set to work this Autumn. 50 farms will
    become home to our sustainable robots, delivering our first services for Per Plant Farming: applications by exception.

    These autonomous scanning robots will help farmers make informed decisions on how to take action, cutting herbicides and fertilisers. Co designed with 35 farmer advisors and trial customers, including the Waitrose Leckford Estate, the Sainsbury family Lockerley Estate and the National Trust Wimpole estate, we are excited to see our technology in action commercially this growing season.

    This is a big step forward in delivering real value to farmers. Partnering with leading John Deere dealer Tuckwells, we have integrated Tom’s treatment maps with existing precision sprayers, saving around 77% of herbicide, and estimated15% fertiliser savings. This will help farm businesses become both more environmentally and financially sustainable.

    Transforming farming at the plant level

    We see our bigger picture mission as helping farmers feed the world whilst regenerating the planet. Through the creation of a new farming model ‘Per Plant Farming’, we are making it possible to give farmers the confidence to only take action when it is required. Working with farmers to transform the system from the plant level, our sustainable farming robots Tom, Dick and Harry bring an entirely new way of farming. Using robotics and AI, we autonomously monitor and treat each crop plant. This means problem weeds can be targeted individually, as opposed to the whole field. This new model enables a highly precise approach to farming, which today is more important than ever before, as farmers face the volatility of the industry. Farmers are under increasing pressure, with input costs on the rise. Research from Harper Adams shows that up to 90% of inputs are wasted. This is not economically or environmentally viable.

    Robotics gives huge scope to close the gap: delivering applications by exception. Precision monitoring alone can provide immediate value, optimising existing sprayers for herbicide and fertiliser applications. But we believe that’s just the tip of the iceberg in terms of the potential for what per-plant farming can deliver, both in input-cost savings and yield enhancement. Ultimately, input costs and environmental impact will be significantly minimised.

    Commercial Service Launch

    Our first commercial robots will soon be seen scanning across fields this2022-2023 growing season. The service will optimise farmer’s existing sprayer equipment to reduce costs and inputs. Per Plant Intelligence from our Tom monitoring robot means we treat only the problem areas: nutrient deficiencies, and weeds. Scanning the field, our Tom robot builds an understanding of where every plant is and what each one needs to achieve optimal performance. The data that is collected is then processed and detected by ‘Wilma’, our AI Advice Engine. Wilma then creates treatment maps to advise farmers on the most appropriate action to take. This information is used to inform variable rate fertiliser applications and to spot-apply herbicides through nozzle control and sectional control sprays. This gives farmers the confidence to take action only when required or even make ‘no spray’ decisions.

    The 2022 service is fully subscribed, with 2023 orders now underway. 50farms have signed up to our ‘Farming as Service’, with groups of up to six local farmers joining together to forma ‘Pod’ of 120 ha. They will share a Tom robot, committing a minimum of 20ha each. This means farmers can try out the service on as little  as 20ha, without a costly machinery outlay. Each farm will receive 4 scans of their wheat fields during a season. The new service offering will target winter wheat crop count and Per Plant visualisation; weed detection, geolocation and per plant imagery; glyphosate treatment sprayer export; herbicide treatment sprayer export; and fertiliser treatment sprayer export.

    The launch follows the successful on-farm trials on three farms during the Autumn 2021 to 2022 growing season to develop the service. These trials included Waitrose Leckford Estate and the Lockerly Estate, owned by the Sainsbury family. The trials covered 118ha, locating 446M wheat plants in which 4.6M weeds were identified.

    Precision weed control

    The weed surveys conducted over the season by SRC highlighted the fact that a blanket approach to treating weeds is not only costly but often unnecessary. The surveys found that only a few areas were high in density: surprisingly only a few areas had weed density of more than weed/m². We then used this information to create heat maps, meaning farmers can treat only the problem areas, precisely. Our service enables farmers to assess weed density information for no spray decisions, and to reduce herbicide use by around 77% at a conservative estimate, depending on weed density and distribution.

    Optimising crop nutrition

    Farmers can also assess crop health and performance, reducing fertiliser costs by around 15%, as well as optimising crop nutrition. These are achieved through a combination of data including accurately gauging green area index and plant populations. The radical change here is that our monitoring service now allows for application by exception, rather than blanket precautionary measure. By also being precise in targeting weeds, our robots also help farmers protect biodiversity, preserving the natural environment, in particular strengthening soil health, which is essential to encourage optimal crop yield.

    Longer term there is considerable potential for far greater savings. With rising fertiliser costs coupled with the industry attention on Net Zero, this has been in the spotlight, and is a strategic focus for our future roadmap. Fertiliser alone is a major contributor to agricultural emissions. This could have a huge contribution to reducing costs and carbon footprint, with no loss of crop productivity.

    A robot’s eye view

    Tom’s eight on-board cameras, mounted on a boom, deliver a ground sample distance of 0.39mm per pixel.  Among the highest resolution of any crop-scanning technology, this gives Tom the capability to see individual water droplets on leaves and early signs of disease outbreak. SRC’s Tom monitoring robot scans the crop to a level of detail that identifies individual plants, gathering data on plant and weed distribution to determine the optimum treatment path. Tom will accurately geolocate and analyse data on every plant in the field. Tom can successfully identify all the wheat plants, determining precise plant counts, as well as broadleaf weeds. With a survey speed of 2.2ha/hr, Tom gathers 15,000 images from its cameras, or 40Gb of per plant intelligence, for every hectare.

    Tuckwells partnership

    To develop the sprayer integration we partnered with Tuckwells, one of the UK’s leading John Deere dealerships, which has a focus on industry-leading design and technology. In trials completed last spring, we created a treatment map for Tuckwells’,covering a 14.5ha field in Suffolk, achieving a 97% saving of an early spring herbicide. The trial data was run through JD’s Operation Centre and the treatment map for herbicide in wheat supplied to a Mazzoti sprayer with individual nozzle control over its36m boom.

    The trial found that only 3% of the field actually needed to be sprayed(0.42ha), resulting in a herbicide saving of £24.48/ha. If the field had been treated with a JD R962i sprayer with 3m sectional control, it would have sprayed 13% of the field area, saving £21.96/ha. Another advantage for farmers is knowing how much will need to be applied before filling up the sprayer – what is put in the tank is what you use, nothing will be wasted. “We’ve been looking for the next innovation in precision application of herbicides and robotics seems to be the way forward,” says George Whelan, Tuckwell’s Group Technologies Manager, who coordinates their new technologies.

    “Weed identification is the key and the AI element is the most exciting part. We can use the data from Wilma to create an application map and deliver real in-field solutions.”

    Co-designed with Farmers

    These results highlight the extensive potential for robotics within farming today. This will have a huge impact for farmers, reducing input costs, this in turn both increasing and optimising yields, whilst protecting the natural environment.

    Our service is designed by farmers for farmers to create a farming system without compromise. Working with farmers to inform the developments of our technology has been invaluable. These close partnerships of more than5 years with our farmer advisors has enabled us to accurately pin-point the challenges and pain points to tackle providing a wealth of information. The foundations of our service are based on the farmer; technology should not take control, but rather work in partnership with farmers.

    Accelerating regenerative

    We believe these systematic changes in farming today are crucial in progressing towards regenerative farming practices. Stewardship for our soil health and the natural environment today is essential to ensure future generations can produce high quality crops both profitably and sustainably. Now is the time for us to work together to create a more ecologically harmonious farming model. For farmers – rightly – to be rewarded for their efforts. Farmers are integral to the environmental solution.

    We’re excited to see our technology get to work on farms this season, but this is only the beginning. The potential is endless. Technological innovation will be a keystone in the Fourth Agricultural Revolution, and we’re honoured that our small robots are part of this revolutionary change. Helping build the food system of tomorrow.

  • FixOurFood means FixOurSoils

    This year the University of Leeds has launched a project researching regenerative farming systems in Yorkshire. This project is part of the FixOurFood programme led by the University of York, funded by UK Research and Innovation, a government fund to support research to investigate ways to transform the UK food system. As the challenge to address the food system nationally is so large, the FixOurFood project is focusing on Yorkshire as a pilot region to explore regenerative approaches that could be scaled to the UK and beyond. The project focuses on three areas of innovation 1. sustainable and healthy food for children, 2. hybrid business models and 3. regenerative farming systems.

    Researchers from the University of Leeds Prof Lisa Collins, Prof Steve Banwart, Prof Pippa Chapman, Dr Gesa Reiss and Dr Ruth Wade, are leading the regenerative farming systems research in Yorkshire. Yorkshire has a large variety of farming systems, containing 13 – 17% of the UK’s crop production area and 10 – 14% of the UK’s livestock headcount, with a large diversity of soil and land cover in the region and an established network of innovative farmers. This makes Yorkshire a ideal place to investigate and understand the complex dynamics of farming systems. Together with key networks and alliances, the team at the University of Leeds are exploring existing examples of regenerative farming in the region, identifying the limiting environmental, social and economic factors, and discovering practical steps needed to support shifts towards regenerative farming. The research group will then determine what the regional potential is for implementation, and if regenerative agriculture could contribute to combat global warming if scaled up nationally.

    Earlier this year, they released a survey to ask farmers what the University can do to support regenerative farming. Four key areas were identified which will be the focus of the project going forwards.

    From this survey they also sought to understand the opinions, opportunities, current activities and challenges associated with regenerative agriculture. To date, they have received 166 responses, 147 (89%) said they were farmers and 79% from England. Responses came mostly from those already practicing elements of regenerative agriculture, with the majority of participants stating the main aim of regenerative agriculture was to ‘improve soil quality and fertility’ and the main motivation to move towards regenerative practices was to ‘improve soil health’. Most participants were using cover crops and direct drilling, and were most interested in reducing agrochemical inputs and increasing diversity in arable rotations. They felt the biggest challenge of moving towards regenerative agriculture was the ‘lack of information on good practice’, ‘lack of evidence’ and concerns over ‘reductions in yield’.

