Back Issues

If you would like a printed copy of any of our back issues, then they can be purchased on Farm Marketplace. You can also download the PDFs or read online from links below.

  • How To Start Drilling For £8K

    Clive Bailye’s seed drill of choice is his 6m John Deere 750A , which has been used exclusively for 3-4 seasons. Last year, with an increased acreage, the founder and publisher of this Direct Driller magazine thought a second seed drill was necessary. Having just the one machine was a risk and in a difficult season would mean drilling was delayed. He looked around and found a good condition Horsch CO6 tine drill advertised in Germany.

    Words and pictures by Mike Donovan

    upload_2018-4-7_16-39-39.png

    After delivery he rebuilt the coulters to a narrow profile so as to reduce soil disturbance. He says the tine drill is very useful driling after straw crops such as osr and also through the straw on second crop cereals.

    Buying the drill from a German farmer was not particularly complicated, and provided him with a higher spec machine than Horsh sell in the UK. The seed dart tyres are much wider, and the machine is fitted with blockage monitors as well as full width front packers and also a liquid fert application system.

    A sheaf of photos were taken, and Clive then asked for some of specific parts to show wear. The deal was done at under £5,000 which Clive says is the market value of these machines which are too large for small farmers to buy. Original owners like to buy new and sell when the machine is still in good condition.

    Narrow tines with wear tiles

    @Clive knew he wanted to make changes, substituting the Horsch tines and coulters for something far narrower, and has ended up getting his own design of tine made, which has a wear tile made from Ferobide, far harder than tungsten. The drill is on the farm primarily for osr and 2nd crop cereals drilled into chopped straw and the 25cm spacing is okay for these crops.

    Comments on Clive’s on-line forum, TFF, said the drill many not be so good with beans, as the slot is a mere 12mm wide. And in barley the spacing may well be too wide as it needs to be thick. Clive points out that the seed pipe can actually be a bit wider than 12mm as it is in the shadow of the point. It would be good to have the option of using it for beans.

    upload_2018-4-7_16-42-6.png

    Above left: The cheap CO6 is being calibrated ready for its first outing

    upload_2018-4-7_16-42-44.png

    Above right: The adapted Horsch is being filled by the home built drill logistics trailer with seed and liquid starter fert.

    Getting around the German instructions

    The Horsch came, of course, with a control box and instructions in German. More on-line discussion revealed that English instructions were available on the Horsch website, and another explained that Horsch was sourcing some of these parts from Agton in Canada anyway. Zealman from New Zealand explained that the button marked with callipers should be held down for around 5 seconds. The menu is where you adjust the tramline sequence, valve layout and row numbers.

    upload_2018-4-7_16-44-45.png

    Ball hitch is a continental standard and provides a positive connection between tractor and drill

    upload_2018-4-7_16-45-16.png

    The Stocks Wizard has a rotor modified for Avadex which otherwise leaks everywhere

    A Stocks Wizard is on the back of the drill and used for Avadex. Here again the knowledge of actual farmers is helpful. Alistair Nelson warned that the rotor and the surrounding shroud need to be changed, and he got good advice “from Rick at Stocks”. Clive has the same setup on the 750A and says that the Avadex leaks everywhere unless the modification is made. The drill was acquired and modified in 2016 and the results have been excellent.

    The machine went through the residue without many problems and having the second drill has meant more timely planting. Clive has shown that moving into No-Till is not the expensive exercise so many farmers think it might be. The total cost, after modifications which included replacing all tines and coulters, was under £8,000.

    Author Mike Donovan writes: we have featured a number of home made direct drills in @Practical Farm Ideas, and are always interested in seeing more. Please contact mike editor@farmideas.co.uk or 07778877514.

  • Products In Focus…

    BTTUK – ONE YEAR ON!

    Starting a new venture at anytime can be challenging, add that to being in the middle of a global pandemic and some people would say that we needed our heads looking at!

    However, we had a number of key, unique and innovative elements in our business plan that helped us to swing the decision into the starting up of BTT UK Limited a subsidiary of Bourgault Tillage Tools in Canada. Bourgault Tillage Tools (BTT) had been active in the UK for many years through an importer, but it had by no means reached full potential and something had to be done to realise this. Bourgault Tillage Tools based in Saskatchewan, Canada identified UK Agriculture as a changing market with changes in climate and farming practices like the move towards very low disturbance and soil moisture conservation.

    Issues that have been around for many years in Canada and Australia Stuart Aldworth (Technical Manager) explains that BTT have been developing and manufacturing a vast range of quality, proven and innovative wearing part products for many years supplying a global market and therefore have a proven track record in solutions to deal with these changes. This along with a significant investment commitment by BTT Canada to UK agriculture in a significant stock holding in our base near Peterborough, all combined with an unrivalled breadth of product and system knowledge from the UK based team have certainly given BTT UK Ltd the best possible foundations to work from.

    One year on and BTT UK has had a steady and solid start. The increased stock holding over the year has led to all customers receiving exactly what they required quickly and efficiently. 93% of all parcels sent out are arriving with customers the next day and 100% of pallet orders have been received within 3 days, many within 2 days. For the very occasional emergency order taken on the phone at 2pm on a show stand in Norfolk we managed to get to the warehouse in Peterborough and then onto farm in Winchester by 8pm that night enabling drilling to continue through the night. Ian Clayton-Bailey (Managing Director) explains that the can-do / will-do philosophy of BTT UK is one of the key elements to success. Service is everything in agriculture, farmers do not stop at 4.30pm on a Friday to till 8.30am on a Monday so why should we. Companies that are not prepared to offer this level of service to our industry are on borrowed time.

    What our customers are saying about us

    I have been successfully using Bourgault VOS openers on my 6m Horsch Sprinter for 5 years. The technical support and backup has always been good for that period but now BTT have started trading in its own right in the UK it has gone to a new level, a very positive move as it has brought a dedicated manufacturing company its support and product stocking along with the continuation of key people direct to farmer users in the UK.

    Tim Hayward – South Fawley Farm

    “I’ve used BTTUK since they set up. The level of stock, speed of dispatch and competitive price is second to none. All backed up by the knowledgeable & enthusiastic team of Stuart & Ian, it’s always a pleasure to deal & meet with them”

    Farmer – Geoff Simms, St Albans

    VOS (Versatile Opener System) – THE NEXT 12 MONTHS

    The success of the Bourgault VOS (Versatile Opener System) mainly associated with the Horsch Sprinters and CO’s has led to many conversations over the past year about can the VOS seeding coulters be used on other drills? The simple answer is yes, with an adapter or in some cases a complete new leg. Also, more farmers seem to be now doing what Clive Bailye did some years ago with his ‘Pimp MY Drill’ project and developing their own seeding drill to meet their own requirement. BTT can help this process by supplying the complete leg and seeding coulter system to be bolted onto an existing frame and hopper unit.

    Clive Bailye TWB Farms

    “ We were looking for a cost effective backup drill to our main drill, which allowed us to establish our crops quickly and cheaply, our Horsch CO6 has been heavily modified since we bought it in 2016. Having tried various different coulters in that time, we switched to the Bourgault Paired row opener 688-HLD-2080 holders with 610-TIP-0802 tips in 2019. We have been extremely happy with how they have out-performed all of the previous openers on their wear rate alone. Ian and Stuart are incredibly knowledgeable and offer unbiased advice on the best options for your machinery, looking forward to our next workshop project already!”

    SPEED-LOC – Jack be nimble jack be quick!

    Weather patterns and conditions seem to be changing more rapidly as time goes on. The Bourgault Speed-Loc System is a proven system of quality quick change cultivation and seeding wearing parts. This means that users can react quickly and easily to any conditions that are thrown at them in short notice ensuring that the tractors keep rolling as long as possible. A-shares / sweeps, knifes, spikes and spoons are all available in the UK at Peterborough.

    As with the Versatile Opener System (VOS) we are seeing not only interest from the OEM market but also from some farmers that want to make more use of existing solid equipment. One example of this is a farmer that had a SIMBA Culti-press and wanted to make use of the existing solid, well built frame. By changing the legs to create a lower leg angle and the addition of a Speed-Loc adapter and a 16 inch A-Share the unit now offers a high speed cultivator that works the top 30mm of soil, levelling and controlling new weed growth

    For further information please contact Ian or Stuart at BTT UK
    Ltd 01733 971971 help@bttuk.com www.bttuk.com

  • Farmer Focus – Antony Pearce

    How I decided to join a carbon payment scheme

    Not a week goes by without another discussion about getting paid for carbon. I know that many farmers are taking a “wait and see” approach and I respect that. Above all, I understand that making a decision to enter this new market feels big and it feels complex. Without good advice on it, or how, to proceed, the natural choice is to do nothing.

    I was in no better position than anyone else six months ago, and I could see that many professional advisors were equally out of their depth, being honest. Nevertheless, I try to do all I can to learn about new opportunities directly myself and so I embarked on a process of systematically engaging the main providers. In the end, I have signed up with Soil Capital and I have tried to document my key learnings to get to that point in a series of videos on my YouTube channel so that others can benefit from what I discovered. Here are some of the most important takeaways that helped me make a decision!

    Carbon payments are based on annual improvements

    Lots of influential bodies and voices seem to be warning farmers against “selling all your carbon now”. This seems to be based on an important misunderstanding about how carbon payment schemes work – at least in annual arable systems. When you engage in such a scheme, nobody is coming along, measuring the total carbon stock in your soil that you’ve built up over the past and offering you a contract based on you keeping that stock of carbon where it is today for the next 20, 50 or 100 years. That may be how it works in forestry, but not in soil carbon.

    Instead, these schemes are offering to generate payments for the new carbon you add to your soil on a year-by-year basis. Contract terms vary, but fundamentally, transactions are organised around this annual flow of new carbon into the soil, not by forward-selling rights to the entire stock of carbon you’ve historically stored in your soil. As it happens, Soil Capital is able to reward both new farming practices and the maintenance of existing ones that achieve these additional flows of carbon into the soil, but the core point is the same – it is annual improvements generating the payments. The decision is not as big as “all your carbon”.

    There are options beyond carbon credits for offsetting

    Discussions on this topic always seem to refer only to “carbon offsetting”. This makes us all think of oil and gas companies, or other heavy emitters, happily polluting the atmosphere and using their profits to clean their conscience and their carbon balance sheet. They formally “offset” their emissions with carbon credits purchased from farmers but they have no relationship with the farmer. This is understandably not such an attractive proposition for many farmers. But it is wrong to think that this is the only way for companies to reward farmers for improving their climate impacts.

    The companies that buy farmers’ crops now have to consider the carbon emissions from their supply chains – including those at farm-level – as part of their own carbon balance sheet. Schemes that enable such companies to incentivise farmers in their own supply chain to improve their carbon performance exist, and Soil Capital is one. In this case, the offsetting dynamic that puts so many off is not there. This is simply companies within our supply chain working to reduce their own footprint.

    Getting to net zero first isn’t a hard requirement

    Surely, if we as farmers are more often than not “part of the climate change problem” we should have to get to net zero ourselves before we can get paid for carbon? I hear this a lot and it is a perfectly reasonable point of view. But we all need to understand that this is a moral position, not a requirement of the market we could be selling in to. For decades, carbon markets have existed to enable the world to find the most economically efficient way to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Reducing emissions has always been in their scope and that has often meant paying people to make changes that reduce their emissions, but see them continuing to generate emissions overall. The discussion about going further and taking carbon out of the atmosphere – including via so-called “nature based solutions” – is much more recent.

    Carbon payment schemes for farmers tend to reflect this market reality – rewarding farmers both for reducing emissions and for increasing our storage of carbon in our soils. The market is comfortable with us getting paid to progress to (and then past) net zero, even if some of us are not there yet.

    You don’t have to tie your hands

    No farmer, especially at such a time of change, wants to enter an agreement that binds them in for the long-term and limits their flexibility to adapt their farming system. This is an area where due diligence matters and two topics stand out: prescribed practices and exiting an agreement. On prescribed practices, I learned that different schemes take different approaches. Some will set as a rule that you cannot cultivate deeper than 10cm. Others will require you to select practices that you will implement from a set menu. I prefer the flexibility to do what I judge is most appropriate for my farm, with visibility of any consequences in advance. This is what I get with Soil Capital. On exiting an agreement, the key thing is to understand the terms for exiting, because these do vary. Some schemes may ask you to pay back portions of the carbon revenue you have previously earned. I looked for straightforward terms that allowed you to exit easily and with no such clawbacks.

    Prices may rise, but moving early isn’t necessarily a disadvantage

    All the signs are indeed that the value of carbon should indeed rise, it’s just a question of by how much and when. What I learned was that, for a farmer already practising carbon friendly systems, delay can be costly because the carbon markets cannot continue to reward carbon improvements in farming indefinitely. Typically, after 20 years or so of consistent good practices, the understanding is that soil carbon levels reach a new equilibrium and so those new flows of carbon into the soil that the market is looking to reward tail off. With that in mind, the question becomes how a scheme commits to sharing the benefits of rising carbon prices with farmers that get involved now. Is the price fixed for a number of years, meaning past a certain point, the scheme operator benefits at the expense of the farmer? Are details even specified?

    Soil Capital was running its scheme in continental Europe before bringing it to the UK. This experience informs their commitment to farmers that the farmer will always earn 70% of the final sales price of their carbon, however high the price rises. I like how this aligns the interests of the farmer with the platform operator.

    I hope my experience helps you understand this opportunity. As I say, there is plenty more on my channel. Whether from the supply chain, the government or just wider society, it is clear that becoming part of the “climate solution” is a challenge we all must face. For me, the right carbon payment scheme can offer transitional payments to help us put carbon friendly practices in place. Along the way, getting proper carbon footprint assessments done and practice improvements certified can only put us in a stronger position for the changing world of CSS, ELMS, SFI and carbon trading.

  • Regenerative Livestock Farming Event Launched To Help Farmers Overcome Industry Challenges

    This summer, a brand-new event is being launched to help livestock farmers get to grips with regenerative farming and see it in action on a commercial farm.

    Down to Earth, taking place on 15 June in Shropshire, is tailored for beef, sheep and dairy farmers. It offers an arena where the whole industry can come together and address the opportunities, facts, and the science surrounding its principles and see them in action. At its core, regenerative agriculture looks at improving soil health or restoring highly degraded soil. This unique event will offer farmers the practical advice they need to start applying its principles back on their farms.

    The event, organised by the RABDF and sponsored by Barclays, Mole Valley Farmers, Promar, Kite Consulting and AHDB, is hosted by organic dairy farmer Tim Downes. He has been using regenerative farming principles for many years and is now reaping the rewards. He is achieving grass yields upwards of 11t of DM a ha without any bought-in inputs, with 4,500L of milk from forage. As well as seeing the regenerative farming principles in action through farm tours throughout the day, Down to Earth will also host top industry speakers, drop-in workshops, practical demonstrations and a range of exhibitors.

    Commenting on the event, RABDF Managing Director Matt Knight said: “As pressure mounts for all livestock farming systems to become more sustainable, the RABDF has launched Down to Earth to offer practical faceto-face help to farmers. Regenerative farming can help build a food system that meets the consumer’s needs, the animals and the environment.