    To support evidence-based practice, the University of Leeds is using its 317ha research farm to trial and test regenerative farming practices. The University of Leeds farm has been developed as a digitally connected smart-farm and terrestrial observatory. The main activity is a field-scale, replicated experiment using a historically conventionally managed field and measure the impacts of different transitions to regenerative agricultural practices on the soil, crop, greenhouse gas emissions and profit. This trial is in collaboration with NIAB whose Northern Regional Centre is based at the University of Leeds farm. The trial has been designed with advice from researchers and farmers from Yorkshire with seven treatments that range from a ploughed-based conventional farming system, through to significant changes in rotation and the inclusion of grazing livestock.

    Key

    The experiment began last month but prior to any cultivations, Dr Ruth Wade led a team of researchers to collect baseline measurements of the soils current physical, chemical and biological status. The farm is on fine loamy soils (Aberford Series) and the team collected soil samples at 10cm intervals down to a depth of 50cm. These soil samples are currently being analysed in the lab for measurements such as soil structure, aggregate sizes, water holding capacity, carbon and nitrogen content. Throughout the trial, researchers from the project team will be measuring the impacts of the different transition approaches on soil health, crop growth, agronomy, greenhouse gas emissions, and economics. Soil sensors and automated greenhouse gas measurement chambers will be installed in the experimental plots to collect real-time high frequency measurements. In addition to collecting data, the trial will be used as a regional demonstration platform for farmers to view and discuss different management practices, and the learnings and outcomes will be fed back to the larger FixOurFood programme policy and governance team at City University.

    We know from experience that soils must ‘earn’ the right to be direct drilled, which in practice means resolving any existing soil health issues before switching to a direct drill system. The soil assessments carried out by the researchers indicated that the historic intensive cultivations and high field traffic have caused soil structural issues that needed to be addressed. Therefore, the treatments transitioning to regenerative agriculture have received a non-inversion, shallow cultivation in the first year to alleviate the soil structural issues, whilst beginning the transition to regenerative management. Drilling will be carried out using a Ryetec MAAG SSP Direct Drill as it is a flexible machine allowing us to drill effectively across the range of cultivation treatments with one drill.

    Pig manure was supplied by the University of Leeds National Pig Centre (based at the University of Leeds farm) and was spread on those plots receiving FYM using the Morley Agricultural Foundation small plot manure spreader that allowed the farmyard manure to be applied at a specific rate and only to those plots that required it.

    Companion crops and herbal ley seeds were broadcasted and rolled, and the establishment of winter wheat single varieties and winter wheat blends will happen in the autumn.

    We will continue to monitor and report on the project, if you would like to know more information or sign up to the newsletter please contact us through the FixOurFood website https://fixourfood.org/

    There are many farmers in Yorkshire exploring different management practices and we hope that this project is the start of a significant effort to support farmers in the region.

    Dr Ruth Wade, University of Leeds

    Dr Joseph Martlew, NIAB

  • Farmer Focus – Clive Bailye

    Power Corrupts

    There are two occasions in my farming year that remind me of the anticipation and trepidation felt as a child when my exam results or end of term school report were received. The first is of course harvest, yields being the score card for the team effort of all involved in every part of the growing process. As the loads roll in and pass over the weighbridge filling barns we reflect upon what we got right and what we got wrong in the seemingly never-ending, life long quest for growing perfection that only a farmer can ever understand. It is this that drives, innovates and motivates never ending improvement for the next year.

    The reality however is we are all, mostly, out of control of the yield outcome. That “goldilocks” year of not too wet, not too dry, not too hot or not too cold rarely, if ever, comes and there is always something that could have been done better or at different timing with the benefit of hind sight. This year I suspect many will be reflecting upon agronomic decisions such as how different synthetic fertiliser rates and strategies have impacted yield (or not) or variety and input timing choice but in truth, what will have determined all our yields more than any other factor will be the soil we have and the weather we got.

    The second set of results is the end of our financial year which runs with the calendar to the 1st of January and this is the really important set of results that reflect our management of the business and its ability to adapt to whatever season we are dealt, financial performance is something we have almost complete control over, our input /output buying and selling decisions, our labour and machinery spends and our agronomic strategy can all be adapted as inevitably weather and trading situations change. 

    I do say “almost” complete control however as there is nearly always something unexpected and an element of luck that could never be planed for or expected by even the most perfect of management business plan, that unexpected major mechanical failure or that out of the blue ill health or personal issue.

    Whilst financial contingency for that u n e x p e c t e d breakdown can be budgeted for to some extent it’s the latter personal and staffing issues that can be a lot harder to plan for and disruptive to workload, time cannot be easily bought, or can it?

    For an arable farm to be profitable these days requires absolute focus on minimising fixed costs. Highly skilled operators are both one of the harder to find and more increasingly expensive resources for many farms. Larger machinery has provided great opportunity to reduce the need for so many to be involved in establishment, care and harvesting of crops and although larger, higher output machines are of course more expensive their cost is somewhat mitigated by the needs for far fewer of them to complete workloads in a timely fashion.

    Regardless of a farms establishment strategy the trend to larger machinery has been common over the last couple of decades. At the start of my farming career our “big” tractor was a Ford 8240, which I think was just about 100hp. That tractor comfortably ploughed and established all our crops with a power harrow combination drill on around 250 arable acres we farmed at the time, I can’t recall ever thinking we needed more power but did aspire to a 8340 or even a mighty TW model one day …….. just “because” my neighbours had one. Vanity and ego can be an expensive aspiration for a young farmer as I would learn.

    As acres farmed grew, labour became harder to find and justify, the tractors got bigger to pull increasingly wide cultivation and drilling equipment. Eventually power no longer seemed the limiting factor and traction did. The more powerful tractors had got a lot heavier the 270 hp John Deere 8410 we had “grown into” being more than twice the weight of that 90hp Ford 7810 and despite big advances in tyre technology and large sizes somewhat reducing the damage to soils that weight can do tracks were the inevitable next step, first 8520T’s and ultimately the pinnacle of BIG tractors at the time the mighty Challenger 875, all 25t and over 600hp of it!

    Pulling the (very on trend at the time) Simba solo followed by a Vaderstad rapid cultivator drill it offered massive outputs vs that old 90hp plough / combi drill system, one man was comfortably establishing probably ten times the area that the Ford 8240 was capable of. It came at a cost however and despite that x10 capacity of work I have a suspicion it may have had a cost in both capital and running costs that was more thanx10 the 100hp system! Many large arable farms still run similar systems today, many will claim it’s “cheaper” to do so quoting all sorts of nonsense about economies of scale and paying high rents or entering contract farming arrangements to justify the machinery. It rarely is however, and I will be honest, the main reason I had a 610hp tractor back in 2007 was really because I wanted a 610hp tractor……. I probably just made the rest and the numbers “fit”. I don’t think I’m the first or will be the last young and ambitious farmers to apply such warped logic to my thinking.

    So, what problem does big solve? the answer is labour, “big” does buy time. The ten 90hp tractors needed to cover the same workload we had at the time would have required 10 skilled operators, skilled labour is hard to find on a seasonal basis and on a purely combinable cropped farm the labour requirement is for relatively small periods of the year. Fewer full-time staff equals less costs and less problems, easier management, fewer of the most unpredictable of variables, people. However as is so often the case, as you solve one problem you create others. Power corrupts, it allows you to do things you probably shouldn’t like to cultivate too deep or in conditions that you shouldn’t. It changes mindset about what we need, writing this article I really find it hard to believe that just 20years ago a 100hp tractor was all we ever needed, it  seems that once your goal post has been moved its hard to remember what was possible.

    Power adds weight, lots of weight! combined with that ability to force work when conditions are not right that power can quickly add up to a lot of damage to soils, this damage needs cultivation to fix it and so the vicious circles begins where cultivation creates the need for cultivation, power requirement increases and costs spiral. This “hamster wheel” of tillage farming is very difficult to break and faced with solving that many are simply unable to accept that it is even possible to do so. For every no-till farmer I have ever met evangelical about the change to his soils and bottom line I come across a similar number of farmers, equally as convinced they have no choice but to cultivate, their soils are somehow “different”, their farm is somehow “different”, they are somehow “different”. They may well be right, farming in the UK is anything but consistent and every farm is indeed different, there is no rule book on crop establishment and my advice to any farmer is do what works and what you are comfortable with, only change if you either want or need to.

    A good exercise for any farmer is to look back at what power levels they were using and felt they needed 20yrs ago on their soils and ask themselves if they could manage with that today? If for any other reason than increased workload the answer is not then something is wrong, your soil and your farm is not moving forward, and the situation is probably not sustainable, just maybe that is highlighting the need for change even if that change may not always be a comfortable one, maybe the need to change is greater than you realise?

    Moving to direct drilling of course offers an alternative way to cut the labour fixed cost but this time in a very different way to the high horsepower route. By removing the entire operation of cultivation the hours required in the seat are massively reduced. This allowed us to get away from the painful costs of the big tractors and return to what has always felt to me like a much more sensible size and cost of versatile machines.

    We began with a second-hand 4m direct drill and had a240hp tractor pull it which was too big for that drill, the tractor size being based around where the best deals were and a power requirement to pull large grain trailers at harvest and facilitate move away from costly self-propelled sprayers to trailed alternative rather than dictated by high draft cultivators and drills.