    “Livestock farmers face unprecedented changes with diminishing farm payments, increasing pressures to farm in an environmentally sensitive way, and looming emissions targets. It’s inevitable, as a result of these mounting pressures, all farmers will have to make some changes to say in business. “In addition, food security is also becoming a cause for concern with the pandemic and the Ukrainian war thrusting it into the spotlight. The UK has some fantastic agricultural land and can utilise the uplands effectively with native breeds. So, finding ways to produce world-class food efficiently and in an environmentally sensitive way is a must!

    This year the event will focus on seven key areas of regenerative farming. They are:

    Soil Health/Management

    Soil health is central to regenerative farming and can directly influence the palatability of the grass, grass quality and yield. Farmers can learn about the basics of soil health, how to test soil, what they should be looking for and top tips on improving soil biology for optimum yields.

    Grassland Management

    Multi-species swards can produce high yields of quality forage when managed correctly with potential for excellent animal performance. While many features of managing multi-species swards are the same as conventional swards, there are some key differences. Farmers can hear about establishing multi-species swards, the benefits they offer and how they should be managed.

    Agroforestry

    Trees can offer many benefits in livestock systems, including improved stock health, added nutrient value and environmental benefits. Experts will discuss how trees can be used and established and the grants available to help farmers achieve this.

    Water management

    Research suggests dairy farms pay between £31 and £100 a cow a year on water. However, there are many ways farmers can reduce costs by using water more efficiently and investing in equipment to help harvest rainwater. However, knowing the most costeffective system, the rules and regulations around using harvested rainwater and working out the potential to collect rainwater based on roofing materials and geography can be mindblowing. Hear about the different types of rainwater harvesting systems available, the cost- benefits, keys considerations, and the latest updates on grants.

    Nutrient management – recycling slurry/manure into the system. Cover on the slurry store

    Pressure from the government’s Clean Air Strategy to cut ammonia emissions means farms must look carefully at slurry and manure management. This means farmers may be required to cover slurry stores, apply slurry using low emission spreading equipment and bring in tighter housing designs. Experts will talk about preparing for new rulings coming from the Clean Air Strategy, including identifying the grants available.

    Bokashi bugs – improving soils

    The Japanese process ‘bokashi’ can turn manure into a valuable soil improver whilst reducing carbon and nitrogen emissions. The technique involves ensiling farmyard manure, inoculated with a mix of microbes to create an optimal soil conditioner used to promote soil microbiology, while significantly reducing carbon and nitrogen losses. It is believed every 1t of bokashi applied can save 40-50kg of bagged fertiliser. At Down to Earth, visitors can find out how to get started with Bokashi, the costs and paybacks, and see the finished result of the process.

    Carbon workshops

    Conducting a carbon audit is something most farmers will have to do as the net-zero deadline nears. Farmers can learn how to get started with carbon auditing, what’s involved, the costs and tips on getting started on the journey to net-zero. Experts will also delve into the science behind carbon sequestration and outline why farmers are part of the solution to climate change.

  • Drill Manufacturers In Focus…

    MZURI PRO-TIL PRODUCES CONSISTENT CROPS FOR USER CHRIS HEATH

    Fourth generation farmer, Chris Heath and his family have been farming Warwickshire countryside along the historic Fosse Way since the 1940’s and now farm 3300 acres. With a broad portfolio of soil types ranging from sand to heavy clay, the family’s enterprise is diverse and in addition to their arable enterprise, they also run an agricultural manufacturing business – Heath Engineering. Manufacturing a range of tele-handler implements including the Heath Super Chaser, the company also makes 16t grain and silage trailers and 32’ flatbed trailers. Alongside this Chris and his family also operate the diversification, Newbridge Straw Products and produce straw bedding products for the Equine and Poultry markets, largely using raw materials produced on their own farm.

    Up until more recently, the arable enterprise has largely been plough based but in response to the rising cost of fuel and increasing grain price volatility, Chris and his family have started to move away from heavy cultivations. The farm went down the min-till route with a popular tine drill which proved beneficial but after poorly performing headlands – and a lot of them, the decision was taken to purchase a Mzuri Pro-Til 4T to increase crop consistency whilst still keeping fuel usage down and minimising machinery and labour costs.

    Described as a ‘leap of faith’ Chris took delivery of the four metre Pro-Til and after less than 6 months of ownership, defined the Mzuri as a ‘god send’.

    This consistency is most remarkable on a headland of Spring Barley that was earmarked for woodland due to its consistent poor performance. “The headland in front of the wood has always performed poorly and lies very wet. With the Mzuri, it’s allowed me to drill when its ready and the front leg lifts out wheelings giving me good establishment edge to edge – it’s all good.” Part of the reason Chris believes the Mzuri Pro-Til performs so well on headlands is down to the patented independent pivoting coulters. Accommodating both horizontal and vertical movement, the coulters pivot to follow the front legs even around tight corners and places the seed in the centre of the tilled strip, the perfect position for quick, even germination.

    It’s this ability to bring all areas of the field up to a good standard that Chris believes will give him the edge on yield. With a lot of smaller fields, headlands can make up a large proportion of the cropping area and having these perform as well as the middle of the field should see a big impact on the farms average yield.

    Chris puts this consistency down to the Pro-Til’s leading leg which loosens his heavy clay soils and prepares a nursery seedbed to drill into, whilst leaving structured soil between the rows. The drills central row of weight bearing wheels spread the weight of the machine evenly over the tills and allow for even reconsolidation of the seedbed. This has been particularly beneficial for fields that were to be conventionally drilled in the Autumn and cultivated with a Vaderstaad Top Down in preparation for drilling but can be prone to slumping in high rainfall. In this situation, Chris says “The Pro-Til’s leading leg cultivates just enough to allow the crop to root well early on and gave it the best start.”

    The drills leading leg has also allowed Chris to place his seedbed fertiliser below the seed which he suggests is another reason why his crops perform so well in the Spring. Chris believes there could be a real benefit to placing all of the fertiliser requirement below the seed at drilling. He will be continuing to trial this and hopes this will not only give the crop all the nutrition it needs where it needs it, but also minimise his risk against dry weather, and reduce the need for additional passes saving time and money. 

    Favouring the targeted applications of strip tillage, Chris also places his seedbed slug pellets down with the seed. “There’s no need to waste it between the rows, instead we’ve applied it exactly where it’s needed” Using a relatively low dose, this targeted application should see the active be just as effective as broadcast, if not more so and more responsibly used.

    Being a relatively new user, Chris has been very impressed with Mzuri’s level of service and support that is available to operators. He has even seen an increase in interest for his contracting services since adopting the new system and after picking up further income drilling Maize, it seems there could be further demand for strip tillage establishment in the area which the family are well placed to accommodate. As a leap of faith that has paid dividends so far, Chris’s takeaway message for anyone considering the strip tillage system is that it can often be a change of mindset but you will get out of the system exactly what you put in. He suggests by working with the system and understanding what you’re trying to achieve – the results speak for themselves.

  • Strategic Farm Report December 2021

    Tis the time of year to reflect on progress, thing you’ change and things you’ll keep just as they are.

    In this spirt, its time to review progress at AHDB’s Strategic Farms and share some results with you. From the 15 of November, we ran Strategic Farm week with four distinct themes.

    • Can flower strips reduce insecticide use?

    • Managed lower inputs

    • Catch and cover crops

    • Cultivations and soil management

    We’ll take a brief look at the Wildflower and grasses mix establishment and the beneficial insects it attracts and how far they can migrate.

    Can flower strips reduce insecticide use?

    Patrick Barker of CJ Barker & Son, Lodge Farm, Suffolk AHDB Strategic Farm East grows wheat, barley, rye grass for seed with a strong emphasis on conservation management and healthy soils as the foundation of the farm. “We know BPS schemes are being phased out and we are already preparing for that” he said. “the farm margins must be included as the whole farm management and employed to deliver a viable farm business” Establishment, into a ryegrass stubble, Sumo Trio pulled through, then power harrowed and used a tined seeder at half rate and covered twice and rolled.

    Thistles were dug out and hand, one plot established in spring 2020 and central plot established in the following autumn. What’s the biggest lesson? Ensure the conditions are right, fine seedbed with warmth, moisture with rain in the forecast. Overall, however, ‘farm like an environmentalist’ confirms Patrick. David Aglen, Farm Manager at Balbirnie Home Farms, has hosted Strategic Cereal Farm Scotland since September 2020, a 1,200-hectare mixed farm with 800 hectares of arable crops and 200 suckler cows and a diverse rotation including oats, spring barley, winter wheat, spring beans, potatoes and brassica vegetables

    Key areas of focus include regenerative agricultural practices,

    plant and soil health and reduced inputs.

    His Strategic Farm has just started last year and is at a much earlier stage, in fact at the baselining stage of the project. Not in any environmental schemes as they are too difficult to incorporate into the business. We are looking to introduce more livestock into the arable side of the business. As for flowering strips, they are established on the field veg side of the fields ends and within the tramlines to help with soil erosion and to see if more beneficial insect species into the fields as well as pollinators. As, yet Scottish policy makers have not published what farmers should focus on. Aoife O’ Driscoll, Crop scientist at the NIAB Group, specialising in pathology and entomology and strategies for disease management,

    Looking at establishment of species it should be remembered some will take longer to establish and will become prominent in the next few years. No encroachment is seen yet but is expected from year 2 and beyond. No two floral strips were alike in their plant species composition, think about location, establishment, and management:

    Location

    • Select sites that don’t have existing/near to noxious weeds problems

    • Less fertile soils are better to discourage grasses

    • The wider the sown area the better to avoid ingress from the edges.

    • Selecting plant species appropriate for the soil type and climate

    • Even better if they already occur in other areas on the farm,

    • Grasses can be included but usually establish anyway

    Establishment

    • To cultivate, direct or plough?

    • If you have a weed burden, keep cultivating pre-sowing, no real benefits seen between ploughing and cultivating but either practice must see a warm, moist seedbed.

    • Weed problems: repeat the process of cultivating and letting weeds emerge as many times as possible before broadcasting on to a fine seedbed then roll.

    • Sow when warm and into a moist soil March/April or August/ September

    • Avoid dry periods.

    Management

    • Options: Cut and collect, cut and leave or cut in spring?

    • Avoid cutting all areas at the same time to ensure that flowers are constantly present somewhere.

    • Leaving some scruffy areas or allowing weeds to survive in the crop also has value e.g., for bees.

    • Many hedgerow plants are also valuable and should be encouraged e.g. hogweed, wild parsnip

    Hoverfly larvae are great little predators, eating 100s of aphids before pupating and emerging as flies. The flies don’t eat aphids but need to find pollen and nectar – so floral strips are really important for them around arable crops.

    Key take home messages; Pests & natural enemies

    • Predators disperse into the field at different rates and can complement each other

    • Grassy beetle banks can provide infield overwintering habitats

    • In field flower strips can provide forage for parasitic wasps and hoverflies when adults

    • Multifunctional margins: Flower strips + tussocky grass species, or alternate grass and flower strips

    • Diversity of habitats support a diversity of natural enemies & pollinators

    As Strategic Farm Scotland further established into the project more data and answers will emerge. Clear there is plenty more work and analysis to complete. Stay tuned within these pages and look-up AHDB Strategic Farm on-line for much more information.

  • What Do You Read?

    If you are like us, then you don’t know where to start when it comes to other reading apart from farming magazines. However, there is so much information out there that can help us understand our businesses, farm better and understand the position of non-farmers. We have listed a few more books you might find interesting, challenge the way you currently think and help you farm better.

    Spoon-Fed

    Is breakfast really the most important meal of the day? Is there any point in counting calories? Is there any evidence that coffee is bad for us? Through his pioneering research, Professor Tim Spector busts these and many other myths about food. Spoon-Fed explores the scandalous lack of good science behind many diet plans, official recommendations and miracle cures, and encourages us to rethink our whole relationship with food – not just for our health as individuals, but for the future of the planet.

    Defending Beef: The Ecological and Nutritional Case for Meat, 2nd Edition

    “We all need to understand the story behind our food. This is the strongest and most articulate case for understanding the central importance of grazing livestock in sustainable food systems that I’ve read.” Says Patrick Holden, founder and chief executive, Sustainable Food Trust. With more public awareness of the connection between health and diet, food, climate and farming, Defending Beef – a modern classic on sustainable food culture – has never been more timely. As the meat industry – from small-scale ranchers and butchers to sprawling slaughterhouse operators – respond to climate threats, a pandemic and the rise of plant-based and lab produced meats, environmental lawyer turned rancher Nicolette Hahn Niman delivers a passionate argument for responsible grassfed meat production and consumption in this updated and expanded new edition of her bestselling Defending Beef.

    Hahn Niman dispels popular myths about how eating beef is bad for our bodies and the planet. The impact of grazing can be either negative or positive, depending on how livestock are managed. In fact, with proper oversight, livestock can play an essential role in maintaining grassland ecosystems by performing the same functions as the natural herbivores that once roamed and grazed there. Grounded in empirical scientific data and citing examples of regenerative agriculture from around the world, she illustrates how cattle can help build carbon-sequestering soils to mitigate climate change, enhance biodiversity, prevent desertification and provide essential nutrition.

    For the Love of Soil: Strategies to Regenerate Our Food Production Systems

    *Newly Edited Version* Learn a roadmap to healthy soil and revitalised food systems for powerfully address these times of challenge. This book equips producers with knowledge, skills and insights to regenerate ecosystem health and grow farm/ranch profits. Learn how to:- Triage soil health and act to fast-track soil and plant health-Build healthy resilient soil systems-Develop a deeper understanding of microbial and mineral synergiesRead what weeds and diseases are communicating about soil and plant health-Create healthy, productive and profitable landscapes.Globally recognised soil advocate and agroecologist Nicole Masters delivers the solution to rewind the clock on this increasingly critical soil crisis in her first book, For the Love of Soil.

    She argues we can no longer treat soil like dirt. Instead, we must take a soil-first approach to regenerate landscapes, restore natural cycles, and bring vitality back to ecosystems. This book translates the often complex and technical know-how of soil into more digestible terms through case studies from regenerative farmers, growers, and ranchers in Australasia and North America. Along with sharing key soil health principles and restoration tools, For the Love of Soil provides land managers with an action plan to kickstart their soil resource’s well-being, no matter the scale. “For years many of us involved in regenerative agriculture have been touting the soil health – plant health – animal health – human health connection but no one has tied them all together like Nicole does in “For the love of Soil”! ” Gabe Brown, Browns Ranch, Nourished by Nature. “William Gibson once said that “the future is here – it is just not evenly distributed.” “Nicole modestly claims that the information in the book is not new thinking, but her resynthesis of the lessons she has learned and refined in collaboration with regenerative land-managers is new, and it is powerful.” says Abe Collins, cofounder of LandStream and founder of Collins Grazing. “She lucidly shares lessons learned from the deep-topsoil futures she and her farming and ranching partners manage for and achieve.” The case studies, science and examples presented a compelling testament to the global, rapidly growing soil health movement.