    The 4m drill successfully proved the no-tillage concept to us and was quite quickly replaced by a 6m version of the same brand that felt better paired to the tractor. Direct drills are much lower draft requirement than their min-till or cultivation counterparts. Wider row spacings means today we power a12m direct drill with the same 240hp tractor, that gives work rates of up to 300ac a day possible if fields are large enough and logistics can keep up. It is a truly huge capacity way beyond that of any establishment system we ever had before, far more than we need in fact affording us the luxury choosing our timing, improving the agronomic prospects of the crop hopefully and importantly reducing our risk of failure due to factors beyond our control like weather. This time “Big” has bought us time whilst genuinely reducing fixed costs and not just moving those cost from the labour column to the machinery column in those important budgets and year end accounts. This time “Big” makes business sense and is no longer ego.

  • Small Robot Co launches robot services to 50 farms this autumn

    A major milestone for our small robots: our Tom monitoring robots will be set to work this Autumn. 50 farms will become home to our sustainable robots, delivering our first services for Per Plant Farming: applications by exception. These autonomous scanning robots will help farmers make informed decisions on how to take action, cutting herbicides and fertilisers. 

    Co-designed with 35 farmer advisors and trial customers, including the Waitrose Leckford Estate, the Sainsbury family Lockerley Estate and the National Trust Wimpole estate, we are excited to see our technology in action commercially this growing season. This is a big step forward in delivering real value to farmers. Partnering with leading John Deere dealer Tuckwells, we have integrated Tom’s treatment maps with existing precision sprayers, saving around 77% of herbicide, and estimated 15% fertiliser savings. This will help farm businesses become both more environmentally and financially sustainable. 

    Transforming farming at the plant level 

    We see our bigger picture mission as helping farmers feed the world whilst regenerating the planet. Through the creation of a new farming model ‘Per Plant Farming’, we are making it possible to give farmers the confidence to only take action when it is required. Working with farmers to transform the system from the plant level, our sustainable farming robots Tom, Dick and Harry bring an entirely new way of farming. 

    Using robotics and AI, we autonomously monitor and treat each crop plant. This means problem weeds can be targeted individually, as opposed to the whole field. This new model enables a highly precise approach to farming, which today is more important than ever before, as farmers face the volatility of the industry. Farmers are under increasing pressure, with input costs on the rise. Research from Harper Adams shows that up to 90% of inputs are wasted. 

    This is not economically or environmentally viable. Robotics gives huge scope to close the gap: delivering applications by exception. Precision monitoring alone can provide immediate value, optimising existing sprayers for herbicide and fertiliser applications. But we believe that’s just the tip of the iceberg in terms of the potential for what per-plant farming can deliver, both in input-cost savings and yield enhancement. Ultimately, input costs and environmental impact will be significantly minimised.

    Commercial Service Launch 

    Our first commercial robots will soon be seen scanning across fields this 2022-2023 growing season. The service will optimise farmer’s existing sprayer equipment to reduce costs and inputs. Per Plant Intelligence from our Tom monitoring robot means we treat only the problem areas: nutrient deficiencies, and weeds. Scanning the field, our Tom robot builds an understanding of where every plant is and what each one needs to achieve optimal performance. The data that is collected is then processed and detected by ‘Wilma’, our AI Advice Engine. 

    Wilma then creates treatment maps to advise farmers on the most appropriate action to take. This information is used to inform variable rate fertiliser applications and to spot-apply herbicides through nozzle control and sectional control sprays. This gives farmers the confidence to take action only when required or even make ‘no spray’ decisions. The 2022 service is fully subscribed, with 2023 orders now underway. 50 farms have signed up to our ‘Farming as Service’, with groups of up to six local farmers joining together to form a ‘Pod’ of 120 ha. 

    They will share a Tom robot, committing a minimum of 20ha each. This means farmers can try out the service on as little as 20ha, without a costly machinery outlay. Each farm will receive 4 scans of their wheat fields during a season. The new service offering will target winter wheat crop count and Per Plant visualisation; weed detection, geolocation and per plant imagery; glyphosate treatment sprayer export; herbicide treatment sprayer export; and fertiliser treatment sprayer export. The launch follows the successful on-farm trials on three farms during the Autumn 2021 to 2022 growing season to develop the service. 

    These trials included Waitrose Leckford Estate and the Lockerly Estate, owned by the Sainsbury family. The trials covered 118ha, locating 446M wheat plants in which 4.6M weeds were identified. 

    Precision weed control 

    The weed surveys conducted over the season by SRC highlighted the fact that a blanket approach to treating weeds is not only costly but often unnecessary. The surveys found that only a few areas were high in density: surprisingly only a few areas had weed density of more than weed/m². We then used this information to create heat maps, meaning farmers can treat only the problem areas, precisely. Our service enables farmers to assess weed density information for no spray decisions, and to reduce herbicide use by around 77% at a conservative estimate, depending on weed density and distribution.

    Optimising crop nutrition 

    Farmers can also assess crop health and performance, reducing fertiliser costs by around 15%, as well as optimising crop nutrition. These are achieved through a combination of data including accurately gauging green area index and plant populations. The radical change here is that our monitoring service now allows for application by exception, rather than blanket precautionary measure. By also being precise in targeting weeds, our robots also help farmers protect biodiversity, preserving the natural environment, in particular strengthening soil health, which is essential to encourage optimal crop yield. Longer term there is considerable potential for far greater savings. With rising fertiliser costs coupled with the industry attention on Net Zero, this has been in the spotlight, and is a strategic focus for our future roadmap. Fertiliser alone is a major contributor to agricultural emissions. This could have a huge contribution to reducing costs and carbon footprint, with no loss of crop productivity. 

    A robot’s eye view 

    Tom’s eight on-board cameras, mounted on a boom, deliver a ground sample distance of 0.39mm per pixel. Among the highest resolution of any crop-scanning technology, this gives Tom the capability to see individual water droplets on leaves and early signs of disease outbreak. SRC’s Tom monitoring robot scans the crop to a level of detail that identifies individual plants, gathering data on plant and weed distribution to determine the optimum treatment path. 

    Tom will accurately geolocate and analyse data on every plant in the field. Tom can successfully identify all the wheat plants, determining precise plant counts, as well as broadleaf weeds. With a survey speed of 2.2ha/hr, Tom gathers 15,000 images from its cameras, or 40Gb of per plant intelligence, for every hectare. 

    Tuckwells partnership 

    To develop the sprayer integration we partnered with Tuckwells, one of the UK’s leading John Deere dealerships, which has a focus on industry-leading design and technology. In trials completed last spring, we created a treatment map for Tuckwells’, covering a 14.5ha field in Suffolk, achieving a 97% saving of an early spring herbicide. The trial data was run through JD’s Operation Centre and the treatment map for herbicide in wheat supplied to a Mazzoti sprayer with individual nozzle control over its 36m boom. 

    The trial found that only 3% of the field actually needed to be sprayed (0.42ha), resulting in a herbicide saving of £24.48/ha. If the field had been treated with a JD R962i sprayer with 3m sectional control, it would have sprayed 13% of the field area, saving £21.96/ha. Another advantage for farmers is knowing how much will need to be applied before filling up the sprayer – what is put in the tank is what you use, nothing will be wasted. “We’ve been looking for the next innovation in precision application of herbicides and robotics seems to be the way forward,” says George Whelan, Tuckwell’s Group Technologies Manager, who coordinates their new technologies. “Weed identification is the key and the AI element is the most exciting part. 

    We can use the data from Wilma to create an application map and deliver real in-field solutions.” 

    Co-designed with Farmers 

    These results highlight the extensive potential for robotics within farming today. This will have a huge impact for farmers, reducing input costs, this in turn both increasing and optimising yields, whilst protecting the natural environment. 

    Our service is designed by farmers for farmers to create a farming system without compromise. Working with farmers to inform the developments of our technology has been invaluable. These close partnerships of more than 5 years with our farmer advisors has enabled us to accurately pin-point the challenges and pain points to tackle providing a wealth of information. The foundations of our service are based on the farmer; technology should not take control, but rather work in partnership with farmers. 

    Accelerating regenerative 

    We believe these systematic changes in farming today are crucial in progressing towards regenerative farming practices. Stewardship for our soil health and the natural environment today is essential to ensure future generations can produce high quality crops both profitably and sustainably. Now is the time for us to work together to create a more ecologically harmonious farming model. For farmers – rightly – to be rewarded for their efforts. Farmers are integral to the environmental solution. We’re excited to see our technology get to work on farms this season, but this is only the beginning. The potential is endless. Technological innovation will be a keystone in the Fourth Agricultural Revolution, and we’re honoured that our small robots are part of this revolutionary change. Helping build the food system of tomorrow.

  • Nutrient Use Efficiency Study

    Multi-year soil health study measuring differences in nutrient availability

    Over the past several years, agricultural industries have been focused on the Nitrogen(N) portion for improving soil and plant efficiency. However, we cannot forget the importance of the remaining primary, secondary, and micronutrients. This research report highlights how L-CBF not only capitalizes on N use efficiency but also unlocks the remaining primary, secondary and micronutrient abilities as well.

    A Two-Year Study [2020 & 2021] measuring Soil Health, Overall Nutrient Use Efficiency, and Nitrogen Use Efficiency [QLF Agronomy. (2022). Soil health and nitrogen use efficiency study. RT6530, p.1] was accomplished at an independent research station near Martinsville, Illinois. QLF Agronomy Research compared a blend of 10% Liquid Carbon-Based Fertilizer L-CBF BOOST™ 4-0-3-2 S and90% Urea Ammonium Nitrate [UAN 28%], as opposed to a full rate of UAN 28%.Six-inch depth soil samples were acquired in a grid pattern before pre-emerged [broadcast] and side-dress[Y-Drop @ V4-5] fertilizer applications were utilized. Samples were retaken two weeks after the broadcast and side-dress applications [e.g., post fertilizer applications],thus were evaluated to the first set of soil samples exercising Haney’s Soil Health Test Procedure.

    Plant growth and development depends on their ability to sequester all mineral nutrients from the soil. Plants often encounter considerable challenges in attaining an adequate quantity of these mineral nutrients to meet the requirements of cellular progressions due to the irrelative immobility. Nutrient deficiency can also lead to reduced overall soil biodiversity since plants serve as the manufacturers that support most food webs. The four charts below validate how ten percent L-CBF BOOST™ inclusion with UAN 28% improved nutrient availability for plant growth and development while providing the soil microbes with biodiversity. Each graph exhibits that all mineral nutrient listed, beyond N, has surpassed nutrient efficiency over the control treatment, thus proving that L-CBF products have the necessary tools to compete effectively in today’s high-demand agricultural sector.

  • Farmer Focus – Clive Bailye

    October 2022

    Power Corrupts

    There are two occasions in my farming year that remind me of the anticipation and trepidation felt as a child when my exam results or end of term school report were received. The first is of course harvest, yields being the score card for the team effort of all involved in every part of the growing process. As the loads roll in and pass over the weighbridge filling barns we reflect upon what we got right and what we got wrong in the seemingly never-ending, life long quest for growing perfection that only a farmer can ever understand. 

    It is this that drives, innovates and motivates never ending improvement for the next year. The reality however is we are all, mostly, out of control of the yield outcome. That “goldilocks” year of not too wet, not too dry, not too hot or not too cold rarely, if ever, comes and there is always something that could have been done better or at different timing with the benefit of hindsight. This year I suspect many will be reflecting upon agronomic decisions such as how different synthetic fertiliser rates and strategies have impacted yield (or not) or variety and input timing choice but in truth, what will have determined all our yields more than any other factor will be the soil we have and the weather we got. 

    Getting bigger, power replaced the need for the plough

    The second set of results is the end of our financial year which runs with the calendar to the 1st of January and this is the really important set of results that reflect our management of the business and its ability to adapt to whatever season we are dealt, financial performance is something we have almost complete control over, our input /output buying and selling decisions, our labour and machinery spends and our agronomic strategy can all be adapted as inevitably weather and trading situations change. I do say “almost” complete control however as there is nearly always something unexpected and an element of luck that could never be planed for or expected by even the most perfect of management business plan, that unexpected major mechanical failure or that out of the blue ill health or personal issue.

    Whilst financial contingency for that unexpected breakdown can be budgeted for to some extent it’s the latter personal and staffing issues that can be a lot harder to plan for and disruptive to workload, time cannot be easily bought, or can it? For an arable farm to be profitable these days requires absolute focus on minimising fixed costs. Highly skilled operators are both one of the harder to find and more increasingly expensive resources for many farms. 

    Larger machinery has provided great opportunity to reduce the need for so many to be involved in establishment, care and harvesting of crops and although larger, higher output machines are of course more expensive their cost is somewhat mitigated by the needs for far fewer of them to complete workloads in a timely fashion. Regardless of a farms establishment strategy the trend to larger machinery has been common over the last couple of decades. At the start of my farming career our “big” tractor was a Ford 8240, which I think was just about 100hp. 

    The ultimate big power at the time,  the only way up from here was down

    That tractor comfortably ploughed and established all our crops with a power harrow combination drill on around 250 arable acres we farmed at the time, I can’t recall ever thinking we needed more power but did aspire to a 8340 or even a mighty TW model one day …….. just “because” my neighbours had one. Vanity and ego can be an expensive aspiration for a young farmer as I would learn. As acres farmed grew, labour became harder to find and justify, the tractors got bigger to pull increasingly wide cultivation and drilling equipment. Eventually power no longer seemed the limiting factor and traction did. 

    The more powerful tractors had got a lot heavier the 270 hp John Deere 8410 we had “grown into” being more than twice the weight of that 90 hp Ford 7810 and despite big advances in tyre technology and large sizes somewhat reducing the damage to soils that weight can do tracks were the inevitable next step, first 8520T’s and ultimately the pinnacle of BIG tractors at the time the mighty Challenger 875, all 25t and over 600hp of it! 

    Pulling the (very on trend at the time) Simba solo followed by a Vaderstad rapid cultivator drill it offered massive outputs vs that old 90hp plough / combi drill system, one man was comfortably establishing probably ten times the area that the Ford 8240 was capable of. It came at a cost however and despite that x10 capacity of work I have a suspicion it may have had a cost in both capital and running costs that was more than x10 the 100hp system! 

    A new kind of smarter big, efficient big not just big ego

    Many large arable farms still run similar systems today, many will claim it’s “cheaper” to do so quoting all sorts of nonsense about economies of scale and paying high rents or entering contract farming arrangements to justify the machinery. It rarely is however, and I will be honest, the main reason I had a 610hp tractor back in 2007 was really because I wanted a 610hp tractor……. I probably just made the rest and the numbers “fit”. I don’t think I’m the first or will be the last young and ambitious farmers to apply such warped logic to my thinking. So, what problem does big solve? the answer is labour, “big” does buy time. 

    The ten 90hp tractors needed to cover the same workload we had at the time would have required 10 skilled operators, skilled labour is hard to find on a seasonal basis and on a purely combinable cropped farm the labour requirement is for relatively small periods of the year. Fewer full-time staff equals less costs and less problems, easier management, fewer of the most unpredictable of variables, people. However as is so often the case, as you solve one problem you create others. Power corrupts, it allows you to do things you probably shouldn’t like to cultivate too deep or in conditions that you shouldn’t. 

    It changes mindset about what we need, writing this article I really find it hard to believe that just 20years ago a 100hp tractor was all we ever needed, it seems that once your goal post has been moved its hard to remember what was possible. Power adds weight, lots of weight! combined with that ability to force work when conditions are not right that power can quickly add up to a lot of damage to soils, this damage needs cultivation to fix it and so the vicious circles begins where cultivation creates the need for cultivation, power requirement increases and costs spiral. 

    This “hamster wheel” of tillage farming is very difficult to break and faced with solving that many are simply unable to accept that it is even possible to do so. For every no-till farmer I have ever met evangelical about the change to his soils and bottom line I come across a similar number of farmers, equally as convinced they have no choice but to cultivate, their soils are somehow “different”, their farm is somehow “different”, they are somehow “different”. They may well be right, farming in the UK is anything but consistent and every farm is indeed different, there is no rule book on crop establishment and my advice to any farmer is do what works

  • Does No-Till Mean Less Nitrous Oxide In The Atmosphere?

    Reducing tillage could result in less production of a potent greenhouse gas, according to a study out of
    Penn State University.

    Nitrous oxide, also known as “laughing gas,” is the most important greenhouse gas after methane and carbon dioxide and the biggest human-related threat to the ozone layer. But is talked about less. Nitrous oxide emissions from human activities have ballooned 30 percent over the past four decades. Although carbon dioxide has been responsible for about 10 times as much warming as nitrous oxide. But nitrous oxide is more potent: 1kg of the gas warms the atmosphere some 300times more than 1kg of carbon does over a 100-year period. With Nitrous Oxide staying in the atmosphere for around a century after release. In arable farming N2O is emitted naturally as part of the nitrification process it is a by product of the application of nitrogen fertilisers. The paper that researched this is called “Tillage intensity and plant rhizosphere selection shape bacterial-archaeal assemblage diversity and nitrogen cycling genes” and was published in the journal “Soil and Tillage Research.” You can read the whole paper by following the QR Code.

    Abstract

    We evaluated bulk and rhizosphere soils from two crop years(corn and soybean) of a three-year rotation of corn-soybean small grain + cover crop. Soil samples were collected at three growth stages from corn and soybean plants and across three tillage practices that had been applied every year for 40 years. Tillage practices represented three levels of disturbance intensity ranging from no-till, to intermediate to high (plough) intensities. Bacterial assemblage diversity differed in soils having contrasting tillage histories and from bulk or rhizosphere soil (compartments), crop year, and growth stage. Compared to ploughed and disc soils, no-till soils had lower abundances of denitrification genes, higher abundances of genes for dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonium (DNRA), and higher abundances of family-level taxa associated with archaeal nitrification and anammox. Soybean rhizospheres exerted stronger selection on bacterial-archaeal composition and diversity relative to corn rhizospheres. Abundances of N genes were grouped by factors related to weather, as well as management and soil compartment, which could impact activity related to denitrification and DNRA. Low intensity tillage may provide an option to reduce potential ‘hot spots’ or ‘hot moments’ for N losses in agricultural soils, although weather and crop type are also important factors that can influence how tillage affects microbial assemblages and microbial N use.

    Notes from the Paper

    Researchers ultimately found DNA evidence that members of families of bacteria capable of turning N into ammonium were more common in bulk no-tilled soil than in soils for minimum or high tillage. What is more, no-till soils contained fewer genes for bacteria known to create N2O from nitrogen.

    Conclusion

    Results of this study suggest that minimizing disturbances to agricultural soils may provide an opportunity for reducing N2O emissions.

  • QLF – Nutrient Use Efficiency Study

    MULTI-YEAR SOIL HEALTH STUD MEASURING DIFFERENCES IN NUTRIENT AVAILABILITY

    Summary

    Over the past several years, agricultural industries have been focused on the Nitrogen(N) portion for improving soil and plant efficiency. However, we cannot forget the importance of the remaining primary, secondary, and micronutrients. This research report highlights how L-CBF not only capitalizes on N use efficiency but also unlocks the remaining primary, secondary and micronutrient abilities as well.
    A Two-Year Study [2020 & 2021] measuring Soil Health, Overall Nutrient Use Efficiency, and Nitrogen Use Efficiency [QLF Agronomy. (2022). Soil health and nitrogen use efficiency study. RT6530, p.1] was accomplished at an independent research station near Martinsville, Illinois. QLF Agronomy Research compared a blend of 10% Liquid Carbon-Based Fertilizer L-CBF BOOST™ 4-0-3-2 S and 90% Urea Ammonium Nitrate [UAN 28%], as opposed to a full rate of UAN 28%.