    “These food producers are taking actions to imitate natural systems more closely,” says Masters. “… they are rewarded with more efficient nutrient, carbon, and water cycles; improved plant and animal health, nutrient density, reduced stress, and ultimately, profitability.”In spite of the challenges food producers face, Masters’ book shows even incredibly degraded landscapes can be regenerated through mimicking natural systems and focusing on the soil first. “Our global agricultural production systems are frequently at war with ecosystem health and Mother Nature,” notes Terry McCosker of Resource Consulting Services in Australia. “In this book, Nicole is declaring peace with nature and provides us with the science and guidelines to join the regenerative agriculture movement while increasing profits.”Buy this book today to take your farm or ranch to the next level!

    Introduction to the Biogeochemistry of Soils

    The first process-based textbook on how soils form and function in biogeochemical cycles, offering a self-contained and integrated overview of the field as it now stands for advanced undergraduate and graduate students in soil science, environmental science, and the wider Earth sciences. The jargon-free approach quickly familiarises students with the field’s theoretical foundations before moving on to analyse chemical and other numerical data, building the necessary skills to develop questions and strategies for original research by the end of a single semester course. The field-based framework equips students with the essential tools for accessing and interpreting the vast USDA soil dataset, allowing them to establish a working knowledge of the most important modern developments in soil research. Complete with numerous end-of-chapter questions, figures and examples, students will find this textbook a multidisciplinary toolkit invaluable to their future careers.

  • Direct Driller Patrons

    Thank you to those who has signed up to be a Direct Driller Patron after the last issue. Our farmer writers are now rewarded for sharing their hard-earned knowledge and our readers have the facility to place a value upon that. The Direct Driller Patron programme gives readers the opportunity to “pay it forward” and place a value on what they get from the magazine. But only once they feel they have learned something valuable.

    We urge everyone reading to consider how much value you have gained from the information in the magazine. Has it saved you money? Inspired you to try something different? Entertained you? Helped you understand or solve a problem? If the answer is “Yes”, please become a patron so that we can attract more new readers to the magazine and they can in turn learn without any barriers to knowledge. 

    Simply scan the QR code to become a patron and support the continued growth and success of the magazine. Pay it forward and pass on the ability to read the magazine to another farmer.

    Clive and the rest of the Direct Driller team

  • Introduction – Issue 16

    Farming is not the only industry to face tsunami-sized variations in product prices and input costs. Think airlines, oil, retail, manufacturing, restaurants, hair dressers, theatres… I recently had a very interesting conversation with a very senior oil man who explained the hugely difficult and expensive process of shutting down a refinery and the equal cost of starting it up again. He said that Shell, his company, were employing advisors far more than ever before, as the challenges, and costs of wrong decisions are so high.

    “We’re excellent at operating plant, but find a second pair of eyes from outside the business is well worth while when looking at the direction the company needs to be moving.” I translated it to farming, and the move toward No-till, and wondered how many farmers turn to a second pair of experienced eyes. Like the oil-man, the good farmer can be excellent at squeezing profit from a relatively static situation, but may not have the eyes which see woods rather than trees when it comes to the long term.

    Do you go green and go with the flow, or be controversial and opt to continue focussing on production? If it’s production, the perceptive long term advisor might well focus on climate change and the possible shortage of water, while the farmer may look at a new harvester or some extra land, issues which are shorter term. Farm planning needs a view over the horizon which might appear some way off at present, but will as sure as eggs is eggs come all too quickly.

    Finding an advisor with vision who looks beyond the present is difficult. Years ago the avuncular bank manager performed as general consultant, advising on loans and farm development, and they have largely been taken over by consultants who want to do indepth surveys, before hopefully reaching a conclusion.

    A Happy Christmas to all Direct Driller readers.

  • The Face of Farming Leadership

    Some people are born to be leaders, most just learn on the way. The latter seems to be how it works in farming. Our leaders are bred. Groomed though various roles to be the right mix of farmer and business we need to represent us. I’ve had the pleasure in meeting some of the spokespeople of farming in the UK and very few strike me as born leaders. The born leaders are the one’s that inspire you being around them. 

    For instance, Minette is a brilliant public speaker, great on the TV and the perfect face of farming. Which is exactly what she needs to be as the public head of the NFU. Never has farming needed a presentable and eloquent public face as much. Minette deals with news presenters’ questions and vegan activists with exactly the articulacy we need. I doubt she inspires many farmers, but that’s not her job in my opinion. A job which I hope she keeps for a while longer and I’m sure she will just get better and better at. But she doesn’t lead the NFU. She represents it.

    Who are our leaders then? 

    Jim Mosely CEO of Red Tractor, Nichols Saphir is Chairman of AHDB, Professor Caccamo is CEO of NIAB. It’s not them and we shouldn’t be looking to them. They organise and control, not lead. It’s certainly not the politicians or wannabe politicians. All of them are paid to do a job and after enough years of that, they seem to care more about the next role than the cause. The merry go-round of civil servants in our industry is blatantly wrong. Although it’s nice to see so much new blood coming in at AHDB from outside farming. Our leaders are the ones that make their voices heard and give their opinion. 

    Those that are both doing and talking, where farming is still more of their role (neatly ruled myself out there). There are so many examples, the farmer focus writers in this magazine, YouTubers, farmers doing their own farm tours, the speakers at Groundswell, the NFU county chairs. You have met so many of them and they have inspired you. They don’t claim to lead our industry, they just do. You have listened to them and acted on what they say. You have absorbed and learnt from them. That’s what leaders do.

    Farming has plenty of leaders, they just aren’t who you think of when you say “leader” out loud.

  • The 8TH World Congress On Conservation Agriculture

    The Future of Farming: Profitable and Sustainable Farming with Conservation Agriculture

    Held virtually in June 2021 in Switzerland and attended by 783 participants from farmer associations, international organisations, scientific institutions, private sector, non-governmental and civil society organizations, from more than 108 countries, from the developed and developing world. The main objective of the 8WCCA was to celebrate the Conservation Agriculture Community’s success as the driver of the biggest farming revolution to have occurred in our lifetimes, and to build on this and boost the quality and speed of this transformation globally towards sustainable agriculture in support of the Sustainable Development and the international climate goals.

    Naturally grown soil is a limited, scarce, non-renewable resource. It is the base for the production of healthy food and native wood, a buffer element for the global hydrological cycle, filter substrate for clean drinking water, global carbon store, habitat of a huge biodiversity and element of attractive landscapes. At the interface of atmosphere, hydrosphere and lithosphere, the soil fulfills indispensable ecological, economic and social functions. The future of the world’s food security requires soils which are unpolluted, of stable structure and productive, in short – a sustainable soil use. Conservation Agriculture (CA) and its many locally adapted variants offer the best means of using soils for productive farming while enhancing their ability to fulfil their vital societal and planetary functions.

    Accumulated positive experiences and scientific knowledge about Conservation Agriculture (CA) are leading to its rapid adoption world-wide. Farmers now apply CA on over 200 million hectares (15% of the word’s annual cropland area) in over 100 countries across a diverse range of agro-ecological zones and farm sizes, in all continents but particularly in Africa, Asia and Europe. It has enhanced farm production and reduced costs while conserving and enhancing the natural resources of land, water, biodiversity and climate.

    In contrast, conventional tillage practices are not ecologically sustainable since they degrade land by destroying soil structure and biodiversity, reduce soil organic matter content, cause soil compaction, increase run-off and erosion and contaminate water bodies with pollutants and sediments, threatening land productivity, environment and human health. In addition, they produce unacceptable levels of greenhouse gas emissions, speeding up climate change. World-wide, they have accelerated degradation of many natural ecosystems, decreased biodiversity and increased risks of desertification. CA avoids many of the negative consequences of conventional tillage agriculture by replicating natural processes through the continuous avoidance of soil tillage, permanent maintenance of a soil mulch cover through which diverse crops are directly seeded or planted and rainfall can enter the soil and be retained, cutting erosion.

    CA enhances the crop root environment (soil structure, carbon, nutrients and moisture) and cuts the buildup of pests and diseases. 2 In these ways, CA results in a productive agriculture for food security and improved rural livelihoods, especially women’s welfare since they provide a high proportion of agricultural labour. Its many economic, social and environmental benefits justify a fundamental re-appraisal of common farming methods. This Congress has confirmed that CA is here to stay. It has shown that the CA Community is in very good health, full of energy and new ideas. It has confirmed the validity of the Community’s way of operating, with farmers in the driving seat, innovating, sharing experiences, spreading the word and creating demands for supportive services from the public and private sectors.

    All of us who have participated feel proud of our Community’s achievements and are determined to do everything within our power – and working with others who share our determination – to contribute to the emergence of a truly sustainable future of farming worldwide. We are confident that the millions of CA farmers whom we have sought to represent here will echo our commitment. We call upon politicians, international institutions, environmentalists, farmers, private industry and society as a whole, to recognise that the conservation of natural resources is the co-responsibility, past, present and future, of all sectors of society in the proportion that they consume products resulting from the utilization of these resources, noting the increasing interest in plant-based diets to improve human and planetary health.

    Further, it calls on society, through these stakeholders, to conceive and enact appropriate longterm strategies and to support, further develop and embrace the concepts of CA as a fundamental element in achieving agricultural-related Sustainable Development Goals including those with a social and economic perspective, and those of ensuring the continuity of the land’s ongoing capacities to yield food, other agricultural products, water and environmental services in perpetuity. It follows that the environmental services provided by farmers who nurture soil health should be recognised and recompensed by society. 

    Action plan

    The Congress participants declare their commitment to engage the CA Community in achieving the following goal and to taking the actions needed for this.

    Goal

    Given the urgent need to accelerate the global move to sustainable food systems, and in particular to respond to the global challenge to mitigate the advancing climate change, the Congress agreed that the CA Community should aim at bringing at least 50% of the global cropland area or 700 million hectares under good quality CA systems by 2050. These holistic CA systems would involve CA farmers in engaging progressively in the full array of sustainable approaches to farming, adapted to their ecological and social conditions so as to maximise the sustainability benefits of growing crops without tillage.

    Practical actions

    To achieve the goal, a massive boost should be injected into the momentum of the CA Community’s activities with a concentration on the following six themes:

    1. Catalysing the formation of additional farmer-run CA groups in countries and regions in which they do not yet exist and enabling all groups to accelerate CA adoption and enhancement, maintaining high quality standards. 3

    2. Greatly speeding up the invention and mainstreaming of a growing array of truly sustainable CA-based technologies, including through engaging with other movements committed to sustainable farming.

    3. Embedding the CA Community in the main global efforts to shift to sustainable food management and governance systems and replicating the arrangements at local levels.

    4. Assuring that CA farmers are justly rewarded for their generation of public goods and environmental services.

    5. Mobilizing recognition, institutional support and additional funding from governments and international development institutions to support good quality CA programme expansion.

    6. Building global public awareness of the steps being taken by our CA Community to make food production and consumption sustainable.

    In order to facilitate the implementation of above thematic activities, the Congress endorses the need to:

    (a) operate the Global CA-CoP as an independent non-profit mechanism, with ongoing hosting support of ECAF and patronage by FAO, and with an advisory panel, and authorised to set up task forces and working groups to help implement the priority practical actions;

    (b) strengthen the CA-CoP Moderator capacity within the CA Community;

    and (c) create a CA Hall-of-Fame in time for the 9th Congress.

    It would also oversee and support future processes for convening CA World Congresses. The Global CA-CoP would require a permanent IT systems development and operating capacity, with sound financial management, programme monitoring and reporting capacities.

    The Congress participants feel confident that much of the extended moderation function can continue to be provided by CA Community participants who are willing to provide their time, knowledge, expertise and energy on a voluntary basis. This Congress has reinforced our conviction that it is entirely possible to meet the global goal of making our food systems sustainable in every sense of the word and that our Community has a vital role to play in this transformation. Our own experience shows that farming can quickly respond to new challenges when farmers see that these are in their own interests.

    Our aim is to engage our whole Community as quickly as possible in creating and spreading optimal and profitable low-input, high-output CA-based farming systems that are dependent on biological forms of crop protection and plant nutrition management with maximum energy efficiency and minimal use of externally sourced inputs. This approach shows our commitment to making all we do together in future still better than what we now do! We pledge to work at all levels with all who share this vision of farming for the future, seeking their guidance and sharing what we learn with them. And we will also partner with those who champion complementary changes in downstream elements of the food chain to bring to healthy nutrition for all people and the elimination of food waste.

    Healthy soils are the very heart of healthy lives and a healthy planet!

  • The Seed Microbiome

    Written by Joel Williams

    In the last article we introduced the various habitats that exist on and within plant tissues where a range of microbes coexist with plants and provide many benefits to growth and development. Despite the majority of microbiota living around plant root systems, there are also a range of microbes that also uniquely associate with plant shoots, leaves, flowers or seeds; and we are only just beginning to understand their importance. In this article we will take a closer look specifically at the seed microbiome and explore some of the factors that shape this biome and how this can be of benefit toward a more sustainable agriculture.

    Like many other examples in agriculture where we have tended to focus on the negative, the prevalence of pathogens on seeds has been extensively studied and has dominated much of the thinking regarding seed microbiota. However, the occurrence and role of other beneficial microorganisms – which constitute a majority of the seed associated organisms – are relatively unknown. Seeds generally present similar proportions of bacterial and fungal diversity, which contrasts with other aboveground plant compartments that are for the most part, highly dominated by bacterial diversity. Microbial communities associated with the seed coat are usually more diverse than those associated within the seed – only a smaller number of specialist microbial species have the ability to pass through the external barriers of plant tissues and colonise tissues within; most others can only associate with the external surfaces.

    In the same way that there are unique and distinct microbes that associate with different plant parts, there are also specific microbes that associate exclusively to distinct micro-habitats of the seed itself. There are three seed compartments where microbes associate – the embryo, the endosperm and the seed coat. Seed-associated microorganisms can be acquired either ‘horizontally’ from various and local environments (e.g. air, water, insects, seed processing) or ‘vertically’ passed down from the mother plant, and hence, transmitted across multiple generations. Overall, microbes associated with the embryo and endosperm (internally) are more likely to be transmitted vertically than those associated with the seed coat, these being mostly transmitted horizontally.

    Three main transmission pathways have been documented:

    1. The internal pathway – whereby microorganisms colonise developing seeds via the xylem or nonvascular tissue of the mother plant.

    2. The floral pathway – whereby microorganisms colonise developing seeds via the xylem or nonvascular tissue of the mother plant.

    3. The external pathway – that represents microbial colonisation of developing seeds through the stigma.

    Of course, the development and application of the majority of seed treatment technologies have focussed primarily on the external pathway. Some of these inoculants are designed to remain on the outside and colonise the roots as they develop while some are destined to become endophytes and enter the plant tissues (such as rhizobia or some mycorrhiza for example). The exact mechanisms which determine the final structure and composition of the seed microbiome are still being elucidated but factors that influence this include a range of environmental conditions, soil type and perhaps most importantly, the host plant itself plays a major role in shaping its seed microbiome.

    It is now understood that each and every plant species recruits and structures a microbiome unique to that species (referred to as its core microbiome), and even going beyond this, different varieties also shape their own ‘varietal specific’ microbiomes. These kinds of insights are opening some fascinating doors to understanding the species specific nature of plant-microbe interactions, which in the future will no doubt help design efficient production systems whereby plant varieties and microbial strains are highly aligned and optimised for various outcomes (plant health, pest resistance, nutrient use efficiencies etc). Although I fully support the use of highly diverse, broad spectrum and DIY inoculants like compost extracts, there are many examples whereby successful suppression of a pathogen (for example) is dependent on a specific antagonistic mechanism from one particular microbial species (or even strain); so illuminating some of these highly specific crop-microbe interactions at the molecular level will be a fruitful endeavour in years to come. 