    Six-inch depth soil samples were acquired in a grid pattern before pre-emerged [broadcast] and sidedress [Y-Drop @ V4-5] fertilizer applications were utilized. Samples were retaken two weeks after the broadcast and side-dress applications [e.g., post fertilizer applications], thus were evaluated to the first set of soil samples exercising Haney’s Soil Health Test Procedure.

    Plant growth and development depends on their ability to sequester all mineral nutrients from the soil. Plants often encounter considerable challenges in attaining an adequate quantity of these mineral nutrients to meet the requirements of cellular progressions due to their relative immobility. Nutrient deficiency can also lead to reduced overall soil biodiversity since plants serve as the manufacturers that support most food webs. The four charts below validate how ten percent L-CBF BOOST™ inclusion with UAN 28% improved nutrient availability for plant growth and development while providing the soil microbes with biodiversity. Each graph exhibits that all mineral nutrient listed, beyond N, has surpassed nutrient efficiency over the control treatment, thus proving that L-CBF products have the necessary tools to compete effectively in today’s high-demand agricultural sector.

    Graph 1
    Ten Percent L-CBF BOOST™ Inclusion With UAN 28%.
    Pre-Emerge [PPI] Application of 36+4 GPA Compared to 40 GPA of UAN 28%. Two Year
    Post Mean [2020-2021], Martinsville, Illinois. Soil Nutrient Improvement
    RT-6537 QLF AGRONOMY | 800-236-2345

    Graph 2
    Ten Percent L-CBF BOOST™ Inclusion With UAN 28%.
    Pre-Emerge [PPI] Application of 36+4 GPA Compared to 40 GPA of UAN 28%.
    Two Year Post Mean [2020-2021], Martinsville, Illinois.

    Graph 3
    Ten Percent L-CBF BOOST™ Inclusion With UAN 28%.
    Side-Dress [Y-Drop] Applications of 36+4 GPA Compared to 40 GPA of UAN 28%.
    Two Year Post Mean [2020-2021], Martinsville, Illinois.

    Graph 4
    Ten Percent L-CBF BOOST™ Inclusion With UAN 28%.
    Side-Dress [Y-Drop] Applications of 36+4 GPA Compared to 40 GPA of UAN 28%.
    Two Year Post Mean [2020-2021], Martinsville, Illinois

  • Transition Experiences Give Groundswell Guidance

    Transitioning to more regenerative regimes hasn’t been entirely plain sailing for three growers with very different soils and situations who shared their experiences at a packed Agrii Green Horizons seminar at this year’s Groundswell.

    All three no-till novices have found their journey over the past 6-8 years very positive and are increasingly profiting from moving less soil, protecting its surface, keeping roots in the ground and diversifying their cropping. While their goals are very similar, the way the growers have gone about achieving them reflect clear differences in the balance each has to strike between long-term sustainability gain and short term profitability need. On his mostly light 160ha at Hawkmill Farm just to the east of Cambridge, David White’s principal stakeholders are his family. This and his determination to‘ wean himself off the comfort blanket of cultivation as soon as possible’ led him to switch from full to no-till in a single, bold step in 2015.

    Since then, he has been experimenting at scale with a whole host of regenerative opportunities, including a vast range of cover cropping mixes and management methods; early drilling and a variety of OSR companion crops to combat cabbage stem flea beetle; and, most recently, bi-cropped beans and oats –both winter and spring. At Revesby Estate near Horncastle in Lincolnshire, farms manager Peter Cartwright has been moving more steadily but very deliberately towards no-till across the Wiggins-Davies family’s1100 cropped hectares since 2014.Getting the basics working correctly, keeping things simple at the start and building on carefully trialled experience with a firm goal in mind has been his recipe for success to meet the business’ need for parallel improvements in profitability and sustainability. 

    “We have been surprised at how quickly soil biology can start working much better when you look after it and encourage it to proliferate. Working with nature rather than trying to force the soil with big, heavy machines has seen our soil structure and health come on by leaps and bounds. “Amongst other things, both shallow working and deep burrowing earthworm numbers have built-up really rapidly. Keeping the land green the year round with catch and cover crops has been very useful in capturing nutrition. And drilling directly into them with the least possible soil disturbance has also helped capture carbon.

    “We are finding many ways to farm both more sustainably and profitably. The bi-crop of spring oats and spring beans we tried last year, for instance, performed handsomely with no in-crop herbicides, fungicides or fertiliser at all. The two species complemented each other extremely well, generating a much higher margin than the traditional beancrop we grew alongside it. “Higher seed rates and the right soil structure mean we are increasingly able to employ crop competition in place of herbicides to deal with weeds,” David added. “We need much less tractor horsepower these days, and work our tractors for around a quarter the time we used to. This means they last longer and we at least halve our diesel usage. “Our soils are far more resilient to both drought and heavy rainfall too. At the same time, the amount and diversity of wildlife we have on the farm these days is a joy to see.”

    Since moving from minimum tillage with rotational ploughing to almost entirely no-till cropping over the past eight years, Peter Cartwright has also seen huge improvements in the workability, resilience and health of soils with up to 40% clay and 40% silt at Revesby Farms. Over this time, he has almost halved diesel usage and substantially reduced labour needs while increasing average wheat yields by 1t/ha; not to mention getting to grips with horrendous blackgrass problems. “Our transition was actually prompted by the need to deal with levels of blackgrass that made some of our land almost uncroppable,” he explained. “Following the Stow Longa recipe, we introduced up to three consecutive years of spring cropping, concentrated on moving as little soil as possible at drilling and employed the most competitive wheat varieties at high seed rates drilled as late as possible in the autumn.

    “The rotational change led us to trial a range of cover cropping options and we now grow around 450ha of winter covers a year. We first ventured into direct drilling with a tined Horsch Sprinter, to which we have just added an Avatar drill now our soils are in good enough condition. We trialled the prototype Avatar back in 2016 and knew this would be ideal for our needs once we were in a position to make the most of its disc coulter system.”

    Two different types of direct drill these days gives the Revesby team the flexibility they need to deal with different soil conditions, trash levels and the weather. Over 90% of their crops are now drilled without cultivation, and the capacity to drill all their winter wheat in5-6 days reduces both their weather risk and need to travel when the conditions aren’t right. Alongside moving the least possible soil under the most favourable ground conditions, moving to their own version of Controlled Traffic Farming has made a big difference to the physical as well as biological health of their soils. “Everything is coming together so well now that I think we should be able to push our wheat yields up another 1t/ha over the coming four years,” suggested Peter Cartwright.

    “With hindsight, we should have been braver and cut down our cultivations sooner. And we certainly shouldn’t have invested in the Horsch Cruiser cultivator we have hardly needed to use since the day it arrived because our soil condition improved so much.. “Getting the basics of both drainage and black-grass management right before moving too wholeheartedly into no-till have been essential to our success. A shave been attention to detail, working towards a clear goal, and careful trialling under our own conditions in a scientific way as an Agrii Technology Centre.”

    Improving drainage and soil structure to enable the most successful direct drilling have been as important in the Fraser family’s transition from traditional plough and min till cropping to the regenerative regime they now employ on more than 80% of their farmed l and. They are also being able to successfully extend this experience to their contracting operations to provide the resource and experience needed to help more West Country growers benefit from soil-first management. “We have found digging soil pits everywhere to assess soil condition and carefully targeted low disturbance subsoiling and mole-ploughing to sort out any inadequacies a crucial first step,” George Fraser stressed. “With our agronomist, we also plan everything on the basis of full soil testing, repeated every four years to monitor changes.

    “We really benefit from being large enough to run several different types– including a Weaving GD, Amazone Cayena and Weaving Sabre Tine – so we can match the kit we use closely to soil needs and condition. The substantial slurry, muck and digestate service that is part of our family business has been great fit with our organic matter-building focus too. “Contract farming means we can’t afford to be evangelical about our system. So, where ground needs subsoiling it gets it; where trash causes slug problems we stubble rake; and everything we put into our cover crops is there for a particular economic as well as environmental reason. “Like David and Peter, we have seen great improvements in the health, vitality and workability of our soils in a relatively short time without compromising crop performance,” he reported.

    “Wider rotations are giving us more flexibility to adapt to conditions as well as greater biodiversity. Cover crops are helping condition soils and build organic matter while providing late-season wildlife food and shelter. And better plant health through healthier soils and more balanced nutrition is taking the pressure off sprays programmes at just the time we need it with the loss of so much chemistry. “Moving to no-till is far from a panacea and it’s all too easy to make mistakes; especially where them likes of bromeas well as blackgrass are problematic. But we have no doubt that integrating the most appropriate regenerative techniques into our business with attention to detail and the best-informed advice has to be the way ahead.”

  • Transition Experiences Give Groundswell Guidance

    Transitioning to more regenerative regimes hasn’t been entirely plain sailing for three growers with very different soils and situations who shared their experiences at a packed Agrii Green Horizons seminar at this year’s Groundswell.

    However, they have all found their journey over the past 6-8 years very positive and are increasingly profiting from moving less soil, protecting its surface, keeping roots in the ground and diversifying their cropping.

    While their goals are very similar, the way the growers have gone about achieving them reflect clear differences in the balance each has to strike between long-term sustainability gain and short-term profitability need.