    In the meantime, it is clear that the seed microbiome is of utmost importance to plant development – affecting growth, drought resistance, disease resistance and even flowering times. We know the seed microbiome becomes active immediately after sowing as the germination process begins. These microbes associated with the seed are the early risers so to speak and consequently play a key role – somewhat as gatekeepers – in safeguarding the seed and communicating to the rest of the soil biome and shaping which organisms from the soil can or can’t subsequently colonise the seed and the emerging roots and shoots.

    This early structuring of the microbial community that subsequently colonises the plant can have major and long-lasting implications on how the root and shoot microbiome matures through the rest of the plant developmental stages. There are major knowledge gaps on the impact of fungicidal seed dressings on the nontarget organisms of the seed microbiome. We can safely assume that at least some beneficials will be compromised but whether the use of such inputs may be leading to negative consequences – such as greater disease susceptibility – in later crop stages remains to be studied. Even less understood is whether fungicidal dressings may be impacting the composition of the seed microbiome that is subsequently inherited from the mother plant to the next generation and hence inducing transgenerational changes in the seed microbiome over time.

    Practically speaking, there are 3 take homes we can draw from these insights.

    1. Eliminate the use of fungicidal seed dressings – if this idea is too daunting for you, start small. Choose half a field or a few tramlines and start the process on a small scale. Observe as you go and scale up in stages that are comfortable within your attitudes to risk. 

    2. Substitute dressings with bioinputs – rather than just cut out dressings, it really is preferrable to substitute the chemical with other biostimulants or bioinoculants. These could also be applied to the seed or injected into the furrow where possible. Input substitutions might include humic acid, fish hydrolysate or molasses along with some kind of microbial inoculant such as compost extracts or commercial products. 

    3. Save your own seed – considering that part of the seed microbiome is inherited from the local environment (mostly the soil), saving seed from plants that were grown in your soil is potentially optimising the microbiota that associate with your seeds to your specific soil type, growing conditions and management practices. There is still much to learn regarding these potential transgenerational effects but early indications suggest this is worth pursuing. 

    References

    1. The variable influences of soil and seed-associated bacterial communities on the assembly of seedling microbiomes. (2021). doi:10.1038/s41396-021- 00967-1.

    2. Seed microbiota revealed by a large-scale metaanalysis including 50 plant species. (2021). doi:10.1101/2021.06.08.447541.

    3. Plant Communication With Associated Microbiota in the Spermosphere, Rhizosphere and Phyllosphere. (2017). doi: 10.1016/ bs.abr.2016.10.007

    4. Inheritance of seed and rhizosphere microbial communities through plant–soil feedback and soil memory. (2019). doi: 10.1111/1758- 2229.12760

    5. Revisiting Plant–Microbe Interactions and Microbial Consortia Application for Enhancing Sustainable Agriculture: A Review. (2020). doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.560406 

  • History Of The GD

    Written by Tony Gent

    With over 60 years of farming, I have seen and been involved with so many changes, as a lad from working with horses and leaving school at 15 to working on my father’s smallholding with only 50 acres and a mix of cropping. The farm began to mechanise and expand, so did my interest in designing better tools, particularly to improve soil management. The need to produce crops in an economic and competitive way has always been my driving force, with the sustainability of the business as well as ecology and the environment.

    We first started to notice the importance of soil condition in the 1960s, with taking on heavy distressed soil which was suffering from poor cultivation techniques, resulting in pans and compacted layers. Having mastered those problems it became obvious that moving soil around was not only complex and expensive, but the soil workability was deteriorating and more liable to slump, cap and puddle.

    At that time larger more complex machinery was becoming available and seen as a major part of the solution. To take advantage of larger tractors, particularly tracklayers with threepoint linkage and larger 4-wheel drive in the 70s my first development was what became known as the “Wilder Pressure Harrow”, my own design of harrow which was manufactured and marketed by John Wilder Engineering. This consisted of ground following individual units mounted on a parallel linkage, pressurised by a floating hydraulic down force and tines that could be infinitely adjusted. This allowed the scrubbing frame to achieve a precise seed bed for both spring use, on overwintering ploughing and on heavy tined cultivation in the autumn. The Pressure Harrow was awarded a silver Medal at the Royal Agricultural show in 1977 for machinery innervation.

    With much more emphasis on autumn crops, especially oilseed rape and September establishment of wheat, the Pressure Harrow became invaluable for scratch tillage that was widely adopted. However, to fight soils that were in a poor structural state causing rooting and drainage problems a means of lifting and shattering the soil with minimal surface disturbance was needed. Together with Ken Taylor a local agricultural engineer a low disturbance subsurface tine was developed. This featured a slender point and front shin together with large wings to shatter the soil with a wide lateral effect, allowing wide tine spacing. It achieved the effect of loosening all the soil with no layer mixing or bringing unwanted soil to the surface. It became known as the “Flat Lift” 

    Demand for this method of low disturbance soil loosening coincided with larger horsepower, mostly American, tractors becoming available and to meet the demand for the Flat Lift an engineering company was founded to manufacture and to market it, an agreement with Parker Farm equipment was put place with the product being known as “Parker Farm Flat lift” manufactured by Taylor-Gent Engineering. However, as others adopted this approach competition from more established companies became intense, and as a small specialist manufacturer it was not viable. The rights to the product were acquired by Spalding’s, who still market it as the original “Flat Lift”

    There was no-doubt we were on the right lines with all this. However, the whole process had to change as attitudes to straw-burning changed in the early 90s. We had become experts at this, using combines fitted with spreaders to achieve a 100% burn, completely obliterating trash with no chemical help such as glyphosate. However, as autumn cropping became more common, the intensity of the burn inevitably led to straw-burning being banned, and it almost seems incredible now this practice lasted so long. Although we now realise what we thought was an idyllic situation, but with the first signs of chemical resistance creeping in especially with black grass and brooms we now realise this was an unsustainable situation.

    The straw burning ban was a massive game changer, as we were growing lots of second and third wheats that were early drilled, producing high volumes of straw to deal with. We had to revert to moving soil around with some inversion or mixing to bury or at least incorporate the straw to some degree. This caused a massive reinvestment in machinery and power to rapidly recover aggressively moved soil into a suitable seedbed in a very short time.

    During this period, we took advantage of land becoming available with rapid expansion in acreage. Much of this was again soil in a distressed state requiring lots of TLC. Also, with the new FBT and contract farming arrangements with strong competition the rents tendered subsequently proved to be far too high. We had no choice but to invest in lots of power and big soil moving and drilling kit. Due to our limited cash resources and our ability to mend and make, this was done with a focus on quantity rather than quality. At the end of this period, we owned 3 CAT Challengers and a full set of the kit to utilise them that was rapidly becoming very tired.

    Into the 2000s now farming a large area, costs were rising, and we were in a period of low commodity prices with wheat as low £60 to £70 per ton and locked into historic rents that were proving unsustainably high. This all came to a head in the years 2004 to 2008 when we knew we would need to re-invest in newer machinery. Given the intense workload and poor margins, with no prospect of improvement this seemed a questionable investment and caused us to re-evaluate what we were doing.

    It was at this time I had a chance coming together with the UK No-till pioneer Tony Reynolds. I was NFU County Chairman and he became my Vice Chair. Many of our NFU meetings would end in discussion around soils, much to the disquiet of some. This resulted in several visits to his farms to get an understanding of what he was doing and above all to tap into his knowledge and experience and gain confidence to try it for ourselves. Subsequently also becoming involved with experiences of the Europe wide ECAF (European Conservation Agriculture Federation) which he is part of. 

    We began to move towards a change in 2007 with the first wheat being established with the Vaderstad Rapid drill after a light scratch to allow the conventional light discs to penetrate undisturbed soil. This first year with wheat it was a success and very encouraging. We also attempted oilseed rape sowing with a hired Bertini drill into a heavy surface residue situation in wet conditions. This was a total failure due to slugs, hair pinning and toxin damage.

    Drilling kit for No-till was somewhat limited at the time, and with our soil conditions resulting in producing large broken out clods with a solid tine and potentially high residue we felt we must stick to a rotating disc. The options were basically only Bertini or John Deere.

    At that time, I was invited to Argentina to visit the Bertini factory in Rosario and attend the Expoagro Farm Show, where I found lots of Notill kit of various designs and creations, mostly very basic or locally specialist. It had the feel of being built in the farm workshop or by the local blacksmith, not at all to European standards except for a few more serious manufacturers like Bertini. Argentina was forced into No-till by economic pressures of direct commodity taxation forcing massive simplification with cultivations resulting in cost cutting. They had been advised that as result of this they would suffer approximately 20% yield loss, but the reality was after 5 years their yields were actually greater as a result of adopting Notill. Their perception, probably correct of Europe was that we were given so much financial support that we didn’t need to consider costs and we just wasted money on lots of complex kit with shiny new paint. I came home with what seemed to me a simple thought that if I pursued their logic of production methods, together with the benefit of the support it would be a win-win situation and basically that is what happened.

    To make a solid start we needed to jump in, and the first necessity was a drill. Having seen both the Bertini and the John Deere in action, I liked the double disc system of the Bertini with its slender opening, low disturbance and so returning from Argentina I came close to placing an order for an 8 metre Bertini. However, considering that it was a box, end tow for transport drill and having experienced and seen its limitations in our wetter conditions thought better of it. So, to get us going a new John Deere 6 metre 750A was ordered for the 2008 autumn season to work alongside our team of Challengers and conventional 8 metre Vaderstad.

    For this season all the rape was very successfully established, wheat direct drilled after Beans and some second wheat with the John Deere. With the second wheat we had an interesting and revealing comparison: our standard practice for a second wheat then was to plough followed by a press and then to aid weathering mostly the need for a second press with tines. At drilling three CAT challengers were in action with a primary seedbed cultivator, followed by a power harrow and then the 8 metre Vaderstad and then having to be rolled, 6 or 7 operations in total. I remember in one situation I was drilling a next field in the same rotational situation with one pass with a 150hp tractor and the new John Deere 750A. The No-till crop established well and became a robust crop and out yielded the conventionally established crop.

    With this first year experience our direction became cast in stone from that point on and we began disposing of the now unwanted tractors and machinery, eventually resulting in the removal of a 1000hp from our system. By 2009 we were fully committed to No-till but in the subsequent years it was by no means plain sailing: and sometimes conditions weren’t exactly favourable, experiencing wet seasons and degraded soil that needed time to recover.

    I felt that the compromise I had taken opting for a single disc drill was starting to show and began to reflect back to my observations with the Bertini double disc with much less disturbance of the opening and a kinder soil action. I became aware that Weaving Machinery were seeing opportunities in the No-till marketplace and revamping their Krause system into what became known as the Big Disc, of which we acquired an 8 metre version. It consisted of a double disc arrangement of a small disc running in the shadow of a larger disc thereby creating a very narrow opening, but the opening still had to be closed which was difficult in dry hard conditions and was only achieved by pressing and squashing in wet conditions. The problems were because of the unbalanced side pressures of large and smaller disc the rigidity of the linkage required the same robust construction that was needed with a single disc, and that was its failing which limited its effectiveness.

    The breakthrough came with a passing comment from Tony Reynolds that if it was possible to cut into the soil at an angle to place the seed under a lip of soil it would be much easier to close the soil over the seed. The problem was how in practice to achieve this. My first indication of a possibility along these lines was becoming aware of the Canadian Saskatchewan “Barton Opener” which is a single angled undercut disc system. However, subsequent investigation found that it had limited minimal disturbance and seemed to have technical limitations with stability robustness.

    I began to realise that to achieve stability with a disc system, the force of moving soil to create an opening needed to be countered by a stabilising force on the same bracket. I began by taking the standard Weaving Big Disc arrangement and hinging it on an angled pivot to create a neutral trailing action. I then gradually increased the angle from vertical to approximately 20° to 25°. This achieved the undercut angle I was looking for with the smaller disc on the upper side creating a wave of soil flowing over it with the rotation forming an opening with very little soil disturbance, damage, or side compression due to the soil being gently eased upwards. The larger disc formed the initial soil cut, helping with a precise and slender opening for the seed. The main benefits are that an opening is created to place the seed in the soil without having to move the soil sideways, so there is no requirement to return the soil back to cover the seed. It was often described as like lifting the edge of a carpet and placing seed under it and it then returning to position covering the seed (see attached photo of an early demonstration unit)

    Weaving Machinery quickly saw the potential of the system and a manufacturing and marketing deal was agreed and production began in 2015. The GD (Gent Disc) drill quickly became extremely popular in the UK, many European countries and subsequently New Zealand.

    Later that year I visited Australia and picked up a contact I had made with the famed Bill Crabtree “No-Till Bill” in Western Australia. He introduced me to Darryl Hine of Direct Seeding and Harvesting based in Albany WA. Darryl was one the leading exponents of introducing No-till machinery to Australia and was the importer and agent for the Canadian K-Hart range of disc drills.

    With introduction from Darryl, I then visited K-Hart at their premises in Saskatchewan, where I stayed for a few days with farmer and engineer Kim Hartman getting to know them and their product which was similar to Weaving’s and consisted of a conventional double disc system. We did some trials with some Weaving GD Units that had been sent to them, which they were impressed with and quickly saw the potential. Again, a deal for manufacture and marketing covering North America and Australia was put in place and with some redesign to adapt to their standard parts production began of the “K-Hart Gent Opener” in 2017, with modifications to the design to suit their conditions both in North America and Australia. I have subsequently visited both Canada and Australia to help with further design refinements and promotion of the opener where interest and sales are rapidly increasing. K-Hart has now evolved into an expanding company involving a new team to design and develop a specialist unique frame to suit the “Gent Opener” branded the “Spider” frame. These frames are up to (76ft) 24 metres wide which folds in 5 sections and have typically 100 to 130 openers.

    Our farm has now been No-till for 12 to14 years and we have absolutely no regrets. As envisaged in the early stages, it has been a win-win situation of lower operating and input costs with sustained or improved yields. We now have a more sustainable rotation and massively improved soil with organic matter levels that started at near nil now close to double figures on many fields. The release of capital also allowed the business funds to invest in the massive expansion of a fledgling enterprise on the farm of Free-Range Egg production.

    The transition from an intensive high input to a low input and much more rewarding and sustainable system has been a very interesting and a rewarding journey. New benefits are now emerging, with the demise of subsidy support on the horizon, addressing climate change and carbon sequestration. This latter opportunity has now been identified as an additional income stream that can help support and encourage more farmers in adopting No-till, so again we have a win-win situation.

  • Welcome To The 8TH World Congress On Conservation Agriculture

    Speech given by Professor Amir Kassam

    Friends, This is an historic day for the CA movement. It was twenty years ago that ECAF, the European Conservation Agriculture Federation, organized the First World Congress on Conservation Agriculture in partnership with FAO. Today, thanks to continued support from FAO and ECAF as well as other sponsors and especially SWISS NO-TILL, we are gathered together here in Bern and all around the world to celebrate our success as the drivers of the biggest farming revolution to have occurred in our lifetimes. Let us celebrate our joint engagement and contribution to transforming farming from being the main source of land degradation globally, to becoming a driving force for conserving and rebuilding healthy soils and agroecosystems so that they can sustainably meet the world’s future needs for food and other farm products while helping to slow the pace of climate change and ecological breakdown.

    Let us celebrate our part in the 2 transformation of farming, from being a contributor to the many interconnected crises facing the world, to being a key part of the solution. It is no exaggeration to claim that our achievement in engaging millions of farmers across every continent in what has become known as Conservation Agriculture – or CA – has been a massive game-changer. We can and should take great pride in all we have done but we still face huge challenges to complete our revolution so that what we have pioneered is steadily improved and becomes the global norm in farming. Our task during these 3 days on-line, and in the field days, is to shape the future directions in which we need to move together to achieve this in the shortest possible time. 

    For this, we must apply lessons from our collective experience over the past 50 years or so. We have come this far because of the foresight and determination of some remarkable visionaries and pioneers – mostly farmers – in the USA, South America, Asia, Africa, Europe and Australia. These pioneers saw that conventional tillage, involving frequent inversion of the topsoil, was damaging the structure of soils, reducing their organic matter content, and making them susceptible to erosion by wind and water. They showed us that we could grow productive crops without digging or ploughing, and they devoted their lives to improving 3 CA technologies and sharing them with others in their own countries and beyond.

    Rather than list these pioneers by name, I invite each of you to think back to the beginnings of CA in your own country and to reflect on the exceptional people who challenged conventional wisdom and put their ploughs aside. One of the most notable of the early CA pioneers in the Global South was Dr. Herbert Bartz who sadly died recently. In 1972, with encouragement from Rolf Derpsch from GTZ, he became the first Brazilian farmer to throw away his plough. From then on, he devoted his life to improving CA techniques and promoting CA in Brazil and globally. Now, Brazil has become a leading CA nation with 43 million ha – or nearly 80% of its annual cropland – under various forms of no-till agriculture. Herbert was hoping to be with us today and had prepared a brief video message to inspire us to follow in his footsteps. 

    I am delighted that his daughter, Marie, has joined us in this Congress, and she will have more to say about her father this evening at the Social event where she will be showing the video. I invite you to watch another video now which Herbert made not long ago for a CA Congress in Africa. Let me now briefly touch on our achievements When the pioneers of No-Till said that good crops could be grown without digging or ploughing, most farmers laughed in disbelief and dismissed them as dreamers. Now, just half a century later, millions of farmers all over the world have taken them seriously. They have embarked voluntarily on all kinds of CA systems, no longer carrying out any tillage on their farms. The global area farmed using CA systems has risen from less than 1 million ha in 8 countries in 1970 to 205 million ha in 102 countries in 2019.  

    This is 15% of the world’s cropland area. In Argentina, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Paraguay, South Africa, Uruguay and the USA, CA methods are applied on more than half their cropped area. From 1990 to 2009, the CA area globally increased at an average annual rate of 5.2 million ha, reaching about 100 million ha in 2008. From then on until now, the CA area expanded at double that rate, attaining an average of 10.5 million ha per year. This was largely because the global CA Community of Practice (CA-CoP) was established in 2008, with its own communication and 5 networking platform, and began to globalize CA through the farmer-led CA movement worldwide.

    The CA-CoP, of which I am Moderator, is a fast-growing openended community in which any person or institution interested in CA is welcome. While its network and mailing lists extend its reach, it has no list of members, no membership fees, no hierarchical structure and no officers with executive powers. It is glued together by its adherents’ commitment to farming without soil tillage, their natural inclination to innovate and their enthusiasm to share their experiences. This has led to the formation of many local CA groups which, in turn, are linked to regional groups in regular contact with the Moderator.  

    With the valuable patronage of FAO and much goodwill and support from other international entities, the Global CA-CoP has come to play an important catalytic and facilitating role, including the promotion of regional programmes and national activities, sharing experiences, making information, especially on innovations, widely accessible, and engaging donors and financing agencies in funding local CA programmes. All of this has been done with the intent that farmers remain in the driving seat. The triennial Congresses provide the opportunity for all interested parties to take stock of progress, to share experiences and ideas, and 6 to chart the future directions in which the Community will seek to move.

    This has clearly succeeded! CA is now practiced in all major climate zones in which there is farmed land – from the warm humid tropics to the cool temperate areas. And it is applied in all the world’s main farming systems. It has taken hold in rainfed and irrigated areas, short-term and perennial crops, mixed crop-animal farms and organic systems. It has been adopted by large-scale mechanised farms and by smaller farms where most of the work is manual. CA has also evolved into a wide range of complex farming systems which make the most of the improved soil conditions created by the absence of tillage. But in spite of all of this, our movement remains vulnerable to possible changes in the governance of our global food system.

    A surprising threat could come from transnational corporations, convened by the World Economic Forum in Davos, which have declared a 4th industrial revolution. This would be based on harnessing ‘big data’ to tell every farmer what to grow and when to plant, and to manipulate consumers’ food choices. While they claim that this will cure the ills of the global food 7 governance system, I feel bound to ask: Will this address degradation of our common resources and the planet? Will this meet the needs of small-scale farmers and protect their seed, land and food sovereignty?

    Will this change our food distribution system to a more equitable one that would eliminate hunger and lead us to healthier diets? In raising these questions, I am not denying that there are many valuable opportunities for widening the use of digital tools to empower farmers and consumers to make better choices – but without infringing on their rights to make their own decisions.

    The reality is that we are the great farming revolutionaries of our time for large- and small-scale farmers. Together, by translating our knowledge and convictions into practical action on the ground, we are leading the most transformational revolution in how land is farmed since the inversion plough was invented in the mid-17th century.

    We have successfully challenged the universally held assumption that most land has to be regularly and intensively tilled and chemicalized to be productive and profitable. We are also proving that the widely held view that smallholders have no future is nonsense. We do this because we believe in it, based on the evidence generated by the early no-till farmers. Nobody 8 has had to order us to stop ploughing and digging and nobody has had to pay us to change our ways! Farmers are the initiators and drivers of the CA movement, its main innovators, and its main promoters.

    Their success, including spreading and adapting CA into new ecologies and farming systems, has led to the growing involvement of scientists and created a demand for specialised equipment and inputs that has expanded the participation of the private sector in our revolution. The main motivation for farmers’ engagement has been CA’s potential for net gains in productivity and incomes. By eliminating tillage, larger farmers have cut spending on farm machinery, inputs and fuel, while small-scale farmers have not only made big savings in time and human energy from excluding deep hand-digging, but they have also found that they can move into CA with few purchased inputs and rely on their own seeds.

    Formal research systems have become increasingly engaged in comparing the impacts of different CA interventions especially on soil structure and biology, moisture retention, carbon sequestration and pesticidefree weed and pestmanagement. There is now a huge raft of easily accessible scientific studies on almost every dimension of CA applications. Thanks to the expanding databases of CA networks, FAO and Cornell 9 University, information is easily accessible on almost every dimension of CA in text-books, and in scientific and technical studies. In future, however, researchers and farmers must do much more to team up in generating new CA systems knowledge.

    One feature of CA is that its adoption and spread does not follow traditional linear agricultural extension models that transfer the findings of researchers to farmers. Instead, farmers themselves play the major role in innovation through CA Farmer Associations, Farmer Field Schools, Clubs and Networks as well as through community engagement. These social institutions offer opportunities for sharing knowledge and for cultivating solidarity that stimulate change and self-empowerment. This works effectively for all farmers when their skills, and needs for seed, land and food sovereignty are respected and supported by governments and stakeholders in the public and private sectors.

    True, the private sector has responded well to demand especially for machinery and inputs, but in many places, CA farmers call the shots and the private sector has to offer a mutually beneficial service support along the value chain. 10 We are pushing ahead with CA and improving it as we go, mainly because we have found our incomes rising and the quality of our farmland improving. CA differs from the dominant ‘industrial’ approaches to tillage farming that have been driven by the goal of ever greater intensification, aimed at maximising yields.

    They use more and more inputs and need ever bigger investments. Over time, they all too often damage or destroy the soils and environment that provide the foundations for food production and environmental or ecosystem services, and also put human health at risk of nutritional disorders. In spite of CA’s rapid spread, tillage-based agricultural intensification continues to cause vast physical and biological soil degradation and erosion, forcing the abandonment of once productive agricultural lands, increasing the frequency of flood damage, polluting our environment with toxic chemicals, releasing high levels of greenhouse gases, wiping out biodiversity, and reducing adaptability and resilience to biotic and abiotic stresses as well as fostering resistance to antibiotics. It seems to come naturally nowadays for humans, at least in so-called ‘developed countries’, to think that more is better.

    We now realise that satisfying the desire for more and more material things without considering their environmental impact is putting at risk the future 11 of our children and grandchildren, and of all those with whom we share the planet. CA’s success comes from deliberately moving in exactly the opposite direction. We are getting more from less and bequeathing a healthier planet to future generations. We have already shown the ability of CA’s core practices of no-till, soil mulching and crop diversification to provide an effective foundation for integrated biological pest management and for drastically reducing agrochemical use. 

    We have also shown in several environments with smallholders and large-scale farmers the avoidance of the use of pesticides for controlling weeds, insects and pathogens through for example Push-Pull strategies, techniques of planting green involving green manure cover crop mixtures, and manipulation of soil fungi-to-bacteria ratios. And many smallholder farmers are practicing CA without the use of any agrochemicals. This is why FAO placed CA at the core of their ‘Save and Grow’ global strategy for sustainable production intensification. CA is good for all farmers, good for the land, good for the planet and good for people.

    Let us now look to the future of CA There is no doubt that CA is a success story that is here to stay and that it will continue to grow fast. But what 12 about our expectations for the outcomes of this Congress? The organizers of the Congress are convinced that CA must be the mainstay of the shift that the world has to make urgently towards sustainable farming and food systems. This is because we know that, for as long as most soils continue to be damaged by tillage, the world cannot reach the goal of making food systems sustainable. But we also recognise that some aspects of No-Till systems, as they are now generally practiced, are restricting sustainability.

    Specifically, some No-Till systems with poor cropping diversity still remain too dependent on pesticides (especially herbicides), on mineral nitrogen fertilizers, and on unduly heavy farm machinery driven by fossil fuels. I am sure that you will all agree that this has to change. Within our global Community there are many precedents for moves in the right directions, but we need to throw our weight behind accelerating their enhancement and uptake, so that CA becomes synonymous with sustainable farming for the future. We also know that we cannot go it alone. We must engage globally and locally with the champions of other 13 essential elements of sustainable farming, especially those engaged in organic farming, integrated pest management, agroecology and regenerative farming systems in their various guises.

    In return, all these farming systems can be helped to harness CA principles and practices. If we do not share our experiences, help each other and pull together, many of the international Sustainable Development Goals – the SDGs – relating to food, natural resources management and climate change will be unattainable. We also have an important role to play in the recently launched UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration 2021-2030. I also suggest for your consideration that the time may have come for our Community to begin to help to shape food consumption patterns in ways that will relieve pressure on the world’s finite area of cultivable land rather than destroy forests and other vulnerable ecologies to expand farmed land, with doubly negative effects on the rate of climate change.

    Fortunately, we are faced with a win-win-win opportunity, as the area under farming can be greatly reduced, environmental damage curbed and human health improved by inducing a shift towards predominantly plantbased diets: this, in turn, would cut demand for livestock feeds which has been a main driver of the recent damaging expansion in cropped areas especially in tropical regions. 14 It is against this background that I suggest that this Congress may wish to signal its support for a notional goal of having good quality CA-based systems fully applied on at least 50% of the world’s annual cropland area or 700 million ha by 2050. 

    I believe this is an attainable goal given that the global CA movement doubled the rate of uptake of CA during the last decade. The big challenge will be to graft the other essential elements of sustainable farming into all our programmes – including those in the existing 200 million ha already applying CA. Achieving this goal would require a massive boost to the momentum of our Community’s activities with a concentration on the stated six themes.

    To move forward with this, strengthening of the Moderator capacity within the CA Community is now needed. Much thought must still to be given to this, but one thing is clear: we must retain the concept that, as now, our future actions must be guided mainly by a growing team of volunteers coming from within our midst who are committed to giving their expertise, time and energy to enhancing and spreading CA systems. Earlier, I paid tribute to our pioneers and champions. With millions of farmers now applying CA in its many variants across the world, I feel confident that plenty of 16 people will signal their willingness to dedicate themselves to moving our activities forward.

    One of the few positive by-products of the COVID pandemic is that it has stimulated great advances in information and communications technology. We are applying some of these in this largely virtual Congress. Any new actions need to take the fullest possible advantage of these innovations. One important implication is that all those involved in any new programme moderation arrangements can make most of their inputs from where they live. Of equal significance is the huge opportunity that these technologies offer for accelerating the spread of advances in knowledge across our Community and beyond.

    The Community’s strength has been built on farmer-to-farmer sharing of experience, usually within their own localities and sometimes through country exchange visits. Now these farmer-to-farmer exchanges can instantaneously become global. And so, we shall nurture the emergence of a stronger moderating mechanism that will function almost entirely virtually. It would enjoy the guidance of an advisory panel, representing regional and national interests and those of cooperating institutions. It would have the capacity and power to set up task forces to 17 push forwards on each of the 6 main themes – and any more that might be added.

    And it would need to have a permanent IT systems development and operating capacity. It would also oversee and support future processes for convening CA World Congresses. Finally, it would have to be set up as an entity – perhaps as a nonprofit organisation — with sound financial management, programme monitoring and reporting capacities. Finally, though this may seem a minor issue, I also propose that we convene a small working group to set up arrangements for honouring our pioneers through creating a CA Hallof-Fame in time for the 9th Congress. To get started immediately on this expanded agenda, ECAF has generously agreed that elements of the Congress Secretariat can continue to assist the Moderator in moving ahead with these new arrangements.

    I hope that we can also continue to benefit from the patronage offered by FAO since our work began. I am confident that this Congress will, like earlier ones, give a great boost to our efforts and set the stage for a very bright future – a future in which our Community will play a hugely important part in the race to make the world’s food systems properly sustainable. 18 Thank you all for joining us at this challenging moment in our history. My very best wishes to you all for a truly inspiring congress.

  • Farmer Focus – Andrew Jackson

    Harvest has come and gone. Yields were good but could have been better had the growing season not been so variable. We had trimmed our Nitrogen rates to 160 Kg/N/Ha for wheat and OSR, but huge swings of yields within the fields told me that the yield had not been altogether determined by the fertiliser rate but more by the soil type.

    Harvest has come and gone. Yields were good but could have been better had the growing season not been so variable. We had trimmed our Nitrogen rates to 160 Kg/N/ Ha for wheat and OSR, but huge swings of yields within the fields told me that the yield had not been altogether determined by the fertiliser rate but more by the soil type. This autumn our OSR has been drilled mostly with the Horizon drill, which means no leading leg to loosen the soil, most farmers place the seed behind a subsoiler leg, because OSR can be a lazy rooter, so I am a little out of my comfort zone and we will have to wait and see. The rate of DAP has also been dropped to reflect a nitrogen application of 15Kg/N/Ha. 