    On his mostly light 160ha at Hawkmill Farm just to the east of Cambridge, David White’s principal stakeholders are his family. This and his determination to ‘wean himself off the comfort blanket of cultivation as soon as possible’ led him to switch from full to no-till in a single, bold step in 2015.

    Since then, he has been experimenting at scale with a whole host of regenerative opportunities, including a vast range of cover cropping mixes and management methods; early drilling and a variety of OSR companion crops to combat cabbage stem flea beetle; and, most recently, bi-cropped beans and oats – both winter and spring.

    At Revesby Estate near Horncastle in Lincolnshire, farms manager Peter Cartwright has been moving more steadily but very deliberately towards no-till across the Wiggins-Davies family’s 1100 cropped hectares since 2014.

    Getting the basics working correctly, keeping things simple at the start and building on carefully trialled experience with a firm goal in mind has been his recipe for success to meet the business’ need for parallel improvements in profitability and sustainability.

    Farming around 1000ha under a variety of agreements across a vast range of soil types, George Fraser of Shaftesbury-based farming and contracting business, A&R Fraser has had to be even more cautious in his regenerative transition. 

    Six years ago, he and his family started developing their well-established business to be the no-till contract farmer and contractor of choice in the North Dorset/south Wiltshire area. With short-term performance at least as important as long-term improvement to their customers, they have done this by perfecting their approach on their own land before extending it more widely in the most appropriate ways.

    “In stepping up our soil biology to reduce our reliance on inputs our shoulders have had to be broad enough to take a good amount of criticism for farming ugly,” said David White.  “We have made our fair share of mistakes along the way. Not least by failing to follow the biological rules and trying to do the same thing twice – like growing wheat after wheat.

    “We have been surprised at how quickly soil biology can start working much better when you look after it and encourage it to proliferate. Working with nature rather than trying to force the soil with big, heavy machines has seen our soil structure and health come on by leaps and bounds.

    “Amongst other things, both shallow working and deep burrowing earthworm numbers have built-up really rapidly. Keeping the land green the year round with catch and cover crops has been very useful in capturing nutrition. And drilling directly into them with the least possible soil disturbance has also helped capture carbon.

    “We are finding many ways to farm both more sustainably and profitably. The bi-crop of spring oats and spring beans we tried last year, for instance, performed handsomely with no in-crop herbicides, fungicides or fertiliser at all. The two species complemented each other extremely well, generating a much higher margin than the traditional bean crop we grew alongside it.

    “Higher seed rates and the right soil structure mean we are increasingly able to employ crop competition in place of herbicides to deal with weeds,” David added. “We need much less tractor horsepower these days, and work our tractors for around a quarter the time we used to. This means they last longer and we at least halve our diesel usage.

    “Our soils are far more resilient to both drought and heavy rainfall too. At the same time, the amount and diversity of wildlife we have on the farm these days is a joy to see.”

    Since moving from minimum tillage with rotational ploughing to almost entirely no-till cropping over the past eight years, Peter Cartwright has also seen huge improvements in the workability, resilience and health of soils with up to 40% clay and 40% silt at Revesby Farms.

    Over this time, he has almost halved diesel usage and substantially reduced labour needs while increasing average wheat yields by 1t/ha; not to mention getting to grips with horrendous blackgrass problems.

    “Our transition was actually prompted by the need to deal with levels of blackgrass that made some of our land almost uncroppable,” he explained. “Following the Stow Longa recipe, we introduced up to three consecutive years of spring cropping, concentrated on moving as little soil as possible at drilling and employed the most competitive wheat varieties at high seed rates drilled as late as possible in the autumn.

    “The rotational change led us to trial a range of cover cropping options and we now grow around 450ha of winter covers a year. We first ventured into direct drilling with a tined Horsch Sprinter, to which we have just added an Avatar drill now our soils are in good enough condition. We trialled the prototype Avatar back in 2016 and knew this would be ideal for our needs once we were in a position to make the most of its disc coulter system.”

    Two different types of direct drill these days gives the Revesby team the flexibility they need to deal with different soil conditions, trash levels and the weather. Over 90% of their crops are now drilled without cultivation, and the capacity to drill all their winter wheat in 5-6 days reduces both their weather risk and need to travel when the conditions aren’t right.

    Alongside moving the least possible soil under the most favourable ground conditions, moving to their own version of Controlled Traffic Farming has made a big difference to the physical as well as biological health of their soils.

    “Everything is coming together so well now that I think we should be able to push our wheat yields up another 1t/ha over the coming four years,” suggested Peter Cartwright.

    “With hindsight, we should have been braver and cut down our cultivations sooner. And we certainly shouldn’t have invested in the Horsch Cruiser cultivator we have hardly needed to use since the day it arrived because our soil condition improved so much..

    “Getting the basics of both drainage and black-grass management right before moving too wholeheartedly into no-till have been essential to our success. As have been attention to detail, working towards a clear goal, and careful trialling under our own conditions in a scientific way as an Agrii Technology Centre.”

    Improving drainage and soil structure to enable the most successful direct drilling have been as important in the Fraser family’s transition from traditional plough and min till cropping to the regenerative regime they now employ on more than 80% of their farmed land.

    They are also being able to successfully extend this experience to their contracting operations to provide the resource and experience needed to help more West Country growers benefit from soil-first management.

    “We have found digging soil pits everywhere to assess soil condition and carefully targeted low disturbance subsoiling and mole-ploughing to sort out any inadequacies a crucial first step,” George Fraser stressed. “With our agronomist, we also plan everything on the basis of full soil testing, repeated every four years to monitor changes.

    “We really benefit from being large enough to run several different types – including a Weaving GD, Amazone Cayena and Weaving Sabre Tine – so we can match the kit we use closely to soil needs and condition. The substantial slurry, muck and digestate service that is part of our family business has been great fit with our organic matter-building focus too.

    “Contract farming means we can’t afford to be evangelical about our system. So, where ground needs subsoiling it gets it; where trash causes slug problems we stubble rake; and everything we put into our cover crops is there for a particular economic as well as environmental reason.

    “Like David and Peter, we have seen great improvements in the health, vitality and workability of our soils in a relatively short time without compromising crop performance,” he reported.

    “Wider rotations are giving us more flexibility to adapt to conditions as well as greater biodiversity. Cover crops are helping condition soils and build organic matter while providing late-season wildlife food and shelter. And better plant health through healthier soils and more balanced nutrition is taking the pressure off sprays programmes at just the time we need it with the loss of so much chemistry.

    “Moving to no-till is far from a panacea and it’s all too easy to make mistakes; especially where them likes of brome as well as blackgrass are problematic.  But we have no doubt that integrating the most appropriate regenerative techniques into our business with attention to detail and the best-informed advice has to be the way ahead.”

  • Environmental Impact Of 57,000 Multi Ingredient Processed Foods Revealed

    This paper suggests a new way of assessing the environmental impacts of supermarket food. Plant-based foods have the lowest environmental impacts. More nutritious foods are often more sustainable
    By University of Oxford News Team

    The paper compares the environmental impacts of meat and meat alternative products, such as plant-based sausages or burgers, and finds many meat alternatives had a fifth to less than a tenth of the environmental impact of meat-based equivalents. This is the first time a transparent and reproducible method has been developed to assess the environmental impacts of multi-ingredient products. It provides a first step towards enabling consumers, retailers, and policymakers to make informed decisions on the environmental impacts of food and drink products. Lead author, Dr Michael Clark says, ‘By estimating the environmental impact of food and drink products in a standardised way, we have taken a significant first step towards providing information that could enable informed decision-making. We still need to find how best effectively to communicate this information, in order to shift behaviour towards more sustainable outcomes, but assessing the impact of products is an important step forward.’

    “By estimating the environmental impact of food and drink products…we have taken a significant first step towards providing information that could enable informed decision making”

    Dr Michael Clarke

    A study by the Food Standards Agency* shows more than half of UK consumers want to make more sustainable decisions on the environmental impacts of foods and, at the same time, food corporations are setting ambitious net zero greenhouse gas targets. But there is a lack of detailed environmental impact information on food and drink products – which would allow consumers and corporations to make more sustainable choices. The study, led by researchers in Oxford’s Livestock, Environment and People (LEAP) programme and Oxford Population Health used publicly available information to derive estimates of the environmental impact of 57,000 food products, which make up the majority of foods and drinks for sale in UK supermarkets. They looked at greenhouse gas emissions, land use, water stress, and eutrophication potential — when bodies of water become enriched with nutrients, often causing harmful algal blooms and ultimately killing other life. For the purposes of analysis, visualisation and communication, the team combined these four scores into a single estimated composite environmental impact score per 100g of product.

    Professor Peter Scarborough, Oxford Professor of Population Health, says, ‘This work is very exciting. For the first time, we have a transparent and comparable method for assessing the environmental footprint of multi-ingredient processed foods. These types of foods make up most of the supermarket shopping we do, but until now there was no way of directly comparing their impact on the environment. ‘This work could support tools that help consumers make more environmentally sustainable food purchasing decisions. More importantly, it could prompt retailers and food manufacturers to reduce the environmental impact of the food supply thereby making it easier for all of us to have healthier, more sustainable diets.

    “This work is very exciting. For the first time, we have a transparent and comparable method for assessing the environmental footprint of multi-ingredient processed foods….most of the supermarket shopping we do”

    Professor Peter Scarborough

    The researchers quantify the differences in environmental impact between multi-ingredient products and find those made of fruits, vegetables, sugar, and flour, such as soups, salads, bread and many breakfast cereals, have low impact scores, and those made of meat, fish and cheese, are at the high end of the scale. Jerky, biltong, and other dried beef products, which typically have more than 100g of fresh meat per 100g of final product, often have the highest environmental impact. When looking at specific types of food products, such as meat and their alternatives, lasagne, cookies and biscuits, and pesto sauces, the researchers found large variation within these types of foods. For these food types, lower-impact products often had one half to one tenth the environmental impact of higher-impact products. This type of information, if communicated to consumers and retailers, may help shift behaviours towards more sustainable foods without requiring large changes in dietary behaviour, such as swapping beef for beans.