    The results from the Horizon drill have been pleasing. We have succeeded in uniformly sowing, four millimetres deep for quinoa and grass seed and twenty to thirty millimetres deep for wheat and meadowfoam. Although a small company, I feel that if you are looking for a no-till disc drill, I would recommend the Horizon along with demonstrations of the more established drill manufacturers. As we look to the future and the threat of losing glyphosate, my thoughts are that maybe the drill manufacturer should sell inter-row guided weeders which are compatible with the drill sizes and coulter widths. This may be blue sky thinking but the Chameleon drill has already gone through this thought process.

    After exploring the options of mixing a Johnson Su compost extract with “out of the grain store “wheat seed, I stumbled across an Agritrend concrete mixer bucket. I mentioned in my previous article about the Haggerty’s in Australia were using a grain auger to blend the liquid extract with the seed, however for some reason or other I thought that I would go with the concrete mixer bucket and if all else failed at least I would be able to mix reasonable volume of concrete. The cost of the bucket was more than most would want to pay, but I am pleased to report that Anna and I successfully mixed or blended ten litres of liquid with half a tonne of seed, we then opened the chute at the bottom of the bucket and let the bucket sweep the seed into the drill. This was a batch operation, and four batches filled the drill. The seed flowed well through the metering devices and has emerged evenly, will it make a yield difference? Watch this space.

    David White kindly alerted me to Michael Horsch’s Christmas Fireside chat on YouTube. It was an enjoyable video and at one point Michael discussed making compost in Bavaria using a blend of green chopped cover crop together with chopped straw, the idea being that the straw might turn to some sort of biochar within the compost. The compost would be anaerobic and therefore did not require turning, this appealed to the lazy part of my nature. My brain engaged gear, I did not have access to chopped cover crop, but I did have an aftermath of grass after the grass seed had been harvested (with a stripper header), as well as access to straw. The other benefit would be keeping the straw and grass in the loop of the farm, also avoiding buying in any contaminated compost.

    I eventually contacted Michael Horsch to learn a little more about the process, to my astonishment, I got an email from the man himself. I was almost as exciting as receiving an email from the Queen. Michael explained that the constituents were roughly 50:50 and pointed me towards work that had been carried out by Walter Witte from East Germany.

    Much of the Walter Witte work was in German but I gleaned that volcanic rock dust was also added, the sides Mixing Johnson Su of the clamp should be consolidated, and the height of the clamp should be around 2.5 metres high. After Christmas I watched more YouTube, this time on Bokashi which is an additive to assist anaerobic composting, Bokashi can be mixed by yourself, but I decided to buy some from Agriton. This wacky plan was coming together. The Michael Horsch YouTube showed the forage being chopped and collected with a Pottinger forage wagon. I was reluctant to go down that route and eventually found a contractor who used a whole crop forage harvester to collect the compost constituents and apply the Bokashi liquid. Andrew Sincock from Agriton suggested adding seashells and I also purchased some rock dust from Remin.

    On the day of the compost making, there was much more grass than I had estimated, so the quantites of straw, rock dust, seashell and Bokashi mix could have been increased. The product was placed on a concrete pad and Carl mixed the whole lot with our loading shovel. We are now the proud owners of about 700 tonnes of compost which may or may not be of any benefit, again watch this space.

    My daughter Anna who changed her career at the beginning of lockdown to become a farmer, has gone through a huge learning curve. A lot of what I learnt at Agricultural college is not particularly relevant to this new system of Regenerative farming, so Anna is learning everything alongside me. Anna has a new border collie pup dog called Luna who has got through the biting stage and may be introduced to sheep training soon. One hurdle might be that neither Anna or myself can whistle and Anna has tried the half moon whistles that go inside your mouth but that too, is not going well. Luckily Anna has found a group of ladies on Facebook called “Ladies who lamb”. She has so far quizzed them on various aspects of husbandry as well as what is the best footwear, I suggested that she quizzes them about whistles. She mentions that the ladies’ group of sheep farmers is incredibly positive and encouraging, whilst the men’s group needs to work on the supportive element.  

    Anna has been a photographer and is familiar with social media. This got us into another scrape after I responded to a Base UK committee request from Satchel Classes. They wanted someone to promote Agriculture as a career opportunity, I volunteered Anna and myself and last week we jointly made a YouTube video to promote the cause. There were a lot of mistakes, but the Satchel people liked it, I hope that our mistakes might bring in a comedy element to hold the children’s attention.

    Anna has also been approached by a film crew wanting to make a UK equivalent of “Kiss the Ground”, their version will be called “Six inches of Soil”, I will probably be asked to consult on the movie.

    “There’s really only one place where we can put all the carbon dioxide and that’s in the land” quote from US farmer Ray Mc Cormick, Indiana. This sentence resonated with me and echoed what many books have been trying to put over. It’s just a great shame that people in government don’t read the same books as me. BASE UK exists to share and transfer knowledge relating to conservation agriculture and the modern name of regenerative agriculture and it is these agricultural practices that could as Ray states above, help save the planet.

    Throughout the summer Base UK members are encouraged to host farm walks and invite other Base members. Probably nationally there are hundreds if not thousands of farmers who look over hedges at no-till practices and half hope that the no-till farmers with their much reduced workloads, might go bankrupt in five years, thus, proving their conventional system to be right and regen farmers to be wrong. It occurred to me that I should also invite non-Base members to my farm walks, to explain what I am trying to achieve. Hopefully other Base members in my region could also host farm walks where we could all invite a non regen farmer, thus creating some debate over a beer and a bar snack in the pub afterwards. 

    Within the last year and a half, the Base UK membership has grown from around 200 to 483, this is a good news story, and I would strongly recommend that you sign up for the Base UK Conference in February 2022. The capacity of the Crowne Plaza Hotel in Nottingham will be 300 and bearing in mind the size of the membership, to benefit from the great line up of speakers and the social networking with like-minded people, it would be wise to secure a place in good time.

    For recent regen updates follow Anna’s Tik Tok
    account. @farmerAnnaJackson.

  • Are You Happy With The Quality Of The Lime You Purchase?

    Written by James Warne from Soil First Farming

    A word of warning to all of you who buy bulk lime products. There appears to be nobody in the supply chain fighting your corner to ensure the quality of the lime you buy meets the legal requirements as laid down in the Fertiliser Regulations 1991. 100% of the bulk lime products we see tipped on farm does not meet these specifications in terms of particle size. Even if it’s being sold as screened lime it fails to make the specification. This low quality lime will not be able to neutralise soil acidity as quickly, or for as long, resulting in declining crop performance. I encourage everyone buying bulk lime products to take a sample from the delivered pile before spreading and get it tested for Neutralising Value (NV) and particle size distribution to make sure it meets to specifications of the product. The correct specification is given in the table below. If the analysis results show substandard product, talk to your supplier and send the results to the Aglime Association. It’s only by collective effort that we can encourage change. Always request ground agricultural lime from your supplier and put it in writing.

    The Aglime Association, which represents lime producers, has launched its own assurance standard to ensure product consistency from the quarries. But why do we need another assurance standard when the supply requirements are laid down in law? I mention this topic regularly for good reason. Farmers are paying for sub-standard inputs which can be very costly, not only in the purchase and spreading price, but also the knockon effects of reduced output. Low soil pH can negatively affect nitrogen use efficiency. With urea trading at ~£700/per tonne you need to ensure that you are maximizing its efficiency.

    All ag-lime sold in the UK must meet the requirements of the Fertiliser Regulations 1991 to be sold as lime, for the purposes of this article I will look at limestone only, but these regulations also apply to dolomitic limestone, chalk and many other types of lime. The table below is taken from the Fertiliser Regulations.

    Grind size

    Don’t just buy on neutralising value, the particle size distribution is critical, almost more so. To put it in context, Lincoln Cathedral has a neutralising value, it’s built of limestone after all, but it won’t neutralise very mush due to the low surface area to volume ratio. Grind the stone to 150 micron and it will neutralise acid, provide plant available calcium and react well. Once the levels start to decline the effectiveness of inputs also starts to decline and the return on investment declines alongside. The health of the crop suffers which results in an increase in inputs which are already under pressure. You can see this becomes an ever-decreasing circle of increased cost and decreasing output.

    As mentioned above we now know that grind size is as important as neutralising value in determining whether the lime will actually do as intended. This is where the fertiliser Regulations 1991 become relevant because they set out the standards for lime quality as a fertiliser. If we consider these regulations for a moment it is clear that both the neutralising value and the specific material name must be given, in addition the percentage by weight passing through a 150 micron sieve must also be declared (the grind size). A limit of variation (tolerence) of 5% is allowed.

    By grinding the rock finer we are increasing the surface area of the product. It is this increase in surface area which allows the lime to react faster and bring about quick reductions in soil acidity. If we calculate the degree of grinding and surface area we can see from the table above that ground limestone has a surface area nearly twice that of screened limestone, while prilled lime products can be four times the surface area of screened limstone. This increase will give greater reaction and therefore faster pH reduction.

    So how fine does the rock need to be ground to be effective? The aglime website states that “coarser material requires a heavier application” and “There is a considerable reduction in the effectiveness of liming materials containing particles above 600 microns (0.60mm, 60 mesh) unless the material is easily broken down”. The finer the lime is ground, the more effective it becomes. This is supported by work taken from North Carolina University in the US shown to the right;

    This graph clearly demonstrates that lime in the range of 0.177 – 0.150mm (177-150 micron or 80-100 mesh) gave the quickest pH rise and most sustained pH rise. The larger particle size 0.841mm and above gave a very limited pH increase and took 18 months to achieve it. Focus on the detail of the basics and the output and profitability will follow. My advice to you is avoid buying bulk lime altogether because you cannot guarantee what you are going to receive and instead buy a guaranteed quality product such as a prilled lime which will work for you every time.

  • Drill Manufacturers In Focus…

    With an increasing number of growers now reaping the benefits of lower disturbance drilling such as the Mzuri
    system, we take a closer look at other implements which can prove invaluable to those on the direct drilling journey.

    Stubble Rake

    As we say on our own farm, ‘It starts with the combine’. The first step in direct drilling a typical field is combining the previous crop, so it is only right that this step sets up the field for effective drilling and makes best use of any remaining crop residue. That’s why we like to use the Rezult stubble rake to even out any combine mishaps and ensure an even coverage of straw across the field. Fitted with leading discs, these make an invaluable addition to any rake for chopping surface straw and mixing it with surface tilth to accelerate decomposition. This tilth also makes it easy to create stale seedbeds and encourages a flush of weeds and volunteers ahead of drilling.

    A couple of passes of the Rezult, a few weeks apart can make best use of chemistry for an effective weed kill. By opting for a stubble rake with leading discs, it also gives operators the added flexibility to use as a means of establishing low-cost cover crops when fitted with a seeder box.

    The Rezult rake is also an ideal tool for cutting slug activity, particularly in OSR stubbles, where disrupting slug habitats and exposing eggs to the midday heat has huge advantages for reducing slug populations in the following crop. For Rezult’s fitted with a seeder box, slug bait can be applied at the same time to pack an even bigger punch.

    Low Disturbance Subsoiler

    Whether it forms part of the transition to direct drilling, or used periodically for fields requiring remedial care, a low disturbance subsoiler is a great addition to the direct driller’s arsenal. Our Rehab low disturbance subsoiler has been redesigned for 2021 featuring leading discs, shearbolt protected legs and heavy-duty V-shaped roller packer. As direct drillers turn to less disturbance, some growers report experiencing compaction issues at depths of 6”-8” as a result of machinery passes or long periods of heavy rainfall. The Rehab has been designed to alleviate this type of compaction whilst staying true to growers’ requirements for low disturbance.

    The Rehab features spring loaded pivoting discs which act to slice through topsoil and crop residue, allowing the following leg to lift and aerate the soil profile whilst minimising disturbance to the field surface. A generous leg spacing of 500mm and a stagger of 750mm promotes an excellent flow of crop residue through the implement to reduce the risk of blocking up in high-residue environments – something which is important to maintain for many direct drillers. Operators can determine the level of fracture through the soil profile by choosing from three wing widths including 55mm, 115mm and 135mm. The legs are protected by ‘hammer-thru’ shearbolts rather than hydraulically pressurised to maintain maximum draft control and the correct draft angle of the wing for more efficient use and lower disturbance.

    When designing the Rehab, it was important to create an implement that would leave the field with a weatherproof finish, perfect for direct drilling. The Rehab achieves this by incorporating a V-shaped packer roller which is designed to consolidate either side of the leg and leave an even finish. By minimising surface disturbance and working with previous crop residue, the Rehab achieves better moisture retention whilst ensuring sufficient lifting of the soil profile, complimenting direct crop establishment.

  • Farmer Focus – Tom Sewell

    The good the bad and the ugly!

    As I sit here on the 30th November furiously tapping away to get this written for tomorrow’s deadline I reflect on what has happened since I last wrote. My last piece mentioned how well the crops looked before harvest! How things have changed in just those few short months. The price of wheat, fertiliser and machinery (if you can get it!) have shot up which is encouraging for those who still have wheat to sell and who bought their fertiliser early! I also mentioned the upcoming Groundswell Show which has now been and gone. For me it was a fantastic day (I only went on day 2) bumping into old friends from college, Nuffield, Worshipful Company courses and from interactions on Twitter! I was surprised and dead chuffed to be awarded the Soil Farmer of the Year at Groundswell which has landed me a couple of speaking engagements over the coming months.

    I’ve titled this article “Good, Bad & Ugly” as for me that’s what has summed up the past few months. Looking through magazine articles recently they all seem to feature farmers, growers and advisors who get it right every time and never make any mistakes. They all grow 16t/ha of full spec milling wheat and sell it at the top of the market having bought all their inputs at the lowest price. Their farms are all ring fenced with big open fields and theres never any misses in their drilling! Unfortunately, that’s not the reality in my experience and i wanted to just show some of the ways in which we have learned from our mistakes. So, here’s goes

    The Good

    For me this year I’ve been thankful for a healthy family particularly during the ongoing pandemic. Our 4 children are now at 4 different schools which makes our travel logistics challenging. We have also been blessed this year with fantastic harvest labour on the farm. A call for help on twitter resulted in just the right person coming forward who was keen to learn and competent to get the job done. He had farming experience, was well mannered and was quick to learn (he also played hours of FIFA with my boys!!). Having never drilled a field before we set about throwing him in the deep end and he drilled almost all of our cover and catch crops this year as well as barley wheat and beans. I’m sure he will read this so thanks Jonny, top job! We also had help from Ellie, a student who was keen to learn and did an outstanding job carting grain through our narrow and winding lanes and helped with muck & compost spreading too. Nick was our final part time helper who jumped on a tractor when we were hauling back from the farthest fields and with cheerful confidence managed to get the job done.

    Another “good” was the ongoing relationship that our “Nutters” group continues to develop. Having likeminded farmers locally that we can bounce ideas off, meet up with and critique each other’s ideas is incredibly valuable. I’m thankful for everyone of them and having local groups of farmers all looking to improve soils and reduce inputs is something I would encourage you all to try to set-up or become part of. 