    When comparing the environmental impact score to their nutritional value, as defined by the Nutri-score method, products that were more sustainable tended to be more nutritious, including meat and meat alternatives. There are exceptions to this trend, such as sugary beverages, which have a low environmental impact but also score poorly for nutritional quality. Jennie Macdiarmid, Professor of Sustainable Nutrition and Health at the the Rowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, says, ‘An important aspect of the study was linking the environmental impacts of composite foods with the nutritional quality, showing some of the synergies and trade-offs between different parameters. Using this new method manufacturers can reduce the environmental impact, while ensuring a high nutritional quality of products.’

    “Using this new method manufacturers can reduce the environmental impact, while ensuring a high nutritional quality of products”

    Professor Jennie Macdiarmid

    The amount of every ingredient in a multi-ingredient food or drink product is usually known only to the manufacturer, but in the UK they are legally obliged to provide percentage values for certain ingredients, and ingredients are listed on packaging in order of size. Dr Clark and colleagues used known percentages and order of ingredients to infer unknown values, cross-referencing products and ingredients through use of a large dataset of products. Individual ingredients were mapped to environmental databases, and the percentages of all ingredients within each product were used to estimate the impact of each whole product. The analysis makes use of food DB – a Big Data research platform at Oxford, which collects and processes data daily on all food and drink products available in 12 online supermarkets in the UK and Ireland, and a comprehensive review of 570 studies of the environmental impact of food production, including data from 38,000 farms in 119 countries.

    A limitation of the analysis is that information on ingredient sourcing, such as country of origin or agricultural production method, is lacking from ingredient lists and this would help increase accuracy of the environmental impact estimates. Additionally, as portion sizes vary for different products, there remain uncertainties in the total environmental impacts of products.

    “Our method fills an information gap on the environmental impacts of multi-ingredient foods”

    Dr Richie Harrington

    Dr Richie Harrington, head of food DB, says, ‘Our method fills an information gap on the environmental impacts of multi ingredient foods. The algorithms we developed can estimate the percentage contribution of each individual ingredient within a product and match those ingredients to existing environmental impact databases. Applying this methodology to generate impact scores for large numbers of products, we illustrated how this can be used to derive quantifiable insight on the sustainability of those products, and their relationship to their nutritional quality.’

  • Farmer Focus – Phil Rowbottom

    The build up to harvest is always mixed with a bit oftrepidation and excitement, this year was no exception,Harvest 2022 was our first harvest following direct drillingwith the Opico Sky Easy Drill.

    After the hard work and cost of growing a crop, there’s always a bit of uncertainty of how successful it will be, irrespective of just how well you think the crops have looked throughout the growing season. Despite the record high temperatures and dry spring, I have to say the Oil Seed Rape and wheats have looked well all year. Harvest was looking to be the earliest ever experienced, just as we prepared to start on the 21st of July, it rained and did so for a further 8 days! We’ve not run a combine here for around 30 years, I’ve used a contractor ever since, for just over 300 acres it’s not cost effective. Our light sandy soils have never broken records, but this years OSR has been the highest yielding rape crop we’ve ever managed, given the conditions this season and low establishment and inputs I’m over the moon with 1.7t/ acre. It’s difficult to conclude how or why, all I can suggest is that it had a good start into a moist seed bed last year, had little or no evidence of flee beetle and has looked like a good crop all year.

    We pretty much rolled straight into the wheat, progress was slightly hampered by a minor fire on the combine, fortunately no major damage, but parts availability slowed the repair down. Wheat yields were effected by the excessive heat, with Skyfall yielding 3.5 t/acre and Skyscraper producing 3.4.Although a delayed start from planned, harvest seemed to be over in a very short space of time, dare I say very easy, probably some of the best harvesting conditions we’ve ever experienced, our small cooperative grain store facility was soon filled with some ease this year.

    Thoughts very quickly turned to cover crop establishment and trying the 7.5M Mizuri Rezult stubble rake, it’s been a bit of an experiment this year, running costs are extremely low and at 12-15kph you can cover the ground very quickly Initial impressions of the rake have been encouraging, we chop all the straw on the farm, it helps with organic matter build up and with the cost of fertiliser it’s worth more to me than baling and selling it off, only slight issue is the combines chopper and chaff spreader don’t spread the full header width, leaving a gap between the mats of straw.

    Running the rake at a slight angle to the tramlines, seems to have moved the straw enough to even this out, it also seems to have encouraged a ‘chit’ by slightly scratching the soil surface and mixing the straw, grains and soil. The OSR stubble was very dry and brittle this year, the rake also seemed to break it up to some degree. Compared to other parts of the country we’d had around25-30 mm of rain, the chopped straw helped to retain some of that valuable moisture. 40 ha drilled before 2nd wheats. I even drilled some of it in the rain, something you couldn’t do onto ploughing or heavily cultivated ground.

    Cover crop mix and sowing rates

    Radish . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3kg/ha

    Common vetch . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14kg/ha

    Phacelia . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2.25kg/ha

    Clover . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3kg/ha

    Linseed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.75kg/ha

    Buckwheat . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12kg/ha

    2023 Anatasia oil seed rape drilling @ 4.5kg/ha and slug pellets at 4.5 kg/ha was completed on the 31st of August, into pretty ideal conditions. The plan will be similar to last year, as low input as we can get away with, mindful of increasing costs. The biggest saving to date is fuel, between 4.5 – 5.5 l/ha on the drill depending on the field, somewhere in the region of two thirds less fuel use from our old system. The plan is to have drilled 1st wheats by the 1st of October weather permitting, into cover crops.

    Single pass establishment with the Sky Drill has changed the way we farm, not only in the input costs, but in time, our old plough based system, was a slow, costly process, it works with our system and other business interests, it’s also beginning to gain some interest locally and the acreage I’m contract drilling will increase this autumn. Direct Drilling not only reduces the time spent drilling, it allows for choosing the optimal timing for going drilling. Harvest 2022 has been one of the easiest in memory, the weather has had an impact in that, the drill is also a major factor, if this is what the future looks like, then so far, I’m convinced.

  • Environmental impact of 57,000 multi-ingredient processed foods revealed

    This paper suggests a new way of assessing the environmental impacts of supermarket food. Plant-based foods have the lowest environmental impactsMore nutritious foods are often more sustainable

    By University of Oxford News Team

    A study estimating the environmental impact of 57,000 food products in the UK and Ireland has been published by an Oxford-led research team in the journal PNAS 

    The paper compares the environmental impacts of meat and meat alternative products, such as plant-based sausages or burgers, and finds many meat alternatives had a fifth to less than a tenth of the environmental impact of meat-based equivalents.

    This is the first time a transparent and reproducible method has been developed to assess the environmental impacts of multi-ingredient products. It provides a first step towards enabling consumers, retailers, and policymakers to make informed decisions on the environmental impacts of food and drink products.

    Lead author, Dr Michael Clark says, ‘By estimating the environmental impact of food and drink products in a standardised way, we have taken a significant first step towards providing information that could enable informed decision-making. We still need to find how best effectively to communicate this information, in order to shift behaviour towards more sustainable outcomes, but assessing the impact of products is an important step forward.’

    “By estimating the environmental impact of food and drink products…we have taken a significant first step towards providing information that could enable informed decision-making”

    Dr Michael Clarke

    A study by the Food Standards Agency* shows more than half of UK consumers want to make more sustainable decisions on the environmental impacts of foods and, at the same time, food corporations are setting ambitious net zero greenhouse gas targets. But there is a lack of detailed environmental impact information on food and drink products – which would allow consumers and corporations to make more sustainable choices.

    The study, led by researchers in Oxford’s Livestock, Environment and People (LEAP) programme and Oxford Population Health used publicly available information to derive estimates of the environmental impact of 57,000 food products, which make up the majority of foods and drinks for sale in UK supermarkets.

    They looked at greenhouse gas emissions, land use, water stress, and eutrophication potential — when bodies of water become enriched with nutrients, often causing harmful algal blooms and ultimately killing other life. For the purposes of analysis, visualisation and communication, the team combined these four scores into a single estimated composite environmental impact score per 100g of product.

    Professor Peter Scarborough, Oxford Professor of Population Health, says, ‘This work is very exciting. For the first time, we have a transparent and comparable method for assessing the environmental footprint of multi-ingredient processed foods. These types of foods make up most of the supermarket shopping we do, but until now there was no way of directly comparing their impact on the environment.

    ‘This work could support tools that help consumers make more environmentally sustainable food purchasing decisions. More importantly, it could prompt retailers and food manufacturers to reduce the environmental impact of the food supply thereby making it easier for all of us to have healthier, more sustainable diets.’

    “This work is very exciting. For the first time, we have a transparent and comparable method for assessing the environmental footprint of multi-ingredient processed foods….most of the supermarket shopping we do”

    Professor Peter Scarborough

    The researchers quantify the differences in environmental impact between multi-ingredient products and find those made of fruits, vegetables, sugar, and flour, such as soups, salads, bread and many breakfast cereals, have low impact scores, and those made of meat, fish and cheese, are at the high end of the scale. Jerky, biltong, and other dried beef products, which typically have more than 100g of fresh meat per 100g of final product, often have the highest environmental impact.