    After many years of friendship and reliable service our independent agronomist, James Rimmer, decided that Norfolk was a nicer place to live and at the end of harvest we said a sad good bye to him walking our fields. It gave me the opportunity to evaluate where we were going and rather than just accept James replacement, we looked at alternative options and employed the services of Edaphos & Mike Harrington for all our agronomy, soils and nutrition advice. Just last week we hosted a brewing day on the farm where Mike, George Hepburn and Nick Woodyatt from Edaphos spoke about biological brews and some of the pitfalls with No-till/regen-ag.

    We have also taken the opportunity to try a Horsch Avatar single disc drill and a Horizon drill this autumn. Both drilled winter beans into wheat stubbles and we were impressed with the job that both drills did. With our expanding acreage and the addition of more contract drilling this year we are finding that our cross-slot drill is struggling to get round the fields in the short drilling window that suits it. We are now collecting compost from a neighbouring soft fruit farm which we will apply next harvest. We applied compost to a lot of our newly acquired land this year and along with chopping the straw, growing cover crops and a more diverse rotation we are hoping too improve the soil and its ability to hold water particularly in the late spring and early summer when our soils can often dry out.

    So what was bad?

    I got COVID! And so did my wife AT THE SAME TIME!!!! It’s now 4 weeks after we both tested positive and i still can’t smell anything and taste is not back to normal. Harvest weather!! After what looked like it would be a bumper harvest in May, the summer really failed to deliver any real meaningful sun or heat. June, July and August can be described as dull and overcast in the main and the deluge of rains we had during haymaking kept soils soft and moist throughout most of the harvest period. We cut hardly any of our crops dry although quality did remain largely good. Fortunately, we are members of Weald Granary which is a farmer owned co-operative grain store locally. They were able to take additional tonnage due to the lower harvest yields locally and have been an absolute God-send in taking all the damp grain that we harvested.

    With the damp and late harvest, we found that chopped straw didn’t break down in the same way as in previous years. This has resulted in high slug populations this autumn and tricky drilling conditions. Cover crops have also really struggled to get away. Admittedly they were planted in the second half of august and had 65mm of rain soon after, but they have been hammered by slugs and the stripes in the stubble created by the drill remain to this day! I still maintain the view that cover crops need to be drilled early and need sunshine!

    So surely nothings ugly?!!

    Well, drilling beans with a no-till drill in late November into sticky clay is not the most enjoyable job and I look forward to unblocking the press wheels on the back of the cross slot as much as a Red Tractor audit!! The beans are drilled, all 20 fields of them, but I’m not sure we’ve made the prettiest job. A bigger drill would have allowed us to plant them all in October when ground conditions were that much dryer. We certainly learn from our mistakes!

    The coming weeks and months will see us busy with logs, workshop maintenance, some meetings and the annual BASE conference which I’m attending this year. We are also looking to simplify a number of our grain stores with old bins and drying tunnels being removed to aid harvest logistics going forward.

    Can I finish by wishing you a very Merry Christmas and a Prosperous New Year.

  • Soil Farmer Of The Year

    The Soil Farmer of the Year competition has been running since 2015, providing a platform for individuals and
    businesses to demonstrate how soil management can build environmental and economic resilience. The competition aims to recognise, promote and champion farmers who are passionate about safeguarding their soils and demonstrates how despite the vast variation across the agricultural sector, sustainable management can be universal.

    This year’s competition was conducted in association with and kindly sponsored by Hutchinsons and Cotswold Seeds, with ongoing support from Innovation for Agriculture. Traditionally the results of the competition have been announced on the main stage at Groundswell agricultural show, and 2021 saw a return to this practice following the cancellations associated with COVID-19 in 2020. The winning farmers from this year’s competition, Tom Sewell (Arable), Sam Vincent (Livestock) alongside Antony Pearce (Runner-Up) joined their fellow finalists ( Jack Martin, Mark Oldroyd and Rob Raven) in discussions of their soil health and regenerative management strategies through presentations to the Groundswell audience.

    Following the announcement of the winners at Groundswell, the winning arable, livestock and runner-up farmers are invited to hold farm walks which are open to the wider farming community. These walks provide a platform for discussion and practical demonstration of how different businesses and approaches have focused upon soil health and land management.

    Arable Soil Farmer of the Year, Tom Sewell from Kent led a tour around his farm during late July to discuss how his management approach has benefited business efficiency and soil health. As a previous Nuffield Scholar Tom has a passion for regenerative farming and sustainable farming practices centralised around no-till systems. A founding member of BASE UK, Tom himself has often contributed to Direct Driller magazine. The farm constitutes around 1500 acres split between 15 different landowners across 8 parishes, all of which is combined into a variable portfolio of soils from river silt to heavier and rockier ground.

    Explaining his management approach as “We’ll get it right, but it takes time, effort and attention to detail”. Challenged with managing highly variable soils Tom has adopted a biologically focused approach, explaining “We maintain the good structure by not ploughing and instead using our worms”. An early adopter of a Cross Slot drill, Tom aims to simplify his arable system through minimising tillage where possible to keep costs low, adding “look at what you do and why you do it and see if you can cut it out”. Inspired by his Nuffield scholarship, Tom has transitioned towards no-till over a number of years, progressing from a disc press to a Simba Free Flow drill before settling on the Cross Slot.

    To maximise the benefits soil biology can provide, cover crops and compost are used to encourage ecological processes to build soil structure and infiltration alongside carbon sequestration. Chopping straw is another practice that Tom has implemented, providing available residues for biological breakdown and soil organic matter building, he states “I just want to improve the soil, I use compost and feed the worms, they’ll do the rest”. Acknowledging that it takes time to build a resilient and dynamic biological system, new land taken into management is treated in this manner with the hope of adding “life back into it” following previous intensive arable or orchard management in other systems. Tom’s compost is usually produced from horticultural by-products such as spent strawberry and raspberry plants and is seen as vital to his system through encouraging plant rooting and worm activity; a key metric Tom uses across his farming landscape.

    Through conducting worm counts and testing he approximates there to be 12 million worms a hectare on average. 

    Logistical challenges alongside those of soil type and weather guide Tom’s decisions on farm in matters such as cover crop selection. Understanding what a cover crop is being used for helps guide budgets and rotational choice, consequently resulting in there often being fields which are left without cover if it doesn’t suit the conditions. However, cover crops still constitute a key management practice implemented on-farm due to the benefits as Tom explains “The cover crop helps to provide that living root and to get organic matter and carbon back into the soil and help the soil to perform”. Increasing organic amendments and encouraging soil biology has enabled Tom to reduce nitrogen applications by 10% for each of the last three years. Balancing applications with a source of carbon helps Tom to continue supplying a above and below ground nutrient supply with fewer kilos of nitrogen.

    This year’s Livestock Soil Farmer of the Year, Sam Vincent manages his 100 cow dairy farm using 130 hectares of permanent pasture without the need for re-seeding in the past 15 years. Based in Dorset, Sam transitioned his herd to organic in 2018 following the challenge of a TB breakdown, explaining “once our cow numbers were lower and following a couple of years where we had cut our nitrogen back dramatically and seen an increase in grass yields we felt ready to make the jump”. Averaging 5,500 litres per cow, Sam looks to maximise his grazing system to minimise costs. Cutting nitrogen usage from 120kg per hectare to only 35kg and seeing success gave Sam the confidence to make the change to an organic milk contract with Arla as well as becoming a member of the Pasture Fed Livestock Association for cattle sold for beef.

    Soils on the farm are variable, and range from higher clay content to more silt based loams. Sam minimises trafficking across his grazing area, avoiding topping and rolling where possible and allowing the cattle to do the work instead – “If you’ve got a rotation, with cattle who are utilising the pasture, then you don’t need to be sat on the tractor”. Sam has seen vast changes not only in his pastures and cattle performance, but equally with his farming approach, explaining “Before we went rushing around, we’ve now got time to stop and think – feel better. We are more resilient and sustainable now”.

    The herd calves in late summer in a single block, which in the future Sam hopes to bring earlier on into the season to a May/June timing. Grazing management is critical to Sam’s success with cattle out early March until the end of November. Youngstock are often grazed for longer on fields away from the dairy to optimise nutrient cycling around the grassland area. Any cattle destined for beef are outwintered using a deferred grazing system, shutting off the driest fields on the farm in early summer and lining out bales. He explains. “In the past we were going back and back to the same fields, eating everything and leaving nothing. Now we try to lengthen our rotations as opposed to keeping the grass continually short.” Sam’s approach can be considered as ‘mob grazing’ and he has seen success with this management system with his British Friesian herd, combining his grazing strategy with a small quantity of concentrate feed (6- 800kg) – “We needed a cow that has longevity, and will work on our system”

    Sam manages forage quantity and quality through monitoring his grasslands, with previous management practices such as predominantly ryegrass re-seeds altering the clover stand in some fields. He explains “We should have done things a little bit differently, but that’s how you learn”. The milking herd are moved twice daily at 12 hour intervals with back fencing – “We cut fields and graze fields in a rotation rather than continually cutting all the time, the flexibility needs to be there to decide based on grass condition and stocking. The fields at the other end of the farm benefit a lot from the flexibility, the soils are a lot shallower”. Using this system Sam has implemented troughs which are designed to be mobile through the use of a skid, meaning that they can be moved daily with the cattle.

    Through monitoring grazing behaviour and milk quality Sam is able to tailor his future management plans on a field by field basis; looking at plant growth stages rather than having a predetermined plan, Sam aims for a 40 day plus field rotation which has previously been highly successful – “increasing the rotation length to 50-60 days, and leaving higher covers we are seeing diversity within the pastures which is as a result of management”. To measure grassland performance Sam currently uses a plate meter and samples the cover and stand regularly, however future developments with satellite measurement is something that he sees being useful.

    Transitioning to this management system and reducing fertiliser application rates has seen Sam’s pastures increase in species diversity – “some people think, in order to get diverse leys you need to rip it all up and start again, but that isn’t the case”. Understanding that throughout the grazing season the species available, such as early season foxtail and later vetches and trefoils, will vary helps manage the ground. Sam explains “We have fields that haven’t been reseeded but have still got diversity including trefoil and native red clover.

    If you reseed with ryegrass, the species that come back once the ryegrass dies back is weeds, usually annual meadowgrass and other non-productive species”. The flexibility of the grazing system, through cutting silage at a similar height to that at which the cattle would naturally produce maintains this adaptability – “if you have a field that you were going to cut but the weather turns wet then it isn’t the end of the world, you can simply go back and graze it”. The highest risk period like on many farms is often early spring -ground is soft and consequently Sam finds that higher residuals and lower stocking rates help to protect the structural integrity of the soil from poaching.

    Regularly weighing cattle helps manage youngstock as they develop. Reared without concentrate on a whole milk diet, Sam finds that separating them into smaller groups when they are turned out they can be easily fed with a 50 teat feeder whilst they begin to graze. Youngstock are managed with a back latch system, being moved once per day onto fresh grass – “if we let the stock graze it then we don’t have to haul the muck out there” adding, “FYM is spread in April on ground which that had been grazed and spread on ground which is cut for silage later after cutting.” Through covering all manure stores, Sam has minimised the need for irrigation of dirty water and installing over 4000 railway sleepers for tracks has increased accessibility across the farmed area. In addition to the cows on farm, Sam also utilises pigs to help compost his FYM in cattle sheds. Through adding corn to the sheds the pigs mix the remaining material over a 6-8 week period.

    Having initially experienced a lower yield through minimising concentrate use on farm, Sam has seen the benefits of a lower input system – “Milk from forage percentage is high and milk solids have gone up. Not having inputs makes an impact on the beef/dairy. Organic milk price means that the impact has been minimal. The business is a lot more stable.”

    Buckinghamshire farmer Antony Pearce is this year’s Soil Farmer of the Year Runner-Up. Having been inspired to start his journey into regenerative agriculture after reading David Montomery’s book, Antony began to transition away from his existing “safe and conventional system”. The 300 hectares of heavy clay arable ground is run in a split system. Half of the farm is under full “regenerative” management and the remaining 150 hectares in what would be considered a more conventional system, allowing Antony to financially monitor the performance of each approach. He explains “My original reason for looking at a low input system was after some conversations that yields were showing what organic farmers would expect. My 10 year average from the conventional system is 9.1 tonnes per hectare. Comparing the numbers, I was spending £130 per tonne for every additional tonne over organic yields. This seemed like something to focus my attention on”. The true success of any regenerative farming practices trialled on the farm is when a particular approach is also incorporated into the “conventional” proportion of the farm. Through his YouTube channel Antony shares and discusses his journey, highlighting the successes and challenges that he has found throughout his journey.

    Focussing on soil health, Antony has gone on to attend Elaine Ingham’s soil health course to realise the importance of the rooting matrix of a plant and the environmental conditions required to access nutrients made available by microbial activity. He explains “Plants are able to secrete 30-40% of their energy through their roots to feed the bacteria and fungi in the soil” adding, “If we are relying on the soil fungi to feed the plants, what negative impact are the fungicides having to this relationship?”. Subsequently, Antony has begun to remove fungicides from his crop protection program, eliminating their use entirely from 150 hectares which is managed in a wholly regenerative manner.

    Runner-Up Soil Farmer of the Year, Antony Pearce demonstrates how he has reduced inputs and utilised data to analyse the success of regenerative practices at his farm in Buckinghamshire.

    Instead focus is upon genetics and variety to provide a natural resistance to disease pressure. Awareness that the carbon from root exudates is often utilised by microbes following nitrogen application, Antony has also moved to reduce artificial fertiliser application. Having initially relied upon imported organic manures for nutrition, Antony now implements cover cropping as a more cost effective approach, finding benefits of a clover or rape/fenugreek understorey blown into a standing wheat crop for blackgrass suppression – “whether it helps my rape yield is immaterial, I don’t want a carpet of blackgrass!”.

    Antony is currently producing oilseed rape using 30kg of nitrogen from digestate and a further 15kg from foliar applications, without any fungicide or insecticide usage. Furthermore, in the previous season Antony had produced a 6.5 tonne a hectare wheat crop on a zero nitrogen system and Elianne oats on a gluten free contract for human consumption using only 15kg of foliar nitrogen and stubble raking to liberate what was already existing in the soil. When conducting nitrogen trials with different products, Antony always leaves a control strip for comparison of the financial and crop data – “there is a need to provide the evidence as to what works on your farm”.

    All straw is chopped to help contribute to organic matter and overall soil health, and again using a stubble rake after drilling oilseed rape to help with slug suppression. This can create a rotational challenge for Antony as it hinders his capacity for cover cropping – “It’s a balancing act, if you go for slug control, you need to rake, rake, rake but you then forego your ability to have a cover crop. Sometimes we manage to get cover through the rape volunteers and it fulfils this function at the same time”.

    As a farm based on heavy clay soils, there are often challenges with trafficability – but focussing on soil health has started to produce results. Regular applications of compost made from a 50/50 mix of cattle muck and woodchip are a major component of Antony’s management practice. Through applying compost in the 5 years prior to a wheat crop, Antony hypotheses that 200kg of nitrogen should be available for uptake. Improving soil health through composting and cover cropping has also seen benefits in water infiltration and holding capacity, something Antony was keen to maximise following a visit to Gabe Brown in America and seeing the benefits this had.

    He explains “back in the winter we had a big crop of mustard, and there was a big rainfall event (around 100ml), the field walked beautifully – it managed to hold onto the water and soak into the soil”. Furthermore, the nature of heavy clay and its predisposition for extreme behaviours such as waterlogging and drought are a constant challenge, but through Antony’s management the rotation has become more flexible – “we can now start to develop a system where we can effectively capture water over the winter through the use of a cover crop which lets the rain work its way into the soil, then I don’t need to worry about spring droughts as the water reserves are there”.

    Antony has also begun to integrate livestock into his arable program, grazing sheep on his cover crops before drilling to introduce more organic matter and nutrients back into the soil profile. He explains “Without a doubt we need to leave at least a month between the sheep coming out and us drilling. The soil needs time to recover, the worms need to come up and grab the muck and reintroduce the air into the soil”. Further adding, “We want the sheep to hit is quite hard and move on, which sometimes can take some explaining. We try and design it so the sheep are hitting the mustard stands earlier in the season and then move onto the vetches later”. Alongside the sheep, Antony has also diversified into other opportunities such as sloe gin, turkeys and dog arenas -maintaining future financial as well as soil focused resilience.

    The three farm walks demonstrate the vast knowledge, adaptability and versatility of approach to soil management. Our three winners continue to demonstrate their passion for soils and the benefits that maximising the quality and resilience of this biome can provide for their businesses.

    The Soil Farmer of the Year competition for 2022 will launch on the 5th of December (World Soils Day). If you are interested in applying or would like to nominate someone who’s work in soil health and farm resilience deserves recognition more information can be found at www.farmcarbontoolkit.org.uk.

  • Trials To Bridge Direct-Drill Yield Gap

    A new approach to crop trials will provide an essential insight into how seed varieties perform under different establishment systems, enabling better advice aimed at maximising performance in the field, including specifically for direct-drill systems.

    While the Recommended List (RL) trials have historically been designed to accurately reflect the genetic potential of a variety, and do give growers crucial comparative data, they are typically undertaken with specialist small-plot equipment, under intensive conventional tillage, in ideal conditions and managed to the nth degree to exploit the best from the seeds.

    Now, at Syngenta we have instigated an exciting new trials programme to run in parallel, aimed at bridging the gap between the small plot trials and different farm practices – to bring a better understanding of how products and varieties perform. The trials will better reflect real farm scenarios, to aid more appropriate agronomic choices, as well as integrating other pressures and influences that impact on growers’ decision-making process.

    Key to the move has been investment in a pioneering new trials drill and equipment, purpose designed to enable establishment in a range of systems, from conventional tillage right through to direct drilling into stubble or cover crops. It also facilitates trials to investigate how wider agronomy aspects, such as drilling date, seed rate, drill coulter width and cultivation methods, influence how varieties will perform.

    The bespoke new drill has been made to Syngenta specifications by Huffle Engineering. The coulters on the drill can be swapped between tines and discs, depending on the drilling scenario required. The row spacings at 12.5 cm allows trials at 12.5, 25, 37.5 and 50 cm crop row widths – to compare results and enable alternative practices, such as mechanical hoeing. The dual hopper on the drill also facilitates trials looking at fertiliser applications at drilling, for example, or companion crops, such as wheat and beans at different seed ratios.

    Seed trialist, Rory Hannam, explained that this unique drill has been specially designed to be more flexible than other conventional trials drills. “It’s a step forward for Syngenta and opens up a whole range of possibilities with the trials work that can now be done,” he added.

    The seed trials’ development builds on our five-year Conservation Agriculture and Sustainable Farming Initiative, comparing crop performance, financial results and environmental implications of crop establishment using three different systems – conventional plough-based; non-plough tillage and a direct-drill.

    Independently monitored and evaluated research, involving over 10,000 measured data points, covers a full-farm rotation on a heavy land site in Leicestershire and a light land farm, at Lenham in Kent. It has shown that while establishment can be more challenging under a direct-drill system and yields might be reduced, particularly in the early years of transition from conventional systems, overall the net farm profitability can be up to 36% higher on light soils (19% on heavy land), and the environmental gains hugely enhanced.

    The research has proven the potential for direct-drill conservation agriculture techniques to significantly cut greenhouse gas emissions, by around 16%, and reduce the carbon footprint of crop establishment on both heavy and light land farms by nearly 10%. Earthworm numbers on the light land soil have been boosted by up to 75% under the direct-drill regime.

    However, we found that over the course of the trial across the two farms, establishment has been lower with the direct-drill or light-till establishment, down by around 3% on lights land and 9% on heavy land. Overall average yields have been down by an average of 7% on the heavy land, but up 3% on light land soils.

    With the potential economic and environmental gains seen from direct drill establishment, the emphasis of the new Syngenta seeds variety trials’ is now looking to overcome that yield gap with appropriate agronomy responses, to get the best performance from varieties.

    In the first season’s trials, for example, results confirmed the challenges of spring barley establishment under a direct-drill system on the company’s heavy clay-loam trial site in Cambridgeshire, into soils that had previously been conventionally ploughed and tilled. Across three different seed rates, of 350, 420 and 525 seeds per m2, establishment was 30% lower with the direct-drill system, compared to minimal tillage or plough-based conventional tillage.

    Furthermore, tillering was greater in the plough-based system, compared to both min-till and direct drill. Compounded by weather conditions after drilling with the lowest April temperatures and rainfall for 30 years, followed by low temperatures and wet conditions in May, this was reflected in the yields where the plough-based establishment was highest. This also showed the increase in seed rate did give a large rise in yield with the direct-drill establishment.

    Increasing spring barley seed rates did also have an effect on increasing yield in each system, however this was minimal in both the plough and min-till systems and did not cover the extra seed cost. The variety selected for the trial was the dual-purpose spring malting barley, SY TUNGSTEN, with potential for both the brewing and malt distilling markets. It has Provisional MBC approval and is undergoing its final year of testing in 2022, with the important attraction of performing well for growers across England and Scotland.

    We plan to repeat the trial in 2022, along with similar trials for winter wheat and winter barley, with an increasing range of varieties. A long-term research project will also look to see how multiple years of the same establishment system, including direct drilling, impacts on variety performance.

    The information we have gathered from these trials will prove essential in helping growers select the most appropriate varieties and agronomic inputs to get the best results from their specific on-farm establishment systems and individual situations. Building a greater knowledge bank of varietal responses to cultivations, in-season agronomy and weather conditions will be essential for farmers’ more effective decision making in the future.

  • Become A Direct Driller Patron, Pay It Forward

    Written by Clive Bailye

    Knowledge is power and it’s exchange is valuable. When I first considered changing the way we farmed I quicky began to realise and understand I didn’t really know how to, I needed to learn, fast.#

    I sought out others that had the experience and skill set I knew I needed to have any chance of success. I was extremely fortunate that without exception everyone I spoke to was happy to help me and share knowledge often passed to them previously by others. These farmers all know who they are, some were in the UK so easy to reach, others I learnt from often required significant travel and the cost associated with that. I invested time and in some cases money in my reeducation and thankfully others invested their time in me, without reward and for that I will be forever grateful. It was an investment that has since paid me back many times over.

    Direct Driller magazine was conceived just 4 years ago out of frustration that other farming media lacked the independence and quality information a farmer would need to move successfully to a regenerative agriculture system. Although the team behind bringing you the magazine have a web-based background, we realised that printed information can be powerful and physical media can be kept as a valuable source of reference on a shelf. As interest in alternative farming systems grew, we saw there was a rapidly growing movement in UK agriculture that really wasn’t being served, encouraged by others we felt we needed to fill that gap.

    Following our core principles, we were determined to remain as independent as possible. Advertising was to be kept to a minimum and focus placed as much as possible on farmer’s content. We knew that farmers learnt best from other farmers and by blending it with quality information from academics and researchers in the same pages, we could create a truly interesting and useful publication that subscribers wanted to read from cover to cover. We have so far remained true to that ambition, this magazine carries only just enough adverts to cover its cost, none of the editorial staff or excellent farmer contributors are paid, we rely heavily on the generosity of others to share knowledge and experience as in many case others did for them in their transition to regenerative farming.

    We have also remained true to our ambition to make this publication free to any reader creating no barriers for anyone interested in learning. Anyone in the world can get a PDF of the magazine for free. This growth and success have far exceeded any expectation. The feedback from you, the readers, has been amazing. But with this success has come a problem, you may have noticed we didn’t attend CropTec this year. We can’t afford any more readers. At a time when most magazines are seeing big drops in circulation our readership has grown rapidly and continues to do so with each issue. Like everything, inflation has also hit print and the cost to print magazines has grown. Each copy of the 100-page magazine costs us around £4.25 to collate, print and post so as circulation grows so do costs.

    The usual solution is to change the ratio of advertising to content. Charging a subscription is another option we have considered, however, we don’t want barriers to learning. We could also limit the number of printed copies we produce. We feel the information printed in these pages really should be available to all. None of these options align well with the ethos of the publication. We know our farmer writers should be rewarded for sharing their hardearned knowledge and readers should have the facility to place a value upon that. Our solution is to launch the Direct Driller Patron programme which aims to give readers the opportunity to “pay it forward” and place a value on what they get from the magazine. But only once they feel they have learned something valuable. The funds raised will only be distributed among these writers (excluding our staff) and invested in developing and distributing better, independent, high-quality content.

    I urge everyone reading to consider how much value you have gained from the information in the magazine? Has it saved you money? Inspired you to try something different? Entertained you? Helped you understand or solve a problem?

    If the answer is “Yes”, please become a patron so that we can attract more new readers to the magazine and they can in turn learn without any barriers to knowledge. Simply scan the QR code to become a patron and support the continued growth and success of the magazine.

    Another way to help is only have a printed copy if you really need it. Email us if you want to change to a digital subscription.

  • Plan The Move To Direct Drilling Carefully

    Both cover crops and low-disturbance drilling are often seen as an easy way to improve soil health and performance
    while also offering an opportunity to cut fixed costs. Where the transition is managed well, it can be very worthwhile
    but in other cases, the journey to drilling nirvana can be a fraught with obstacles, explains Steve Corbett, trials
    manager for crop advisers and research specialists, Agrii.

    “The move to reduced cultivations or pure direct drilling is about first recognising where systems can change while preserving or improving financial returns,” he says.

    The first consideration, he believes, is to understand why the existing system is arranged as it is. “Systems are often soil dependant. There is a need to identify the characteristics of a seed drill that are important to the operation and the objectives set by the manager. Any pre-drilling activities should also be considered, be it straw raking or shallow cultivations. There are situations where moving the top centimetre or so of soil will be highly beneficial and others where it is not necessary,” Mr Corbett says

    The development of new technology, especially the ability to apply inputs in a precise manner, and to incorporate more than one activity at a time, namely fertiliser placement and sowing of cover or companion crops, should also be considered.

    “There are many facets to the direct drill conundrum. Do you want to apply fertiliser at the same time, and will you be sowing more than one crop too? This is before we consider the diversity of crops in the rotation, time of drilling, be it early or late autumn, or on cultivated or non-cultivated ground. As precision technology comes to play an ever-greater role, growers may also want to consider the potential to integrate variable rate systems. This often needs to be considered before we think about coulter travel or lift and how effectively the various setups can handle surface trash,” Mr Corbett says.

    Soil type is often both the determining and limiting factor. It tells you what you have to work with and will define the scope of your objectives. For example, will it easily take water, is it easy to create a tilth, how much air will be displaced if we were to receive a heavy rain shower? From here, we can see what is and is not feasible.

    “At the basic level, soil type and condition will influence the choice between a disc or tine drill. These considerations rarely receive the time they warrant. Whether the disc runs at a slight angle with the coulter in its shadow or the disc is straight, and the coulter forces the opening will depend on the soil type and its condition. Issues such as hair-pinning, where the straw is forced into the opening, or where the opening can’t be closed after the seed has been placed because of the high plasticity of the soil, are often consequences of inappropriate drill choice or poor setup,” he says. 

    In a high weed pressure situation, especially black-grass, the considerations will be different again. There will be the desire to avoid bringing seed up to germination depth. In these situations, the minimal soil disturbance will be preferable. This would favour the Primera from Amazone or the Sabre tine from Weaving. In contrast, a winged tine is not suitable, but where more soil movement is desirable, the looser soil created by the likes of the Simtech or Cross-Slot allow for greater root development.

    For many the move to direct drilling fits with the ‘re-generative’ movement, but it can take several seasons and a change to the system before the ground is properly ready to embrace the ‘re-gen ag’ philosophy. “It’s about earning the right to direct drill,” says Colin Lloyd. “Any drill in the wrong conditions will do a poor job and it concerns me that many growers are moving wholesale into direct drilling without first readying their ground. The transition phase is important as it paves the way for the drill that you have then chosen to fit your system,” he adds.

    Manufacturers often make bold claims about details such as coulter pressure, but how much is enough, and do you really need masses of pressure? “Those with stiff, firm ground will need the ability to apply pressure, but where soils have been maintained in good friable order and compaction has been avoided, having the ability to apply 250kg of pressure per coulter is an expense that most can live without,” says Mr Lloyd. As efforts to improve soil biomass begin to deliver results, other design features become more important, such as the ability to deal with high quantities of material without becoming easily blocked.

    “This is one reason why the Amazone Primera is popular with a section of growers. It has the size of frame and coulter arrangement to let material through. Other designs fail all to easily at this hurdle, especially if it is wet,” says Mr Corbett.

    Having explored the available options, one of the last questions to be considered is: what happens if it comes wet?

    “Most growers approach the purchase of a new drill from the perspective of wanting to do the job faster and more easily than before. Too often this comes at the cost of flexibility. “Most growers need at least two drills, probably a tine and disc, one of which may be a lightweight combination because it gives you the flexibility to go when conditions are less than ideal. Wet autumns are an increasing phenomenon, so systems need to be flexible otherwise performance suffers. It doesn’t mean you need to own it, but having access to a lightweight, mounted tine drill will often deliver the flexibility most growers require,” says Mr Corbett.

    Profitability

    Changing the system in expectation of financial improvements that aren’t then realised can be highly costly and stressful. To investigate this, Agrii has run long-term trials investigating the impact on performance from a system that seeks to balance cover crops and establishment regime across the rotation. “Few direct drilling advocates talk about yields or gross margin performance. Adopt the wrong approach for the situation or move faster than the transition will allow, and the impact to gross margins can be severe,” Mr Lloyd says. 

    A new seed drill won’t resolve a grassweed situation or increase biomass, so any system needs to first reflect the principles supporting good farming practices. “The condition of the ground, what are the mitigating circumstances, especially grassweed pressures, what crop and variety are you growing? These are the single biggest influence on performance.

    “The Stow Longa rotations trial is in its seventh year; in the 2021 season we recorded a difference in winter wheat gross margin of £1,448/ha. This is partly due to a worsening grassweed problem, namely soft brome on a farm where this was not previously an issue, following five years of direct drilling in a section of the trial. The transition, especially on heavy land, must be managed with an understanding of the trade-offs,” Mr Lloyd says.