    When looking at specific types of food products, such as meat and their alternatives, lasagne, cookies and biscuits, and pesto sauces, the researchers found large variation within these types of foods. For these food types, lower-impact products often had one half to one tenth the environmental impact of higher-impact products. This type of information, if communicated to consumers and retailers, may help shift behaviours towards more sustainable foods without requiring large changes in dietary behaviour, such as swapping beef for beans.

    When comparing the environmental impact score to their nutritional value, as defined by the Nutri-score method, products that were more sustainable tended to be more nutritious, including meat and meat alternatives. There are exceptions to this trend, such as sugary beverages, which have a low environmental impact but also score poorly for nutritional quality.

    Jennie Macdiarmid, Professor of Sustainable Nutrition and Health at the the Rowett Institute, University of Aberdeen, says, ‘An important aspect of the study was linking the environmental impacts of composite foods with the nutritional quality, showing some of the synergies and trade-offs between different parameters. Using this new method manufacturers can reduce the environmental impact, while ensuring a high nutritional quality of products.’

    “Using this new method manufacturers can reduce the environmental impact, while ensuring a high nutritional quality of products”

    Professor Jennie Macdiarmid

    The amount of every ingredient in a multi-ingredient food or drink product is usually known only to the manufacturer, but in the UK they are legally obliged to provide percentage values for certain ingredients, and ingredients are listed on packaging in order of size. Dr Clark and colleagues used known percentages and order of ingredients to infer unknown values, cross-referencing products and ingredients through use of a large dataset of products. Individual ingredients were mapped to environmental databases, and the percentages of all ingredients within each product were used to estimate the impact of each whole product.

    The analysis makes use of foodDB – a Big Data research platform at Oxford, which collects and processes data daily on all food and drink products available in 12 online supermarkets in the UK and Ireland, and a comprehensive review of 570 studies of the environmental impact of food production, including data from 38,000 farms in 119 countries.

    A limitation of the analysis is that information on ingredient sourcing, such as country of origin or agricultural production method, is lacking from ingredient lists and this would help increase accuracy of the environmental impact estimates. Additionally, as portion sizes vary for different products, there remain uncertainties in the total environmental impacts of products.

    “Our method fills an information gap on the environmental impacts of multi-ingredient foods”

    Dr Richie Harrington

    Dr Richie Harrington, head of foodDB, says, ‘Our method fills an information gap on the environmental impacts of multi-ingredient foods. The algorithms we developed can estimate the percentage contribution of each individual ingredient within a product and match those ingredients to existing environmental impact databases. Applying this methodology to generate impact scores for large numbers of products, we illustrated how this can be used to derive quantifiable insight on the sustainability of those products, and their relationship to their nutritional quality.’

    One Industry Response to Eco-labelling

    Here’s Phil Bicknell, Head of Business Development at CIEL, and his take on eco-labelling…

    Recent work to estimate the composition of 10,000s of food and drink products has been in the news this week. As the coverage has flagged, the analysis has its limit and references lack of information on country of origin or agricultural production method. I’ll admit that I’ve only skimmed the headlines and the full paper is top of my reading list. However, that point about the work’s limitations feels something of an understatement to me.

    Anyone who has looked in detail at the emissions and broader sustainability issues associated with livestock production systems will know the significant variation between countries, between product types, and between systems. The reality is that beef produced in the UK has half the GHG impact of the global average, for example. The bottom line is that broad assumptions and estimates don’t necessarily move us further forward when we are dealing with very technical and very complex issues.

    On the surface, the work has generated some eye-raising results. How can sugar-coated cereals and fizzy drinks be better for us than nutrient-rich, locally produced meat? We know meat, eggs and dairy are naturally highly nutritious sources of protein, which many of the foods with higher ratings in this report are not. There seems to be a gap when looking at the issue of nutrient quality, using one single figure to describe very different foods. It strikes me that meat or dairy products can provide more of the nutrients needed in a healthy diet than many of the foods listed.

    Another gap is the continually evolving nature of agricultural production. I have no doubt that a greater focus is being given to the important role livestock play in efficient, circular food systems across UK agriculture. Whether it’s the re-introduction of livestock to arable cropping systems or the re-assessment of the value of nutrients in farm waste, the livestock industry is not standing still. And all of the above is before we get into the challenges of assessing biodiversity.

    I understand that companies are keen to shout about their environmental credentials, but I can’t help feeling that work like this has the potential to add to the confusion for shoppers. More importantly, it has the potential to do a disservice to some positive steps being taken in the UK by the food industry and by farmers.

    Let us know your thoughts on The Farming Forum…

  • Straw Management For Successful Direct Drilling

    Martin Lole of Springfield Farm and Mzuri, reflects on drilling into stubble and his recipe for successful
    straw management.

    As farming systems become more productive, arable enterprises are faced with increasing levels of straw to manage post-harvest. For many this provides a valuable secondary income source when baled, but for others, whether through environmental objectives or simply not having the demand for it, straw management forms part of the preparation for next year’s crop. Some growers may see leaving straw in the field as a luxury or perhaps a nuisance depending on their system, but when managed well, there are a number of advantages with wide ranging benefits from soil health to better establishment.

    Advantages of drilling into
    stubble:

    • Provides nutrition for soil microorganisms, supporting healthy populations

    • Increases soil organic matter

    • Reduces risk of wind and water erosion by protecting with a straw thatch the upmost field surface from harsh weather

    • Supports good soil structure and promotes better machinery travel

    • In dry seasons, stubble can help to preserve moisture by retaining it in the soil

    Talking predominantly about direct establishment systems, drilling into stubble can be a very effective and efficient way to establish a range of crops, but success in doing so can depend on several key management factors which are important to consider before heading in with the drill.

    1. Assess your straw

    “You’ve had a bumper harvest and with that comes a bumper crop of straw. You recognise the benefits of leaving the straw on the surface but what next? ”The most important factor relating to successful direct drilling into straw is ensuring an even spread and a chopped to a consistent length. By far the easiest and most cost-effective way to achieve this is to start with the combine. Watching to see if straw is chopped and distributed evenly will highlight whether the combine is operating as it should, or whether further preparation is required prior to drilling.

    Uneven straw distribution will cause problems with variable germination and can cause drills to block if not managed correctly, something which can cause unnecessary downtime and frustration. This leads onto considering what type of drill will be used and what the operator wants to achieve by drilling into stubble. For farmers wanting to drill into a lot of surface residue, strip tillage has the advantage with wide row spacing and sufficient clearance for trash flow, something which the Pro-Til range has been specifically designed for. For those growers who still want to drill into stubble but want a hybrid system that gives a more conventional row spacing, covering large areas quickly, good straw management is particularly important. The iPass sits in this category, offering conventional row spacings into stubble, min till or cultivated land whilst maintaining high forward speed and accurate seeding which makes the iPass range a versatile solution for a range of drilling situations.

    2. Manage uneven straw

    “Your combine wasn’t what it was and refuses to chop and spread straw consistently, what now? ”For effective drilling, chopped straw should be short in length and evenly spread across the field. This not only provides a smooth canvas for direct drills to operate in, but it also starts the process of decomposition and returning those nutrients back into the soil. There are a number of methods of pre-drilling field preparation that can be used to manage uneven straw levels including raking with a stubble rake such as the Mzuri Rezult. Fitted with discs and five banks of stiff tines, a pass of this surface cultivator can help to chop surface straw, spread it evenly across the field and also generate a small level of tilth mixing it with the straw to aid decomposition. 

    For growers who want to maximise the incorporation of chopped straw with the top layer of soil, there are various surface cultivators for example the Vaderstad carrier which will produce more tilth than a stubble rake, but will leave a very even finish of mixed soil and straw –accelerating straw decomposition which can be an ideal canvas to drill into with a direct drill, particularly if there is a large amount of surface straw to deal with.

    Not only does lightly incorporating the straw prepare the field for drilling, but it can also act as an important step in minimising slug and weed pressures for the next crop. The Mzuri Rezult rake can be used in the heat of the day post combining of OSR stubbles to disrupt slug habitats and expose slug eggs to the midday sun reducing slug pressure for the following crop. Raking can also encourage volunteers and weed seeds to chit by mixing them with a slight tilth which creates a stale seed bed that can either be harrowed again for cultural control or receive chemistry both providing a blank canvas ahead of drilling.

    3. Success with straw

    “You’ve taken the time to assess your straw and carried out light surface cultivation in fields that need it, giving the direct drill operator the perfect recipe for success. ”When managed effectively, working with surface straw can yield great benefits over traditional establishment methods. Not only does it provide a weatherproof finish which helps mitigate erosion and run off in high rainfall, it can also provide a sheltered microclimate for young seedlings when drilled between stubble rows. Stubble acts as a mulch to preserve soil moisture and prevent it drying out in dry seasons, reducing stress to the crop and protecting long term soil structure. All of which benefits crop growth throughout the season and ensures a stable, consistent environment to direct drill into. Some direct drills may require more stubble preparation than others depending on what the operator is  trying to achieve. 

    The Takeaway Message

    Not all stubble is created equal. Low volume stubbles such as Rape, Bean sand wheat straw that has been baled are all very straightforward for the majority of single pass drills. However, larger volumes of straw on the surface can cause challenges particularly for drills with close row spacings or low frames with little clearance. When combined with heavy soils, these scenarios can prove even more challenging and effect the success of the establishment. There are however a few important steps that we can take to balance the benefits of drilling into stubble with the need for effective seeding. Straw raking or light discing is always going to be a helpful tool when dealing with high volumes of surface straw, as is also avoiding drilling into heavy soils when wet. It is also important to consider the drill being used and its clearance, stagger and row spacing. But perhaps the most important thing to take away, is the importance of starting straw management with the combine. It is essential to ensure a short stubble length and if not baled a well chopped spread of straw to give the best canvas ahead of drilling.